Genetic dysphasia and linguistic theory

Journal of Neurolinguistics

Volumn 10, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 47-73

  Newmeyer, Frederick J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031557531     PISSN: 09116044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0911-6044(97)00002-X     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. 1. Saussure, F. de, Course in General Linguistics. McGraw-Hill. [Translation of Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot, 1916, New York, 1966.
2. 2. Chomsky, N., Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague, 1957.
3. 3. Schuchardt, H., On sound laws: against the Neogrammarians. In Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change, eds T. Vennemann and T. Wilbur, pp. 39-72. Athenäum, Frankfurt, 1972 (1885).
4. 4. Schuchardt, H., Review of F. Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale. Literaturblatt für germanische und romanische Philologie 23, 204-208, 1917.
5. 5. Percival, W. K., The Saussurean paradigm: fact or fantasy? Semiotica 36, 33-49, 1981.
6. 6. Givón, T., On Understanding Grammar. Academic Press, New York, 1979.
7. 7. Chomsky, N., Conditions on transformations. In A festschrift for Morris Halle, eds S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, pp. 232-286. Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1973.
8. 8. Givón, T. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Volume 2. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1990.
9. 9. Haiman, J., Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
10. 10. Prince, E. F., A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54, 883-906.
11. 11. Akmajian, A. and Heny, F., An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1975.
12. 12. Chomsky, N., Lectures on Government and Binding. Studies in Generative Grammar. Volume 9. Foris, Dordrecht, 1981.
13. 13. Riemsdijk, H. van and Williams, E., NP-structure. Linguistic Review 1, 171-218, 1981.
14. 14. Pullum, G. K., Rule Interaction and the Organization of a Grammar. Garland, New York, 1979.
15. 15. Hoekstra, T. and Kooij, J. G., The innateness hypothesis. In Explaining Language Universals, ed. J. A. Hawkins, pp. 31-55. Blackwell, Oxford, 1988.
16. 16. Deane, P., Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Mouton, The Hague, 1992.
17. 17. Lakoff, G., Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.
18. 18. Langacker, R., Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume 1; Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1987.
19. 19. Chomsky, N., Rules and Representations. Columbia University Press, New York, 1980.
20. 20. Schütze, C., The Empirical Basis of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1966.
21. 21. Cowart, W., Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1997.
22. 22. Hawkins, J. A., Explaining language universals. In Explaining Language Universals, ed. J. A. Hawkins, pp. 3-28. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1988.
23. 23. Hawkins, J. A., A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Volume 73. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
24. 24. Pullum, G. K., Learnability, hyperlearning, and the poverty of the simulus. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1996.
25. 25. Curtiss, S., Developmental dissociations between language and cognition. In Exceptional Language and Linguistics, eds L. K. Obler and L. Menn, pp. 285-312. Academic Press, New York, 1982.
26. 26. Fromkin, V., The state of brain/language research. In Language, Communication and the Brain, ed. F. Plum, Raven, New York, 1988.
27. 27. Yamada, J., Laura: A Case for the Modularity of Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
28. 28. Smith, N. and Tsimpli, I.-M., The Mind of a Savant: Language Learning and Modularity. Blackwell, Oxford, 1995.
29. 29. Cromer, R. F., Hierarchical planning disability in the drawings and constructions of a special group of severely aphasic children. Brain and Cognition 2, 144-164, 1983.
30. 30. Grossman, M. A., Central processor for hierarchically structured material. Evidence from Broaca's aphasia. Neuropsychologia 18, 299-308, 1980.
31. 31. Zurif, E., Neurolinguistics. In Handbook of cognitive neuroscience, ed. M. Gassaniga, Plenum, 1984.
32. 32. Blumstein, S. E., Linguistic deficits in aphasia. In Language, communication and the brain, ed. F. Plum, Raven, New York, 1988.
33. 33. Linebarger, M., Neuropsychology of sentence parsing. In Cognitive neuropsychology and neurolinguistics, ed. A. Caramazza, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990.
34. 34. Caplan, D. and Hildebrandt, N., Disorders of syntactic comprehension. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
35. 35. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Coltheart, M. and Funnel, E., Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence reexamined. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5, 105-132, 1988.
