h-Adaptive finite element computation of time-harmonic exterior acoustics problems in two dimensions

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 146, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 65-89

  Stewart, James R ^a,b   Hughes, Thomas J R ^b  

^a Object Reservoir Inc   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING; ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PROBLEM SOLVING;

GALERKIN LEAST SQUARES METHOD; GALERKIN METHOD; HELMHOLTZ EQUATION;

ACOUSTICS;

EID: 0031554592     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01225-X     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. D. Givoli and J.B. Keller, A finite element method for large domains. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 76 (1989) 41-66.
2. I. Harari and T.J.R. Hughes, Studies of domain-based formulations for computing exterior problems of acoustics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 37 (1994) 2935-2950.
3. A.J. Burton and G.F. Miller, The application of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 323 (1971) 201-210.
4. P.M. van den Berg, A.P.M. Zwamborn, G.C. Hsiao and R.E. Kleinman, Iterative solutions of first kind integral equations, in: R.E. Kleinman, R. Kress and E. Martensen, eds., Direct and Inverse Boundary Value Problems (Peter Lang, 1991) 213-232.
5. R.E. Kleinman and G.F. Roach, Boundary integral equations for the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation, SIAM Rev. 16(2) (1974) 214-236.
6. A.F. Seybert and T.K. Rengarajan, The use of CHIEF to obtain unique solutions for acoustic radiation using boundary integral equations, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81 (1987) 1299-1306.
7. K.A. Cunefare, G. Koopman and K. Brod, A boundary element method for acoustic radiation valid for all wavenumbers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85(1) (1989) 39-48.
8. S.M. Kirkup, Solution of exterior acoustic problems by the boundary element method, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Brighton Polytechnic, Brighton, UK, 1989.
9. L. Demkowicz, J.T. Oden, M. Ainsworth and P. Geng, Solution of elastic scattering problems in linear acoustics using h-p boundary element methods, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 36 (1991) 29-63.
10. L. Demkowicz and J.T. Oden, Recent progress on application of hp-adaptive BE/FE methods to elastic scattering, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 37 (1994) 2893-2910.
11. P. Bettess, Infinite elements, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 11 (1977) 53-64.
12. D. Burnett, A 3D acoustic infinite element based on a generalized multipole expansion, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., submitted.
13. L. Demkowicz and K. Gerdes, Convergence of the infinite element methods for the Helmholtz equation, TICAM Report 95-07, May 1995.
14. I. Harari and T.J.R. Hughes, A cost comparison of boundary element and finite element methods for problems of time-harmonic structural acoustics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 97 (1992) 77-102.
15. I. Harari and T.J.R. Hughes, Design and analysis of finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation in exterior domains, Appl. Mech. Rev. 43(2) ASME (1990) 366-373.
16. I. Harari and T.J.R. Hughes, Analysis of continuous formulations underlying the computation of time-harmonic acoustics in exterior domains, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 97 (1992) 103-124.
17. I. Harari, Computational methods for problems of acoustics with particular reference to exterior domains, Ph.D. Dissertation, Division of Applied Mechanics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1991.
18. A. Bayliss and E. Turkel, Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 33 (1980) 707-725.
19. D. Givoli, Non-reflecting boundary conditions - a review, J. Comput. Phys. 94(1) (1991) 1-29.
20. D. Givoli and J.B. Keller, Non-reflecting boundary conditions for elastic waves, Wave Motion 12 (1990) 261-279.
21. M.J. Grote and J.B. Keller, On nonreflecting boundary conditions, J. Comp. Phys., to appear.
22. M.S. Shephard and M.K. Georges, Automatic three-dimensional mesh generation by the finite Octree technique, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 32 (1991) 709-749.
23. W.J. Schroeder and M.S. Shephard, An O(N) algorithm to automatically generate geometric triangulations satisfying the Delaunay circumsphere criteria, Engrg. Comput. 5 (1989) 177-193.
24. W.J. Schroeder and M.S. Shephard, A combined Octree/Delaunay method for fully automatic 2-D mesh generation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 29 (1990) 37-55.
25. J. Peraire, J. Peiro, L. Formaggia, K. Morgan and O.C. Zienkiewicz, Finite element Euler computations in three dimensions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 26 (1988) 2135-2159.
26. J.C. Cavendish, D.A. Field and W.H. Frey, An approach to automatic three-dimensional finite element mesh generation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 21 (1985) 329-347.
27. R. Löhner and P. Parihk, Generation of three dimensional grids by the advancing-front method, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 8 (1988) 1135-1149.
28. T.J. Baker, Automatic mesh generation for complex three-dimensional regions using a constrained Delaunay triangulation, Engrg. Comput. 5 (1989) 161-175.
29. T.D. Blacker and M.B. Stephenson, Paving: a new approach to automated quadrilateral mesh generation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 32 (1991) 811-847.
30. J. Peraire, M. Vahdati, K. Morgan and O.C. Zienkiewicz, Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations, J. Comput. Phys. 72 (1987) 449-466.
31. J.R. Stewart and T.J.R. Hughes, An a posteriori error estimator and hp-adaptive strategy for finite element discretizations of the Helmholtz equation in exterior domains, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., to appear.
32. J.R. Stewart, Adaptive finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation in exterior domains, Ph.D. Dissertation, Division of Applied Mechanics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1995.
33. C. Johnson and P. Hansbo, Adaptive finite element methods in computational mechanics, Comput. Methods in Appl. Mech. Engrg. 101 (1992) 143-181.
34. C. Johnson, Finite element methods for flow problems, in: AGARD Report 787 (AGARD, 7 Rue Ancelle, 92299 Neuilly sur Seine, France, 1992) 1-1-1-47.
35. K. Eriksson and C. Johnson, An adaptive finite element method for linear elliptic problems, Math. Comput. 50 (1988) 361-383.
36. C. Johnson, Adaptive finite element methods for diffusion and convection problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 82 (1990) 301-322.
37. E. Oñate and G. Bugeda, A study of mesh optimality criteria in adaptive finite element analysis, Engrg. Comput. 10 (1993) 307-321.
38. I. Harari and T.J.R. Hughes, Finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation in an exterior domain: model problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 87 (1991) 59-96.
39. F. Ihlenburg and I. Babuška, Finite element solution to the Helmholtz equation with high wave number, Part I: The h-p-version of the FEM, Technical Note BN-1173, Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland at College Park, 1994.
40. F. Ihlenburg and I. Babuška, Dispersion analysis and error estimation of Galerkin finite element methods for the numerical computation of waves. Technical Note, Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland at College Park, 1994.
41. J.R. Stewart and T.J.R. Hughes, Explicit residual-based a posteriori error estimation for finite element discretizations of the Helmholtz equation: Computation of the scaling constant and new measures of error estimator equality, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., to appear.