Non-local two-photon correlations using interferometers physically separated by 35 meters

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 595-600

  Tittel, W ^a   Brendel, J ^a   Herzog, T ^a   Zbinden, H ^a   Gisin, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031573758     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i1997-00509-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BELL J. S., Physics, 1 (1964) 195.
2. BOHM D., Phys. Rev., 85 (1952) 166; 180.
3. FREEDMAN J. and CLAUSER J. F., Phys. Rev. Lett., 28 (1972) 938.
4. ASPECT A., GRANGIER P. and ROGER G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 47 (1981) 460.
5. ASPECT A., GRANGIER P. and ROGER G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 49 (1982) 91.
6. ASPECT A., DALIBARD J. and ROGER G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 49 (1982) 1804.
7. OU Z. Y. and MANDEL L., Phys. Rev. Lett., 61 (1988) 50.
8. KWIAT P. G., MATTLE K., WEINFURTER H., ZEILINGER A., SERGIENKO A. V. and SHIH Y. H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (1995) 4337.
9. RARITY J. G. and TAPSTER P. R., Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990) 2495.
10. BRENDEL J., MOHLER E. and MARTIENSSEN W., Europhys. Lett., 20 (1992) 575.
11. STREKALOV D. V., PITTMAN T. B., SERGIENKO A. V., SHIH Y. H. and KWIAT P. G., Phys. Rev. A, 54 (1996) R1.
12. TAPSTER P. R., RARITY J. G. and OWENS P. C. M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 73 (1994) 1923; FRANSON J. D., Phys. Rev. A, 44 (1991) 4552.
13. TAPSTER P. R., RARITY J. G. and OWENS P. C. M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 73 (1994) 1923; FRANSON J. D., Phys. Rev. A, 44 (1991) 4552.
14. EKERT A. K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 67 (1991) 661.
15. BENNETT C. H., BRASSARD G., CRÉPEAU C., JOZSA R., PERES A. and WOOTTERS W. K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 70 (1993) 1895.
16. SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66 (1991) 1388; SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. A, 46 (1992) 3646; SANTOS E., Phys. Lett. A, 200 (1995) 1; DE CARO L. and GARUCCIO A., Phys. Rev. A, 50 (1994) 2803.
17. SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66 (1991) 1388; SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. A, 46 (1992) 3646; SANTOS E., Phys. Lett. A, 200 (1995) 1; DE CARO L. and GARUCCIO A., Phys. Rev. A, 50 (1994) 2803.
18. SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66 (1991) 1388; SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. A, 46 (1992) 3646; SANTOS E., Phys. Lett. A, 200 (1995) 1; DE CARO L. and GARUCCIO A., Phys. Rev. A, 50 (1994) 2803.
19. SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66 (1991) 1388; SANTOS E., Phys. Rev. A, 46 (1992) 3646; SANTOS E., Phys. Lett. A, 200 (1995) 1; DE CARO L. and GARUCCIO A., Phys. Rev. A, 50 (1994) 2803.
20. FRY E. S., WALTHER T. and LI S., Phys. Rev. A, 52 (1995) 4381.
21. FRANSON J. D., Phys. Rev. Lett., 62 (1989) 2205.
22. CLAUSER J. F., HORNE M. A., SHIMONY A. and HOLT R. A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 23 (1969) 880.
23. BRENDEL J., MOHLER E. and MARTIENSSEN W., Phys. Rev. Lett., 66 (1991) 1142.
24. 32 = -18.3 pm/V is about nine times the highest coefficient in BBO.
25. MULLER A., HERZOG T., HUTTNER B., TITTEL W., ZBINDEN H. and GISIN N., Appl. Phys. Lett., 70 (1997) 793.
26. 2 value smaller than a certain limit. This threshold, depending on the number of measured data and the desired confidence level (as common in statistics, we choose 0.95) can be found in tables. Thus, the probability that our data are corresponding to a sinusoidal function with a visibility of 81.6 ± 1.1% is 0.95.