Are anterior occlusal radiographs still indicated for orthodontic assessment?

British Dental Journal

Volumn 183, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 325-328

  Giles, S A ^a   Taylor, N G ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL OCCLUSION; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0031560102     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809487     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Taylor N G, Jones A G. Are anterior occlusal radiographs indicated to supplement panoramic radiographs during orthodontic assessment? Br Dent J 179: 377-381.
2. Brown C E, Christen A C, Jerman A C. Dimensions of the focal trough in panoramic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1972; 84: 843-847.
3. Lund T M, Manson-Hing L R. Relations between tooth positions and focal troughs of panoramic machines. Oral Surg 1975; 40: 285-293.
4. Edge M M B, Champion C. Interpretation of the orthopantomogram. Br Dent J 1972; 133: 289-296.
5. Isaacson K G, Jones M L (eds). Orthodontic radiography: guidelines. London: British Orthodontic Society, 1995.
6. Douglass C W. Evaluating diagnostic tests. Adv Dent Res 1993; 7: 66-69.
7. Neal J J D, Bowden D E J. The diagnostic value of panoramic radiographs in children aged nine to ten years. Br J Orthod 1988; 15: 193-197.