Research and evaluation in information retrieval

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 51-57

  Robertson, S E ^a   Beaulieu, M ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031541821     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000007190     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Cleverdon, C.W., Mills, J. and Keen, E.M. Factors determining the performance of indexing systems. Cranfield: College of Aeronautics, 1966.
2. Lancaster, F.W. Evaluation of the MEDLARS Demand Search Service. Bethesda, MD.: National Library of Medicine, 1968.
3. Cleverdon, C.W. Report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems. Cranfield: College of Aeronautics, 1962.
4. Sparck Jones, K., ed. Information retrieval experiment. London: Butterworths, 1981.
5. Robertson, S.E. and Hancock-Beaulieu, M.M. On the evaluation of IR systems. Information Processing and Management, 28, 1992, 457-466.
6. Singhal, A., Buckley, C. and Mitra, M. Pivoted document length normalization. In: Frei, H-P., Harman, D., Schauble, P. and Wilkinson, R., eds. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Zurich 1996. ACM, 1996, 21-29.
7. Beaulieu, M., Robertson, S. and Rasmussen, E. Evaluating interactive systems in TREC. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47, 1996, 85-94.
8. Robertson, S.E. On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation, 46, 1990, 359-364.