Target search in tactical displays with standard, single cue, and redundant coding

Displays

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-10

  Weidenbacher, Hollis J ^a   Barnes, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b Army Research Laboratory   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Military symbology; Redundant coding; Tactical displays; Visual search

Indexed keywords

MILITARY APPLICATIONS; MILITARY DATA PROCESSING; SIGNAL ENCODING;

MILITARY SIMBOLOGY; REDUNDANT CODING; TACTICAL DISPLAYS; VISUAL SEARCH;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 0031560575     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-9382(96)01027-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. W.P. Colquhoun and A.D. Baddeley, Influence of signal probability during pretraining on vigilance decrement, J. Exp. Psychol., 73 (1967) 153-155.
2. W. Garner and G. Felfoldy, Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing, Cognitive Psychol., 1 (1970) 225-241.
3. C.D. Wickens, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 2nd ed., Harper Collins, New York, 1992.
4. B. Knapp, F. Moses and L. Gellman, Information highlighting on complex displays, in: Badre and Schneiderman, eds., Directions in Human-Computer Interaction, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 1982, pp. 195-215.
5. Erikson and Spencer, The rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations, J. Exp. Psychol. Monograph, 79(2) (1969) 2.
6. I. Biederman and S. Chekosky, Processing redundant information, J. Exp. Psychol., 83 (1970) 486-490.
7. A. van der Heijden, R. Schreuder, L. Maris and M. Neerincx, Some evidence for correlated separate activation in a simple letter detection task, Perception and Psychophysics, 36 (1984) 577-585.
8. W. Garner, The Processing of Information and Structure, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Potomac, MD, 1974.
9. J. Pomerantz, L. Sager and R. Stoevet, Perceptual wholes and their component pans: Some configural superiority effects, J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance, 3 (1977) 422-435.
10. A. Treisman and G. Gelade, A feature integration theory of attention, Cognitive Psychol., 12 (1980) 97-136.
11. A. Treisman and R. Paterson, Emergent features, attention, and object perception, J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 12-31.
12. J. Enns, Three dimensional features that pop out during visual search, in D. Brogan, ed., Visual Search, Taylor and Francis, London, 1990, pp. 37-45.
13. D. Regan, K. Beverly and M. Cynader, Stereoscopic systems for motion in depth, in Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B., 204 (1979) 485-501.
14. V.S. Ramachandran, Perception of shape from shading, Nature, 331 (1988) 163-166.
15. H. Nothdurft, Discrimination of higher-order textures, Perception, 14 (1985) 551-560.
16. M. Bravo and R. Blake, Preattentive vision and perceptual groups, Perception, 19 (1990) 515-522.
17. A. Treisman and S. Sato, Conjunction search revisited, J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance, 16 (1990) 459-478.
18. A. Treisman, Perceptual grouping and attention for features and objects, J. Exp. Psycho.: Human Perception and Performance, 8 (1982) 194-214.
19. C.D. Wickens and C.M. Carswell, The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological relevance to display design, Human Factors, 37 (1995) 473-494.