Enhancement of the value of hip questionnaires by telephone follow-up evaluation

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 340-343

  McGrory, B J ^a   Shinar, A A ^a   Freiberg, A A ^a   Harris, W H ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

MOS 36 Item Short form Health Survey (SF 36); Outcome studies; Telephone call; Total hip arthroplasty; WOMAC osteoarthritis index

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELEPHONE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 0031544056     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90033-4     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-Item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473, 1992
2. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheum. 1:95, 1988
3. Bellamy N: WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a users guide. Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada, 1995
4. How to score the SF-36 health survey. Medical Outcomes Trust, Boston, 1993
5. McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Rand JA, Ilstrup DM: Correlation of patient questionnaire responses and physician history in grading clinical outcome following hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 201 joint arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 11:47, 1995
6. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty; an end-result stage using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 51A:737, 1969
7. Robinson, EJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH et al: Measurement of disability in orthopaedic surgery. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orlando, FL, 1995
8. Estok DM II, Harris WH: Long-term results of cemented femoral revision surgery using second-generation techniques: an average 11.7 year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 299:190, 1994
9. Stromberg CN, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L: Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old: clinical and radiologic results after 4 years. J Arthroplasty 3:47, 1988
10. Ware JE, Dacvies-Avery A, Brook RH: Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the health insurance study: Vol IV: Analysis of relationships among health status measures. Rand, Santa Monica, CA 1980