Dynamic heterogeneities and cooperativity in a lattice model glass

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 107, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 3813-3820

  Heuer, Andreas ^a   Tracht, Ursula ^a   Spiess, Hans W ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR POLYMER RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; GLASS TRANSITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; REACTION KINETICS; RELAXATION PROCESSES; TEMPERATURE;

DEGREE OF COOPERATIVITY; DYNAMIC HETEROGENEITY; ISING MODEL; LATTICE MODEL;

GLASS;

EID: 0031559741     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.474740     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. J. Jäckle, Rep. Prog. Phys. 49, 171 (1986).
2. W. Götze and L. Sjögren, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 241 (1992).
3. Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
4. G. H. Fredrickson and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1244 (1984).
5. G. H. Fredrickson and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5822 (1985).
6. G. H. Fredrickson and S. A. Brawer, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3351 (1986).
7. G. H. Fredrickson, in Dynamic Aspects of Structural Changes in Liquids and Gases, edited by C. A. Angell and M. Goldstein (Academic, New York, 1986), Vol. 484, pp. 185-205.
8. G. H. Fredrickson, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39, 149 (1988).
9. M. Schulz, P. R. S. Sharma, and H. L. Frisch, Phys. Rev. B 52, 7195 (1995).
10. J. Jäckle, in Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994), pp. 233-249.
11. C. Donati and J. Jäckle, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8, 2733 (1996).
12. J. Reiter, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 544 (1991).
13. S. Butler and P. Harrowell, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4454 (1991).
14. S. Butler and P. Harrowell. J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4466 (1991).
15. M. Foley and P Harrowell, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5069 (1993).
16. K. Schmidt-Rohr and H. W. Spiess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3020 (1991).
17. K. Schmidt-Rohr and H. W. Spiess, Multidimensional Solid-State NMR and Polymers (Academic, London, 1994).
18. A. Heuer, M. Wilhelm, H. Zimmermann, and H. W. Spiess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2851 (1995).
19. R. Boehmer, G. Hinze, G. Diezemann, B. Geil, and H. Sillescu, Europhys. Lett. 36, 55 (1996).
20. S. C. Kuebler, A. Heuer, and H. W. Spiess, Phys. Rev. E 56, 741 (1997).
21. A. Heuer, S. C. Kuebler, U. Tracht, and H. W. Spiess, Appl. Magn. Reson. (to be published).
22. M. T. Cicerone and M. D. Ediger, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 5684 (1995).
23. B. Schiener, A. Loidl, R. Böhmer, and R. V. Chamberlin, Science 274, 752 (1996).
24. R. Richert, J. Phys. Chem. (submitted).
25. A. Heuer, Phys. Rev. E 56, 730 (1997).
26. As outlined in Ref. 25, from a purely mathematical perspective it is possible to have Q< 1. However, this case involves some kind of unphysical anticorrelations.
27. A. Heuer and K. Okun, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 6176 (1997).
28. Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, edited by K. Binder (Springer, Berlin, 1979).
29. A. Heuer and R. J. Silbey, Phys. Rev. B 53, 609 (1996).
30. H. Sillescu, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 4877 (1996).
31. U. Tracht, A. Heuer, and H. W. Spiess (in preparation).