Living PSA-risk monitoring - Current use and developments

Nuclear Engineering and Design

Volumn 175, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 197-204

  Kafka, P ^a  

^a GESELLSCHAFT FÜR ANLAGEN UND REAKTORSICHERHEIT GRS MBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONITORING; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

RISK MONITORING;

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

EID: 0031549809     PISSN: 00295493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00037-X     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aizawa, K., Makai, R., 1994. Living PSA program: LIPSAS development for safety management of an LMFBR plant. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety 44 (3), 135-138.
2. Apostolakis, G., Kafka, P., (Eds.), 1990. The Role of Personal Computers in Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Decision Making, Elsevier Applied Science, Barking, UK, pp. 379-398.
3. Besi, A., Cacciabue, P.C., Papazoglou, I.A., 1994. The PSA/ STARS project: a set of integrated software tools for PSA evaluation and living PSA. 4th TÜV Workshop on Living PSA Application, Hamburg.
4. E. Böhme, Musekamp, W., Neumann, L., 1994. SAIS: a software tool for PSA and plant system safety analysis. 4th TÜV Workshop on Living PSA Application, Hamburg.
5. Dagan, W.J., Kalra, S.P., 1995. Outage risk assessment and management (ORAM): a computerized tool to help manage plant and equipment outages, in: PSA 1995 Proc., Seoul, pp. 1197-1204.
6. Dezfuli, H., Modarres, M., Meyer, J., 1994. Application of reveal TM to risk-based configuration control. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety 44 (3), 243-263.
7. Evans, M.G.K., 1994. The interface between a safety monitor and a reliability centred maintenance program, 4th TÜV Workshop on Living PSA Application, Hamburg.
8. Georgescu, G., 1994. Risk-based systems configuration monitoring system, conceptual model, PSA/PRA and Severe Accidents 1994. Ljublijana, Slovenia.
9. Granton, C.R., 1995. Implementation of risk management at nuclear power stations, in: PSA 1995 Proc., Seoul, pp. 387-391.
10. Guarro, S., Milici, A., 1993. Accident management advisor system (AMAS): a nuclear power plant computerized decision aid, in: Proc. of the International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, PSA 1993, Clearwater Beach, FL.
11. Hoertner, H., Kafka, P., Reichart, G., 1987. Evaluation of operating experience - the German precursor study, International Atomic Energy Agency, Case study I.
12. Hook, T.G., 1995. Use of the safety monitor in operations decision-making and the maintenance rule at San Onofre nuclear generating station, in: PSA 1995 Proc., Seoul, pp. 865-868.
13. Horne, B.E., 1988. The essential systems status monitor for Heysham 2 nuclear power station, International Atomic Energy Agency TCM, Vienna.
14. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1994. Modelling and data prerequisites for specific applications of PSA in the management of nuclear plant safety, IAEA-TECDOC-740.
15. Joksimovich, V., 1994. Where do we go from here in US nuclear safety regulation?, PSAM II, San Diego, CA.
16. Johanson, G., Holmberg, J. (Eds.), 1994. Safety Evaluation by Living Probabilistic Safety Assessment, Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, SKI Report 94:2.
17. Kafka, P., 1992. Living PSA-risk monitor: current developments. International Atomic Energy Agency TCM, Budapest, IAEA-TECDOC-737.
18. Kafka, P., Lupas, O., Wu, J. Zimmermann, M., 1993. A computer aid for safety assessment and configuration management of complex systems based on PSA models, PSAM II, San Diego, CA.
19. Kim, I.S., Martorell, S., Vesely, W.E. Samanta, P.K., 1992. Quantitative evaluation of surveillance test intervals including test-caused risks. NUREG/CR-5775, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
20. Kirkman, J.Q., Fussal, J.B., Campbell, D.J., 1988. PRISIM at Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit 1: daily, in-plant use of PSA information. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety 22, 441-454.
21. Kozuh, M., Mavko, B., 1994. Active use of the PSA results as a living PSA concept. 4th TÜV Workshop on Living PSA Application, Hamburg.
22. Levy, I.S., Vesely, W.E., 1991. Age-dependent risk-based methodology and its application to prioritization of nuclear power plant components and to maintenance for managing aging using PRAs. NUREG/CP-0113, Vol. 3, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
23. Leyshon-Jones, R., Preston, J.F., 1994. LPSA: Problem or panacea. 4th TÜV Workshop on Living PSA Application, Hamburg.
24. Morgen, T.A., 1993. Development and use of the San Onofre safety monitor. IAEA-J4-TC-855.
25. PRA, 1994. PRA Working Group, A review of NRS staff uses of probabilistic safety assessment. NUREG-1489, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
26. Perryman, L.J., Foster, N.A.S., Nicholls, D.R., 1994. Experiences in using a living PSA to support operation and maintenance decision making. 4th TÜV Workshop on Living PSA Application, Hamburg.
27. Poucet, A., 1990. STARS: knowledge based tools for safety and reliability analysis. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety, 30.
28. Puglia, W.J., Atefi, B., Gallagher, D.W., 1994. Use of probabilistic safety assessment for on-line maintenance planning and configuration management, Int. Meet. PSA/PRA and Severe Accidents 1994, Lublijana, Slovenia.
29. Putney, B., Riley, J., Cragg, C., Gough, W., Rahn, F., 1995. Application of EOOS on-line monitor, in: PSA 1995 Proc., Seoul, pp. 882-885.
30. Relcon AB/Sweden, 1992. Risk spectrum FT, Users Manual.
31. Riskman, 1989. Program demonstration by Pickard, Lowe and Garrick (PLG), Post SMIRT-10, Semin. No. 7, Los Angeles, CA.
32. Russels, K.D., Wood, S.T., Kvarfordt, K.J., 1993. The capabilities and application of the saphire 5.0 safety assessment software, NRC 21st Water Reactor Safety Meeting, Bethesda, NUREG/CP-0133, Vol. 1, pp. 375-394.
33. Samanta, P.K., Vesely, W.E., Kim, I.S., 1991. Study of operational risk-based configuration control, NUREG/CR-5641, BNL-NUREG-52261.
34. Samanta, P.K., Kim, I.S., Mankamo, T., Vesely, W.E., 1994. Handbook of methods for risk-based analyses of technical specifications, NUREG/CR-6141.
35. Sandstedt, J., 1993. Demonstration case studies on living PSA, in: Proc. Int. Topical Meet. on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, PSA 1993, Clearwater Beach, FL.
36. Singer, B., Lloyed, M., 1993. The development of a living PRA maintenance procedure, in: Proc. Int. Topical Meet. on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, PSA 1993, Clearwater Beach, FL.
37. Tomic, B., 1993. Risk-based optimization of maintenance -methods and approaches, in: Proc. ESREL 1993, München, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 259-267.
38. TÜV Norddeutschland, 1994. 4th TÜV Workshop on Living PSA Applications, Hamburg.
39. Uryasev, S., Vallerga, H., 1993. Optimization of test strategies: a general approach. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety 41 (2), 155-167.
40. Vesely, W.E., 1993. Quantifying maintenance effects on unavailability and risk using Markov modeling. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety 41 (2), 177-189.
41. Waddell, W.B., 1990. Operational experience of a reliability based maintenance strategy for the control of essential post-trip cooling plant in a nuclear power station. Semin. on Operational Reliability and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant (S 683).