Is the debate over?

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 156, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 207-209

  Boyd, Norman F ^a  

^a PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BREAST TUMOR; CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NOTE; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANADA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; META-ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0031567949     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Fish EB, Hirald GY, Lickley HLA, Maurer VE. A prospective evaluation of physical examination of the breast. Am J Sarg 1981;142(3):331-4.
2. Boyd NF, Wolfson C, Moskowitz M, Carlile T, Petitclerc M, Fern HA, et al. Observer variation in the interpretation of xeromammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982;68(3):357-63.
3. Boyd NF, Wolfson C, Moskowitz M, Carlile T, Petitclerc C, Fern H, et al. Observer variation in the classification of mammographie parenchyma! pattern. J Chronic Dis 1986;39(6):465-72.
4. Boyd NF, Jensen H, Cooke G, Lee Han HW. The relationship of mammographie and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:1170-9.
5. Lee Han H, Jensen H, Cooke G, Boyd NF. A comparison of the epidemiology of atypical hyperplasia of the breast epithelium and mammographie parenchyma! densities. Ear J Cancer Prcv 1993;2(suppl 3):33-40.
6. Boyd NF, ByngJ, Yaffe M, Jong R, Fishell E, Little L, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographie densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer last 1995; 87:670-5.
7. Boyd NF, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler D, Lockwood G, Zylak CJ. A critical appraisal of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Radiology 1993; 189:661-3.
8. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. Can MedAssocJ 1992;147:1459-76.
9. Tarone RE. The excess of patients with advanced breast cancer in young women screened with mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer 1994;75(4):997-1003.
10. Cohen MM, Kaufen PA, MacWilliam L, Tate RB. Using an alternative data source to examine randomization in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. JClin EpMemiol 1996;49(9): 103 9-44.
11. Baines CJ. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a perspective on criticisms. Ann Intern Med 1994;120(4):326-34.
12. Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH III, Smith RA. Benefit of mammography screening in women age 40-49: current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer 1995;75:1619-26.