Koilocytotic atypia in Papanicolaou smears: Reproducibility and biopsy correlations

Cancer

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 10-15

  Lee, Kenneth R ^a   Winter, Lori J ^a   Crum, Christopher P ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bethesda system; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cervix; Cytology; Kappa statistics; Koilocytes; Papanicolaou smears; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

BIOPSY; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0031585834     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970225)81:1<10::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-K     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Patten SF. Cytopathologic manifestations of dysplasia in diagnostic cytopathology of the uterine cervix. In: Weid GL, von Haam E, Koss LG, Reagan JW, editors. Monographs in clinical cytology. Volume 3. Basel: S. Karger, 1978:146-70.
2. Kurman RJ, Solomon D. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
3. Herbst AL. The Bethesda system for surgical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: a note of caution. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76:449-50.
4. Bottles K, Reiter RC, Steiner AL, Zaleski S, Bedrossian CWN, Johnson SR. Problems encountered with the Bethesda system: the University of Iowa experience. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:410-4.
5. Syrjanen K, Kataja V, Yliskoski M, Chang F, Syrjanen S, Saarikoski S. The natural history of cervical papillomavirus lesions does not substantiate the biologic relevance of the Bethesda system. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:675-82.
6. Cervical cytology: evaluation and management of abnormalities. ACOG Technical Bulletin. 1993;183:1-8.
7. Richart RM, Wright TC. Controversies in the management of low grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer 1993:71:1413-21.
8. Kurman RJ, Hanson DE, Herbst AL, Nolles KL, Schiffman MH. Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. JAMA 1994;271:1866-9.
9. Kurman RJ, Norris HJ, Wilkerson E. Tumors of the cervix, vagina and vulva. In: Rosai J, Sobin LH, editors. Atlas of tumor pathology. Third Series. Fascicle 4. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1992:44-54.
10. Crum CP. Genital papillomaviruses and related neoplasms. Causation, diagnosis and classification (Bethesda). Mod Pathol 1994;7:138-45.
11. Meisels A, Fortin R, Roy M. Condylomatous lesions of the cervix and vagina. II. Cytologic, colposcopic and histopathologic study. Acta Cytol 1977;21:379-90.
12. Meisels A, Roy M, Fortier M, Morin C, Casas-Cordero M, Shah KV, et al. Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: the atypical condyloma. Acta Cytol 1981;25:7-16.
13. Crum CP, Ikenberg H, Richart RM, Gissman L. Human papillomavirus type 16 and early cervical neoplasia. N Engl J Med 1984;310:880-3.
14. Crum CP. Redefining cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Surg Pathol 1995;1:159-64.
15. Willet GD, Kurman RJ, Reid R. Correlation of the histological appearance of interepithelial neoplasia of the cervix with human papillomavirus types. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1989; 8:18-25.
16. Tabarra S, Saleh ADM, Andersen WA, Barber SR, Taylor PT, Crum CP. The Bethesda classification for squamous intraepithelial lesions: histologic, cytologic, and viral correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:338-46.
17. Jones MH, Jenkins D, Cuzick J, Wolfendale MR, Jones JJ, Balogun-Lynch C, et al. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance. Lancet 1982;339:1140-3.
18. Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67:665-9.
19. Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Erozan YS, Wacholder S, Kurman RJ. The Bethesda system: a proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:1155-8.
20. Schlaen I, Gonzalez-Garcia MR, Weismann EA. Predictive value of phenotypic cytologic characteristics in early dysplastic cervical lesions. Acta Cytol 1988;32:298-302.
21. Lonky NM, Navarre GL, Saunders S, Sadeghi M, Wolde-Tsadik G. Low grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:716-20.
22. Selvaggi SM. Cytologic detection of condylomas and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix with histologic correlation. Cancer 1986;58:2076-81.
23. Hall S, Wu TC, Soudi N, Sherman ME. Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: cytologie predictions of biopsy confirmation. Diagn Cytopathol 1994;10:3-9.
24. Klinkhamer PJJ, Vooijs GP, deHaan AFJ. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities in cervical smears. Acta Cytol 1988;32:794-800.
25. Confortini M, Biggeri A, Carioggi MP, Carozzi FM, Minuti PA, Russo A, et al. Intralaboratory reproducibility in cervical cytology. Results of the application of a 100 slide set. Acta Cytol 1993;37:49-54.
26. Joste NE, Rushing L, Granados R, Zitz J, Genest DR, Crum CP, et al. Bethesda Classification of cervicovaginal smears: reproducibility and viral correlates. Hum Pathol 1996; 27:581-5.
27. Dodd LG, Sneige N, Villarreal Y, Fanning CV, Staerkel GA, Caraway NP, et al. Quality assurance study of simultaneously sampled, noncorrelating cervical cytology and biopsies. Diagn Cytopathol 1991;9:138-44.
28. Massad LS, Halpern CJ, Bitterman P. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision. Gynecol Oncol 1996;60:400-3.