Experimental investigation of the destruction of 1 MeV 12CH2 molecules in single and double stripping foils

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms

Volumn 123, Issue 1-4, 1997, Pages 186-192

  Hughey, B J ^a   Shefer, R E ^a   Klinkowstein, R E ^a   Zhao, X L ^b   Kieser, W E ^b   Litherland, A E ^b  

^a Newton Scientific Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; ELECTRIC CHARGE; IONS; MOLECULAR BEAMS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENT; RADIOISOTOPES;

ACCELERATOR MASS SPECTROMETRY (AMS); CARBON STRIPPING FOILS;

MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 0031546958     PISSN: 0168583X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-583X(96)00408-9     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. B.J. Hughey, R.E. Klinkowstein, R.E. Shefer, P.L. Skipper, S.R. Tannenbaum and J.S. Wishnok, these Proceedings (AMS-7), Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 123 (1997) 153.
2. D.J.W. Mous et al., these Proceedings (AMS-7), Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 123 (1997) 159.
3. M. Suter, St. Jacob and H.A. Synal, these Proceedings (AMS-7), Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 123 (1997) 148.
4. H.W. Lee, A. Galindo-Uribarri, K.H. Change, L.R. Kilius and A.E. Litherland, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 5 (1984) 208.
5. A. Galindo-Uribarri, H.W. Lee and K.H. Chang, J. Chem. Phys. 83 (1985) 3685.
6. See papers contained in Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 194 (1982) 255.
7. D.S. Gemmell, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 194 (1982) 255.
8. N. Cue, N.V. de Castro-Faria, M.J. Gaillard, J.-C. Poizat, J. Remillieux, D.S. Gemmell and I. Plesser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 613.
9. W.E. Kieser, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 56/57 (1991) 868.
10. ACF Metals, 2239 E. Kleindale Road, Tucson, AZ 85719-2440.
11. J.F. Ziegler, TRIM-95, IBM, Yorktown, NY 10598.
12. 2 foil was the intact member of a broken double foil pair. Only the off-center magnetic field points are shown for this foil because surviving members of broken double foil pairs were observed to exhibit a higher degree of molecular attenuation than known single foils of similar thickness. This effect may be due to small pieces of the broken foil which adhered to the intact foil or to pieces of the broken foil remaining attached to the holder and intercepting a portion of the ion beam. Therefore, it was not possible to reliably characterize broken foil pairs as either single or double foils.
13. R.L. Auble, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Electrostatic Accelerator Technology, Oak Ridge, TN, April 13-16, 1981, p. 158.