An urban hydrological model with high spatial resolution rainfall from a meteorological model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 200, Issue 1-4, 1997, Pages 58-83

  Thielen, J ^a,b   Creutin, J D ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DE GLACIOLOGIE ET GÉOPHYSIQUE DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Hydrological model; Rainfall simulation; Theoretical description; Urban water cycle

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; RAINFALL SIMULATION; URBAN WATER CYCLE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METEOROLOGY; RAIN; STORM SEWERS; STORMS;

HYDROLOGY;

HYDROLOGY; MODEL; RAINFALL; URBAN AREA; WATER SUPPLY;

HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; METEOROLOGICAL MODEL; RAINFALL; SURFACE WATER; URBAN CATCHMENT; WATER CYCLE;

FRANCE, ILE-DE-FRANCE, PARIS;

EID: 0031574289     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00002-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berry, E.X., Reinhardt, R.L., 1974. An analysis of cloud drop growth by collection: Parts I-IV.J. Atmos. Sci., 31: 1814-1831, 2118-2135.
2. Boyden, C.J. 1963. A simple instability index for use as a synoptic parameter. Meteorol. Mag., 92: 198-210.
3. Braud, I., Dantas-Antonino, A.C., Vauclin, M., Thony, J.L., Ruelle, P., 1995. A simple soil-plant-atmosphere transfer model (SiSPAT): development and field verification. J. Hydrol., 166: 213-250.
4. Bruintjes, R.T., Clark, T.L., Hall, W.D., 1994. Interactions between topographic airflow and cloud/precipitation development during the passage of a winter storm in Arizona. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 (1): 48-67.
5. Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., Mays, L.W., 1988. Applied Hydrology. Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 572.
6. Clark, T.L., 1979. Numerical simulations with a three-dimensional cloud model: lateral boundary condition experiments and multi-cellular severe storm calculations. J. Atmos. Sci., 34: 2191-2215.
7. Clark, T.L., Farley, D., 1984. Severe downslope windstorm calculations in two and three spatial dimensions using anelastic interactive grid nesting: a possible mechanism for gustiness. J. Atmos. Sci., 41: 329-350.
8. Clark, T.L., Gall, R., 1982. Three-dimensional numerical simulations of airflow over mountainous terrain: a comparison with observations. Mon. Weather Rev., 100: 766-791.
9. Clark, T.L., Hall, W., 1991. Multi-domain simulations of the time dependent Navier-Stokes equations: benchmark error analyses of nesting procedures. J. Comp. Phys., 92: 456-481.
10. Creutin, J.D., Obled, C., 1982. Objective analysis and mapping techniques for rainfall fields: an objective comparison. Water Resour. Res., 18: 413-431.
11. Cunge, J.A., Holly, F.M., 1980. Practical Aspects of Computational River Hydraulics. Pitman, London, pp. 420.
12. Einfalt, T., Denoeux, T., Jacquet, G., 1990. A radar rainfall forecasting method designed for hydrological purposes. J. Hydrol., 114: 229-244.
13. Georgakakos, K.P., Kavvas, M.L., 1987. Precipitation analyses, modelling and prediction in hydrology. Rev. Geophys., 25 (2): 163-178.
14. Hall, M.J., 1984. Urban Hydrology. Elsevier Applied Science, Barking, UK, pp. 249.
15. Huff, F.A., 1986. Urban hydrometeorology review. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 67 (6): 703-711.
16. Jacquet, G., Andrieu, H., Denoeux, T., 1987. About radar rainfall measurement. In: B.C. Yen (Editor), VIth Int. Conf. on Urban Storm Drainage, Lausanne, IAHR, Little Town, Colorado Vol. 1, pp. 25-30.
17. Kessler, E., 1969. On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations. Meteorol. Monogr., 10 (32), pp. 84.
18. Koenig, L.R., Murray, F.W., 1976. Ice-bearing cumulus cloud evolution. Numerical simulation and general comparison against observation. J. Appl. Meteorol., 15: 747-762.
19. Lipps, F.G., Hemler, R.S., 1982. A scale analysis of deep moist convection and some related numerical calculations. J. Atmos. Sci., 39: 2192-2210.
20. Ludlam, F.H., 1980. Clouds and Storms, the Behaviour and Effect of Water in the Atmosphere. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
21. Maidment, D.R., 1992. Handbook of Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
22. Marshall, J.S., Palmer, W.M., 1948. The distribution of raindrop with size. J. Meteorol., 5: 165-166.
23. Mazaudou, B., Nègre, J.L., 1982. Un modèle mathématique de simulation adapté à la conception et à la gestion des réseaux d'assainissement: le programme CAREDAS. Societé Hydrotechnique de France, Paris, XVIIième Journèes de l'Hydraulique, Nantes, 14-16 September 1982, Rep. 11, pp. 11.1-11.6.
24. Mazaudou, B., Nègre, J.L., 1987. Real time simulator; an indispensable aid to the real time management of a sewage network Societé Hydrotechnique de France, Paris. In: 4th Int. Conf. on Urban Storm Drainage, Lausanne.
25. Niemczynowicz, J., 1988. The rainfall movement - a valuable complement to short-term rainfall data. J. Hydrol., 104: 311-326.
26. Noilhan, J., Planton, S., 1989. A simple parameterisation of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon. Weather Rev., 117: 536-549.
27. Rackliff, P.G., 1962. Application of an instability index to regional forecasting. Meteorol. Mag., 91: 113-120.
28. Thielen, J., 1994. The influence of the Pennines on severe convective storms; a study by radar observations and modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Lancaster University, UK, pp. 300.