36. 36. Kaplan, J. A., Brownell, H., Jacobs, J. R. and Gardner, H., The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language 38, 315-333, 1990.
37. 37. Breedin, S. D. and Saffran E. M., Sentence processing in the face of semantic loss: a case study. Temple University, 1996.
38. 38. Poizner, H., Klima, E. S. and Bellugi, U., What the Hands Reveal About the Brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
39. 39. Kempler, D., Curtiss, S. and Jackson, C., Syntactic preservation in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 30, 343-350, 1987.
40. 40. Burd, L. and Kerbeshian, J., Hyperlexia in Prader-Willi syndrome. Lancet 1989, 983-984, 1989.
41. 41. Gardner, R., Are there language-regulating genes on chromosome 15? In Studies in Language Origins, ed. E. Callary, in press.
42. 42. Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S. A., Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition 11, 539-550, 1983.
43. 43. Neville, H. J., Mills, D. L. and Lawson, D. S., Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex 2, 244-258, 1992.
44. 44. Osterhout, L. and Holcomb, P. J., Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 785-806, 1992.
45. 45. Lieberman, P., Uniquely Human: The Evolution of Speech, Thought, and Selfless Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
46. 46. Müller, R.-A., Innateness, autonomy, universality? Neurobiological approaches to language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 611-675, 1996.
47. 47. Chomsky, N., Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger, New York, 1986.
48. 48. Pinker, S., The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. Morrow, New York, 1994.
49. 49. Grodzinsky, Y., Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language 27, 135-159, 1986.
50. 50. Grodzinsky, Y., Theoretical Perspectives on Language Deficits. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
51. 51. Grodzinsky, Y., Pierce, A. and Marakovitz, S., Neuropsychological reasons for a transformational analysis of verbal passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 431-453, 1991.
52. 52. Bickerton, D., Language and Human Behavior. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1995.
53. 53. Cromer, R. F., The basis of childhood dysphasia: a linguistic approach. In Developmental Dysphasia, ed. M. Wyke, pp. 85-134. Academic Press, London, 1978.
54. 54. Fletcher, P. and Ingham, R., Grammatical impairment. In The Handbook of Child Language, eds P. Fletcher and B. MacWhinney, pp. 603-622. Blackwell, Oxford, 1995.
55. 55. Gopnik, M., Dysphasia in an extended family. Nature 344, 715, 1990.
56. 56. Gopnik, M., The family. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 1-4, 1994.
57. 57. Gopnik, M., Impairments of tense in a familial language disorder. Journal of Neurolinguistics 8, 109-133, 1994.
58. 58. Gopnik, M. and Crago, M., Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition 39, 1-50, 1991.
59. 59. Gopnik, M., Theoretical implications of inherited dysphasia. In Other Children, Other Languages, ed. Y. Levy, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992.
60. 60. Vargha-Khadem, F., Watkins, K., Alcock, K., Fletcher, P. and Passingham, R., Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically transmitted speech and language disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92, 930-933, 1995.
61. 61. Goad, H. and Gopnik, M., Three models for the description of SLI. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 109-137.
62. 62. Leonard, L. B., Language learnability and specific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics 10, 179-202, 1989.
63. 63. Leonard, L. B., Specific language impairment in three languages: some cross-linguistic evidence. In Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children: Correlates, Characteristics, and Outcomes, eds P. Fletcher and D. Hall, pp. 118-126. Singular Publishing, San Diego, 1992.
64. 64. Leonard, L. B., Some problems facing accounts of morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment. In Specific Language Impairments in Children, eds R. V. Watkins and M. L. Rice, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, 1994.
65. 65. Leonard, L. B., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M., McGregor, K. and Sabbadini, L., Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: the status of features in the underlying grammar. Language Acquisition 2, 151-179, 1992.
66. 66. Goad, H. and Gopnik, M., Phoneme discrimination in familial language impairment. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 10-15, 1994.
67. 67. Gopnik, M., The perceptual processing hypothesis revisited. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 135-141, 1994.
68. 68. Fletcher, P., Untitled scientific correspondence. Nature 346, 1990.
69. 69. Fletcher, P., Language impairment in a British family: characteristics and interpretation. Evolution of Human Language Conference, Edinburgh, 1996.
