The effect of lamp color on the visibility of small targets

Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 173-181

  Janoff, M S ^a   Havard, J A ^b  

^a General Electric Co ^*  (United States)

^b GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOR; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; PHOTOMETRY; VISIBILITY;

LAMP COLOR;

FLUORESCENT LAMPS;

EID: 0031540661     PISSN: 00994480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00994480.1997.10748177     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. BermanS.M. 1992. Energy efficiency consequences of scotopic sensitivity. J of the LES 21(no. 1):3–14.
2. JanoffM.S. and HavardJ.A. 1995. Alternative targets for roadway lighting research. Hendersonville, NC:General Electric Company.
3. JanoffM.S. 1992. The relationship between visibility Level and subjective ratings of visibility. J of the IES 21(no. 2):98–107.
4. JanoffM.S. 1989. Subjective ratings of visibility and alternative measures of roadway lighting. J of the IES. 18(no. 1):17–28.
5. JanoffM.S. 1994. Subjective ratings of visibility in the Phoenix tunnel. Proceedings of the 1994 IESNA Annual Conference.
6. JanoffM.S., et al. 1984. Pavement roughness and ride quality. Washington, D.C.:NCHRP Report 275, 4–8.
7. JanoffM.S., et al. 1977. Effectiveness of Highway Arterial Lighting. Final Report FHWA-RD-77–37. Washington, D.C.:Federal Highway Administration.
8. LeCoqJ. 1993. The application of the visibility level to hemispherical and multifaceted targets. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Visibility and Luminance in Roadway Lighting. Orlando, FL.
9. AdrianW. 1993. The physiological basis of the visibility concept. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Visibility and Luminance in Roadway Lighting. Orlando, FL.
10. KeckM. VL–MAN2 computer program. Vicksburg, MS:Jolinko Enterprises.