Defining a package of healthcare services the NHS is responsible for. The case for

British Medical Journal

Volumn 314, Issue 7079, 1997, Pages 503-505

  New, Bill ^a  

^a KING S FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DENTISTRY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESPONSIBILITY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE; UNITED KINGDOM;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 0031568587     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Klein R, Day P, Redmayne S. Managing scarcity: priority setting and rationing in the NHS. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996.
2. Redmayne S, Klein R. Rationing in practice: the case of in vitro fertilisation. BMJ 1993;306:1521-4.
3. New B, Le Grand J. Rationing in the NHS: principles and pragmatism. London: King's Fund, 1996.
4. Redmayne S. Small steps, big goals: purchasing policies in the NHS. Birmingham: NAHAT, 1996.
5. Veatch RM. The Oregon experiment: needless and real worries. In: Strosberg MA, Wiener JM, Baker R, Fein IA, eds. Rationing America's medical care: The Oregon plan and beyond. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1992.
6. Day P, Klein R, Tipping G. Inspecting for quality: services for the elderly. Bath: Centre for the Study of Social Policy, 1988.
7. Department of Health and Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Departmental Report. London: HMSO, 1992 (Cm 1913).