70. 70. Gopnik, M., The articulatory hypothesis: production of final alveolars in monomorphemic words. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 129-134, 1994.
71. 71. Bishop, D. V. M., Language development in children with abnormal structure or function of the speech apparatus. In Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances, eds D. V. M. Bishop and K. Mogford. Churchill Livingstone, London, 1988.
72. 72. Piggott, G. L. and Kessler Robb, M., Prosodic organization in familial language impairment: evidence from stress. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 16-23, 1994.
73. 73. Bishop, D. V. M., The causes of specific development language disorder ('developmental dysphasia'). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 28, 1-8, 1987.
74. 74. Tallal, P., Ross, R. and Curtiss, S., Familial aggregation in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54, 167-173, 1989.
75. 75. Fukuda, S. E. and Fukuda, S., Development language impairment in Japanese: a linguistic investigation. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 150-177, 1994.
76. 76. Crago, M. and Allen, S., Morphemes gone askew: linguistic impairment in Inuktitut. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 206-215, 1994.
77. 77. Dalalakis, J., Familial language impairment in Greek. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 216-228, 1994.
78. 78. Gopnik, M., Dalalakis, J., Fukuda, S., Fukuda, S. and Kehayia, E., Genetic language impairment: unruly grammars. Proceedings of the British Academy 88, 223-249, 1996.
79. 79. Tomblin, J. B. and Buckwalter, P. R. Studies of genetics of specific language impairment. In Specific Language Impairments in Children, eds R. V. Watkins and M. L. Rice, pp. 17-34. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, 1994.
80. 80. Lewis, B. A. and Thompson L. A., A study of developmental speech and language disorders in twins. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35, 1086-1094, 1992.
81. 81. Bishop, D. V. M., North, T. and Donlan, C., Genetic basis of specific language impairment: evídence from a twin study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 37, 56-71, 1995.
82. 82. Pembrey, M., Genetics and language disorders. In Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children: Correlates, Characteristics, and Outcomes. eds P. Fletcher and D. Hall, pp. 51-62. Singular Publishing, San Diego, 1992.
83. 83. Paradis, M. and Gopnik, M., Compensatory strategies in familial language impairment. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 142-149, 1994.
84. 84. Ross, J. R., Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, MIT, 1967.
85. 85. Chomsky, N., The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
86. 86. Newmeyer, F. J. and Weinberger, S. H., The ontogenesis of the field of second language learning research. In Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition, eds S. Flynn and W. O'Neil, pp. 34-54. Kluwer, Reidel, 1988.
87. 87. Plante, E., Swisher, L., Vance, R. and Rapcsak, S., MRI findings in boys with specific language impairment. Brain and Language 41, 52-66, 1991.
88. 88. Ullman, M. and Gopnik, M., The production of inflectional morphology in hereditary specific language impairment. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 81-118, 1994.
89. 89. Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J., On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds K. Hale and S. J. Keyser, pp. 53-110. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
90. 90. Pesetsky, D., Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
91. 91. Dalalakis, J., English adjectival comparatives and familial language impairment. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 50-66, 1994.
92. 92. Loeb, D. F. and Leonard, L. B. Specific language impairment and parameter theory. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2, 317-327, 1988.
93. 93. Gopnik, M., Feature-blind grammar and dysphasia. Nature 344, 715, 1990.
94. 94. Rice, M. L. and Wexler, K., Types of agreement in SLI children. Sixth International Conference for the Study of Child Language, Trieste, Italy, 1993.
95. 95. Rice, M. L., Grammatical categories of specifically language-impaired children. In Specific Language Impairments in Children, eds R. V. Watkins and M. L. Rice. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, 1994.
96. 96. Grimm, H. and Weinert, S., Is the syntax development of dysphasic children deviant and why? New findings to an old question. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 220-228, 1990.
97. 97. Clahsen, H., Child Language and Developmental Dysphasia: Linguistic Studies of the Acquisition of German. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1991.
98. 98. Clahsen, H. and Hansen, D., The grammatical agreement deficit in specific language impairment: evidence from therapy experiments. In The Biological Basis of Language, ed M. Gopnik, pp. 148-168. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.
