Commercial document suppliers: How many of the ILL/DD periodical article requests can they fulfill?

Library Trends

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 551-568

  Prabha, Chandra ^a   Marsh, Elizabeth C ^a  

^a OCLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031542538     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Association of Research Libraries. (1995). ARL annual statistics. Washington, DC: ARL.
2. Association of Research Libraries. (1995). ARL awarded grant to measure the performance of interlibrary loan and document delivery. Press Release (June 21, 1995).
3. Association of Research Libraries. Office of Management Services. (1994). SPEC survey -Uses of commercial document delivery services (p. 4). In M. E. Jackson (Comp.), Uses of document delivery services. Washington, DC: ARL.
4. Baker, S. K., & Jackson, M. E. (1992). Maximizing access, minimizing cost: A first step toward the information access future. Washington, DC: ARL Committee on Access to Information Resources, Association of Research Libraries.
5. Cornish, G. P. (1991). Document supply in the new information environment. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 23(3), 126-133.
6. Farr, M., & Brown, B. (1991). Explosive ILL growth at the University of Montana: A case study. Journal of Interlibrary Loan & Information Supply, 2(2), 41-54.
7. Higginbotham, B. B., & Bowdoin, S. (1993). Access versus assets. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
8. Hurd, D. P., & Molyneux, R. E. (1986). An evaluation of delivery times and costs of a nonlibrary document delivery service. In D. A. Nitecki (Ed.), Energies for transition (Proceedings of the fourth national conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association.
9. Kelsey, A. L., & Davenport, D. M. (1993). Information express: The use of commercial document delivery in the county college of Morris LRC. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19(5), 310-312.
10. Leach, R. G., & Tribble, J. E. (1993). Electronic document delivery: New options for libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 18(6), 359-364.
11. McFarland, R. T. (1992). A comparison of science related document delivery services. In C. A. Steinke (Ed.), Sci-tech libraries of the future. New York: Haworth Press, Inc.
12. Mancini, A. D. (1996). Evaluating commercial document suppliers: Improving access to current journal literature. College & Research Libraries, 57(3), 123-131.
13. Miller, C., & Tegler, P. (1988). An analysis of interlibrary loan and commercial document supply performance. Library Quarterly, 58(4), 352-366.
14. Mitchell, E., & Walters, S. A. (1995). Document delivery services: Issues and answers. Medford, NJ: Learned Information, Inc.
15. Pedersen, W., & Gregory, D. (1994). Interlibrary loan and commercial document supply: Finding the right fit. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 20(5/6), 263-272.
16. Roche, M. M. (1993). ARL/RLG interlibrary loan cost study. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
17. Seaman, S. (1992). An examination of unfilled OCLC lending and photocopy requests. Information Technology and Libraries, 11(3), 229-235.
18. Williams, B. W., & Hubbard, J. G. (1991). Interlibrary loan and collection management applications of an ILL database management system. Journal of Interlibrary Loan & Information Supply, 1(3), 63-90.