Effect of counterion competition on micellar growth horizons for cetyltrimethylammonium micellar surfaces: Electrostatics and specific binding

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 101, Issue 40, 1997, Pages 7919-7927

  Magid, L J ^a   Han, Z ^a   Warr, G G ^b   Cassidy, M A ^b   Butler, P D ^c   Hamilton, W A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS; AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; ELECTROSTATICS; IONIC STRENGTH; MONOMERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SURFACE PHENOMENA;

CETYLTRIMETHYLAMMONIUM; COUNTERION MICELLAR GROWTH; SCREENING ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION;

MICELLES;

EID: 0031549595     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp970864f     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. (a) Cates, M. E.; Candau, S. J. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1990, 2, 6869 and references therein.
2. (b) Rehage, H.; Hoffmann, H. Mol. Phys. 1991, 74, 933 and references therein.
3. (c) Porte, G. in Micelles, Membranes, Microemulsions and Monolayers; Gelbart, W. M.; Ben-Shaul, A.; Roux, D., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1994; Chapter 2.
4. (a) Kalus, J.; Hoffmann, H.; Reizlein, K.; Ulbricht, W.; Ibel, K. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 37.
5. (b) Rehage, H.; Hoffmann, H. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1983, 76, 363.
6. (c) Hoffmann, H.; Rehage, H.; Reizlein, K. Thurn, H. Proceedings of the ACS Symposium on Macro-and Microemulsions; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1985; p 41.
7. (a) Wan, L. S. C. J. Pharm. Sci. 1966, 55, 1395.
8. (b) Gravsholt, S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1976, 57, 575.
9. (c) Ulmius, J.; Wennerström, H.; Johansson, L. B.-Å; Lindblom, G.; Gravsholt, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 2232.
10. Underwood, A. L.; Anacker, E. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 2390.
11. (b) J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1985, 106, 1985.
12. Imae, T.; Kohsaka, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 10030.
13. Shikata, T.; Hirata, H.; Kotaka, T. Langmuir 1988, 4, 354.
14. Lin, M. Y.; Hanley, H. J. M.; Sinha, S. K.; Straty, G. C.; Peiffer, D. G.; Kim, M. W. Phys. Rev. E. 1996, 53, R4302.
15. Carver, M.; Smith, T. L.; Gee, J. C.; Delichere, A.; Caponetti, E.; Magid, L. J. Langmuir 1996, 12, 691.
16. Soltero, J. F. A.; Puig, J. E. Langmuir 1996, 12, 2654.
17. Kaler, E. W.; Herrington, K. L.; Murthy, A. K.; Zasadzinski, J. A. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 6698.
18. Brown, W.; Johansson, K.; Almgren, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 5888.
19. Hassan, P. A.; Valaulikar, B. S.; Manohar, C.; Kern, F.; Bourdieu, L.; Candau, S. Langmuir 1996, 12, 4350.
20. Salkar, R. A.; Hassan, P. A.; Samant, S. D.; Valaulikar, B. S.; Kumar, V. V.; Kern, F.; Candau, S. J.; Manohar, C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1996, 1223.
21. Kern, F.; Lequeux, F.; Zana, R.; Candau, S. J. Langmuir 1994, 10, 1714.
22. Clausen, T. W.; Vinson, P. K.; Minter, J. R.; Davis, H. T.; Talmon, Y.; Miller, W. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 474.
23. Candau, S. J.; Khatory, A.; Lequeux, F.; Kern, F. J. Phys. IV (France) 1993, 3, 197.
24. (a) Khatory, A.; Lequeux, F.; Kern, F.; Candau, S. J.; Langmuir 1993, 9, 1456.
25. (b) Appell, J.; Porte, G.; Khatory, A.; Kern, F.; Candau, S. J. J. Phys. II (France) 1992, 2, 1045.
26. (c) Khatory, A.; Kern, F.; Lequeux, F.; Appell, J.; Porte, G.; Morie, N.; Ott, A.; Urbach, W. Langmuir 1993, 9, 933.
27. For an elegant application to CTASal micelles in 0.5 M NaCl, see: Berret, J.-F.; Appell, J.; Porte, G. Langmuir 1993, 9, 2851. Information on in the entangled regime is not available using scattering methods.
28. Butler, P. D.; Magid, L. J.; Hamilton, W. A.; Hayter, J. B.; Hammouda, B.; Kreke, P. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 442.
