Relative efficiency of solvents used in endodontics

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 38-40

  Hansen, Mark G ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b Westcentre ^*

^c Westcentre   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AH 26 FILLING MATERIAL; BISMUTH; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; EPOXY RESIN; GUTTA PERCHA; METHENAMINE; PROCO SOL; PROCO-SOL; RESIN; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SALICYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SEALAPEX; SILVER; SOLVENT; TITANIUM; ZINC OXIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG COMBINATION; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SOLUBILITY; STATISTICS; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISMUTH; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; DRUG COMBINATIONS; EPOXY RESINS; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMANS; METHENAMINE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SALICYLATES; SILVER; SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 0031601278     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80211-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Nguyen NT. Obturation of the root canal system. In: Cohen SC, Burns RC, ed. Pathways of the pulp. 4th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1987:195-8, 216-22, 264-9.
2. Ladley RW, Campbell AD, Hicks ML, Li S-H. Effectiveness of halothane used with ultrasonic or hand instrumentation to remove gutta percha from the root canal. J Endodon 1991;17:221-4.
3. Kaplowitz GJ. Evaluation of gutta percha solvents. J Endodon 1990; 16:539-40.
4. Wilcox LR. Endodontic retreatment: ultrasonics and chloroform as the final step in instrumentation. J Endodon 1989;15:125-8.
5. Wilcox LR, Krell KV, Madison S, Rittman B. Endodontic retreatment: evaluation of gutta percha and sealer removal and canal reinstrumentation. J Endodon 1987;13:453-7.
6. Tamse A, Unger U, Metzger Z, Rosenberg M. Gutta percha solvents - a comparative study. J Endodon 1986;12:337-9.
7. Nina LD, Ether S, Oliverira E, Paulo S. A valiacao das propriedaded de solventes de guta-percha. Quintessencia 1980;7:27-31.
8. United States Food and Drug Administration. Chloroform, use as an ingredient (active or inactive) in drug products. In: Federal Register No. 26845. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974
9. (cited in Kaplowitz GJ. Evaluation of gutta percha solvents. J Endodon 1990;16:539-40).
10. Morse DR, Martell B, Pike CG, Fantasia J, Esposito JV, Furst ML. A comparative tissue toxicity evaluation of gutta percha root canal sealers. Part 1. Six hour findings. J Endodon 1984;10:246-9.
11. Merck Index. An encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs and biologicals. In: Budavari S, ed. Merck Index. 11th ed. Rahway, NJ: Merck and Co., 1989: 1590.
12. Damas J, Remacle-Volon G, Deflandre E. Further studies of the mechanism of counter irritation by turpentine. Arch Pharmacol 1986;332:196-200.
13. Wourms DJ, Campbell AD, Hicks ML, Pelleu GB. Alternative solvents to chloroform for gutta percha removal. J Endodon 1990;16:224-6.
14. Hunter KR, Doblecki W, Pelleu GB. Halothane and eucalyptol as alternatives to chloroform for softening gutta percha. J Endodon 1991;17: 310-12.
15. Koch CRE. History of dental surgery, vol. 1. Ft. Wayne, IN: National Art Publishing Co., 1910:213-4.
16. Morse DR, Wilcko JM. Gutta percha-eucapercha: a new look at an old technique. 1978;26:58-64.
17. Mattison GD, Delivanis PD, Thacker RW, Hassel KJ. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. J Prosth Dent 1984;51:785-9.
18. McDonald MN, Vire DE. Chloroform in the endodontic operatory. J Endodon 1992;18:301-3.
19. Tagger M, Tagger E. Periapical reactions to calcium hydroxide-containing sealers and AH26. Endod Dental Traumatol 1989;5:139-46.
20. Schroeder A. In: Endodontics - science and practice. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., 1981:244-5.