Action research in youth soccer: Assessing the acceptability of an alternative program

Journal of Sport Management

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 29-44

  Green, B Christine ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031541653     PISSN: 08884773     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.11.1.29     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D.M. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Chalip, L. (1989). The postseason assessment survey: A simple tool for sports organisation development. New Zealand Journal of Sports Medicine, 17(2), 28-31.
3. Chalip, L. (1990). Rethinking the applied social sciences of sport: Observations on the emerging debate. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7, 172-178.
4. Chase, M.A., Ewing, M.E., Lirgg, C.D., & George, T.R. (1994). The effects of equipment modification on children's self-efficacy and basketball shooting performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 109-116.
5. Chelladurai, P. (1984). Discrepancy between preferences and perceptions of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 27-41.
6. Devereaux, E. (1976). Backyard versus little league baseball: The impoverishment of children's games. In D. Landers (Ed.), Social problems in athletics (pp. 37-56). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.