Dynamics of unbinding of polymers in a random medium

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 107, Issue 18, 1997, Pages 7571-7576

  Bhattacharjee, Somendra M ^a   Baumgartner A ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (India)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; ORDER DISORDER TRANSITIONS;

AGING EFFECT; LATTICE MODEL;

POLYMERS;

EID: 0031560155     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.474995     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. R. M. Wartell and A. S. Benight, Phys. Rep. 126, 67 (1985).
2. Protein Folding, edited by T. E. Creighton (Freeman, New York, 1992).
3. See, e.g., T. Halpin-Healy and Y. C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995), and references therein.
4. A. Baumgärtner and M. Muthukumar, Adv. Chem. Phys. edited by I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (Wiley, New York, 1996), Vol. XCIV.
5. K. Fischer and J. Hertz, Spin Glasses (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).
6. M. Peyard and A. R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2755 (1989).
7. L. C. E. Struik, Physical Aging in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials (Elsevier, Houston, 1978).
8. L. Lundgren, P. Svedlindh, P. Nordblad. and O. Beckman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 911 (1983).
9. C. A. Angell, Science 267, 1924 (1995).
10. A more realistic situation would demand a random distribution of the contact energy. See, e.g., S. M. Bhattacharjee and S. Mukherji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 49 (1993).
11. E. Vincent. J. Hammann, M. Ocio, J. P. Bouchaud, and L. F. Cugliandolo, cond-mat/9607224, and references therein.
12. S. Mukherji, Phys. Rev. E 50, R2407 (1994).
13. M. Kardar, Nucl. Phys. B 290, 582 (1988).
14. M. Mezard, J. Phys. (France) 51, 1831 (1990).
15. S. Mukherji and S. M. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Rev. E 53, R6002 (1996).
16. H. Kinzelbach and M. Lassig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2208 (1995).
17. D. S. Fisher, M. P. A. Fisher, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 43, 130 (1991).
18. A. Barrat, cond-mat/9701021.
19. H. Yoshino, J. Phys. A 29, 1421 (1996).
20. See, e.g., A. Baumgärtner in Applications of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
21. The case of both ends free would correspond to annealed disorder because the chains then explore the whole space to choose the optimum position.
22. H. Rieger, Physica A 224, 267 (1996); J. Kisker, L. Santen, M. Schreckenberg, and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev B 53, 6418 (1996).
23. H. Rieger, Physica A 224, 267 (1996); J. Kisker, L. Santen, M. Schreckenberg, and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev B 53, 6418 (1996).
24. L. V. Mikheev, B. Drossel, and M. Kardar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1170 (1995).
25. K. P. N. Murthy and S. R. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. A 36, 5087 (1987).
26. M. E. Fisher, J. Stat, Phys. 34, 667 (1984).
27. S. Mukherji and S. M. Bhattacharjee, J. Phys. 26, L1139 (1993); 28, 4668 (E) (1995).
28. S. Mukherji and S. M. Bhattacharjee, J. Phys. 26, L1139 (1993); 28, 4668 (E) (1995).