99. 99. Van der Lely, H. and Harris, M., Comprehension of reversible sentences in specifically language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 55, 101-117, 1990.
100. 100. Leonard, L. B., Sabbadini, L., Leonard, J. and Volterra, V., Specific language impairment in children: a cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language 32, 233-252, 1987.
101. 101. Clahsen, H., The grammatical characterization of developmental dysphasia. Linguistics 27, 897-920, 1989.
102. 102. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. and Sag, I., Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
103. 103. Rice, M. L., Grammatical categories of specifically language-impaired children. In Bruton Conference on Language Impairments in Children: Current Directions in Research and Intervention, 1992.
104. 104. Kiparsky, P., From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In The Structure of Phonological Representations, eds H. V. D. Hulst and N. Smith, pp. 131-175. Foris, Dordrecht, 1982.
105. 105. Halle, M. and Mohanan, K. P., Segmentai phonology of English. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 57-116, 1985.
106. 106. Leben, W. and Robinson, O. W., Upside-down phonology. Language 53, 1-20, 1977.
107. 107. Pinker, S. and Prince, A., On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. In Connections and Symbols, eds S. Pinker and J. Mehler, pp. 73-194. Bradford, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
108. 108. Pinker, S., Rules of language. Science 253, 530-535, 1991.
109. 109. Pinker, S. and Prince, A., Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17, 231-251, 1991
110. 110. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L., On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, eds J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
111. 111. Bybee, J. L., Morphology as lexical organization. In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, eds M. Hammond and M. Noonan, pp. 119-142. Academic Press, New York, 1988.
112. 112. Goad, H. and Rebellati, C., Pluralization in specific language impairment: affixation or compounding? McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 24-40, 1994.
113. 113. Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. and Xu, F., Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Volume 57, 4, Serial No. 28, 1992.
114. 114. Marin, O. S. M., Saffran, E. M. and Schwartz, M. F., Dissociations of language in aphasias: implications for normal function. In Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech, eds S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis and J. Lancaster, pp. 868-884. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1976.
115. 115. Ullman, M., The computation of inflectional morphology. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, MIT, 1993.
116. 116. Chomsky, N., Reflections on Language. Pantheon, New York, 1975.
117. 117. Chomsky, N., Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
118. 118. Chomsky, N., Linguistics and cognitive science: problems and mysteries. In The Chomskyan Turn: Generative Linguistics, Philosophy, Mathematics, and Psychology, ed. A. Kasher, pp. 26-55. Blackwell, Oxford, 1991.
119. 119. Lightfoot, D. W., Subjacency and sex. Language and Communication 11, 67-69, 1991.
120. 120. Thompson, D. A. W., On Growth and Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1961.
121. 121. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Evolution, selection and cognition: from "learning" to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition 31, 1-44, 1989.
122. 122. Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C., The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm. In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, ed. E. Sober. Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA, 1984.
123. 123. Flynn, S., A Parameter-setting Model of L2 Acquisition. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.
124. 124. White, L., Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. John Benjamins, Amersterdam, 1990.
125. 125. Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G., Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Science, 19, 677-714, 1996.
126. 126. Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M., Verb-raising in second language acquisition: the early stages. In Theorie des Lexicons. The LEXLERN Project, Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, 1991.
127. 127. Schachter, J., Testing a proposed universal. In Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, eds S. M. Gass and J. Schachter, pp. 73-88. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
128. 128. Strozer, J. R., Language Acquisition after Puberty. Georgetown University Press, Washington, 1994.
129. 129. Bley-Vroman, R. D., What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, eds S. M. Gass and J. Schachter, pp. 41-68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
130. 130. Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P., The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners. Second Language Research 2, 93-119, 1986.
131. 131. Clahsen, H., Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition, In Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition, eds S. Flynn and W. O'Neil, pp. 47-75. Kluwer, Reidel, 1988.
132. 132. Finer, D. L. and Broselow, E. I., Second language acquisition of reflexive binding. North Eastern Linguistic Society 16, 154-168, 1986.
133. 133. Johnson, J. S. and Newport, E. L., Critical period effects on universal properties of language. Cognition 39, 215-258, 1991.
134. 134. Gillon, B. S. and Gopnik, M., Grammatical number in subjects with specific language impairment. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 41-49, 1994.