29. Hayter, J. B.; Penfold, J. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1983, 261, 1022.
30. Imae, T.; Ikeda, S. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1987, 265, 1090.
31. Quirion, F.; Magid, L. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 5435.
32. Imae, T.; Kamiya, R.; Ikeda, S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1985, 108, 215.
33. Delsanti, M.; Moussaid, A.; Munch, J. P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1993, 157, 285.
34. For a theoretical treatment of micellar growth in poorly screened solutions, see: (a) Safran, S.; Pincus, P.; Cates, M. E.; Mackintosh, F. J. Phys. (Paris) 1990, 51, 503. (b) Mackintosh, F.; Safran, S.; Pincus, P. Europhys. Lett. 1990, 12, 697.
35. For a theoretical treatment of micellar growth in poorly screened solutions, see: (a) Safran, S.; Pincus, P.; Cates, M. E.; Mackintosh, F. J. Phys. (Paris) 1990, 51, 503. (b) Mackintosh, F.; Safran, S.; Pincus, P. Europhys. Lett. 1990, 12, 697.
36. (a) Porte, G.; Appell, J.; Poggi, Y. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 3105.
37. (b) Porte, G.; Appell, J. In Surfactants in Solution; Mittal, K. L., Lindman, B., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1983; Vol. 2, p 805.
38. 1H NMR line widths (see: Mancini, G.; Schiavo, C.; Cerichelli, G. Langmuir 1996, 12, 3567) place the sphere-to-rod transition at 1.0-1.5 M NaCl for 0.03 M CTAB.
39. 1H NMR line widths (see: Mancini, G.; Schiavo, C.; Cerichelli, G. Langmuir 1996, 12, 3567) place the sphere-to-rod transition at 1.0-1.5 M NaCl for 0.03 M CTAB.
40. Hayter, J. B. Langmuir 1992, 8, 2873.
41. Morgan, J. D.; Napper, D. H.; Warr, G. G.; Nicol, S. K. Langmuir 1994, 10, 797.
42. (a) Manohar, C.; Rao, U. R. K.; Valaulikar, B. S.; Iyer, R. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 379.
43. (b) Rao, U. R. K.; Manohar, C.; Valaulikar, B. S.; Iyer, R. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 3286.
44. Smith, B. C.; Chou, L. C.; Zakin, J. L. J. Rheol. 1994, 38, 73.
45. (a) Bachofer, S. J.; Turbitt, R. M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1990, 135, 325.
46. (b) Bachofer, S. J.; Simonis, U. Langmuir 1996, 12, 1744.
47. Kreke, P. J.; Magid, L. J.; Gee, J. C. Langmuir 1996, 12, 699.
48. Duffy, D. C.; Davies, P. B.; Bain, C. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 15241.
49. Cassidy, M. A.; Warr, G. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 3237.
50. Israelachvili, J. N.; Mitchell, D. J.; Ninham, B. W. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1976, 72, 1525.
51. (a) Hayter, J. B.; Penfold, J. Mol. Phys. 1981, 42, 109.
52. (b) Hansen, J. P.; Hayter, J. B. Mol. Phys. 1982, 46, 651.
53. (a) Nicoli, D. F.; Athanassakis, V.; Moffatt, J. R.; Dorshow, R. B.; Bunton, C. A.; Savelli, G. In Surfactants in Solution; Mittal, K. L., Bothorel, P., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1986; Vol. 4, p 203.
54. (b) Ortega, F.; Bacaloglu, R.; McKenzie, D. C.; Bunton, C. A.; Nicoli, D. F. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 501.
55. Baba-Ahmed, L.; Benmouna, M.; Grimson, M. J. Phys. Chem. Liq. 1987, 16, 235.
56. Carver, M. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1984. The value of 0.36 given in ref 8 is in error.
57. Gunnarsson, G.; Jönsson, B.; Wennerström, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 3114.
58. Drummond, C. J.; Grieser, F.; Healy, T. W. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1986, 81, 95.
59. Johnson, S. B.; Drummond, C. J.; Scales, P. J.; Nishimura, S. Langmuir 1995, 11, 2367.
60. salt is in preparation.
61. 0's. Magid, L. J. In Ordering and Organizing in Ionic Solutions; Ise, N., Sogami, I., Eds., World Scientific Publishing Co.: Singapore, 1988; pp 288-301.
62. The observed shielding for 0.01 M CTA35ClBz is 0.36 ppm, ref 33; assuming α = 0.1 gives 0.40 ppm.