The social construction of scientific evidence

Journal of Constructivist Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 75-96

  Sargent, Rose Mary ^a  

^a MERRIMACK COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031540162     PISSN: 10720537     EISSN: 15210650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10720539708404612     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bacon, F. (1860-1864). The New Atlantis, In J. Spedding et al. (Eds.), The works of Francis Bacon (vol. 5). Boston: Taggard and Thompson. (Original work published 1626)
2. Bacon, F. (1860-1864). The new organon. In J. Spedding et al. (Eds.), The works of Francis Bacon (vol. 8). Boston: Taggard and Thompson. (Original work published 1621)
3. Bloor, D. (1982). Durkheim and Mauss revisited: Classification and the sociology of knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 13, 267-297.
4. Bloor, D. (1984). The sociology of reasons: Or why “epistemic factors” are really “social factors.” In J. R. Brown (Ed.), Scientific rationality: The sociological turn (pp. 295-324). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
5. Bloor, D. (1992). Left and right Wittgensteinians. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 266-282). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Boyle, R. (1966). The works of the honourable Robert Boyle (6 vols., facsimile edition). Hildesheim, Germany: Georg Olms. (Original work published 1772)
7. Boyle, R. (1991). The letters and papers of Robert Boyle [microfilm], Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America.
8. Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Descartes, R. (1985). Discourse on the method. In The philosophical writings of Descartes (vol. 1; Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1636)
10. Duhem, P. (1981). The aim and structure of physical theory (P. P. Wiener, Trans.). New York: Atheneum. (Original work published 1914)
11. Fine, A. (1992). Science made up: Constructivist sociology of scientific knowledge. In P. Galison & D. Stump (Eds.), Disunity and contextualism in the philosophy of science (pp. 31-52). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Franklin, A. (1986). The neglect of experiment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Franklin, A, (1993). Experimental questions. Perspective on Science, 1, 127-146.
14. Galison, P. (1987). How experiments end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Gooding, D. (1992). Putting agency back into experiment. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 65-112). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Hacking, 1. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hacking, I. (1989). Philosophers of experiment. In PSA 1988 (Vol. 2, pp. 147-156). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
19. Hacking, 1. (1992). The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 29-64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hull, D. L. (1995). [Review of the book The Golem], Philosophy of Science, 62, 487-488.
22. Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Kosso, P. (1992). Reading the book of nature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Lakatos, I. (1974). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? No. Simply amodem! Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21, 145-171.
27. Latour, B. (1992). One more turn after the social turn In E. McMullin (Ed.), The social dimensions of science (pp. 272-294). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
28. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Latour, B. (In press). Do scientific objects have a history too? An encounter between Pasteur and Whitehead in a lactic acid bath. In The Berliner key and other essays of a science watcher. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: Shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
31. Lynch, M. (1992). Extending Wittgenstein. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 215-265). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Nickles, T. (1995). Philosophy of science and history of science. Osiris, 10, 139-163.
33. Pascal, B. (1937). The physical treatises of Pascal (I. H. B. Spiers & A. G. H. Spiers, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1663)
34. Peirce, C. S. (1966). “What Pragmatism Is.” The Monist 15: 161-181. Reprinted in P. P. Wiener (Ed.) Charles S. Peirce: Selected Writings. New York: Dover, 1966.
35. Pera, M. (1994). The discourses of science (Clarissa Botsford, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Perez-Ramos, A. (1988). Francis Bacon's idea of science and the makers’ knowledge tradition. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
37. Pickering, A. (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Polyani, M. (1964). Personal knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.
39. Popper, K. R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper and Row.
40. Quine, W. V. O. (1953). In From a logical point of view. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Sargent, R.-M. (1986). Robert Boyle’s Baconian inheritance: A response to Laudan’s Cartesian thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17, 469-486.
42. Sargent, R.-M. (1988). Explaining the success of science. In A. Fine and J. Leplin (Eds.), PSA 1988 (Vol. 1, pp. 55-63). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
43. Sargent, R.-M. (1989). Scientific experiment and legal expertise: The way of experience in seventeenth-century England. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 20, 19-45.
44. Sargent, R.-M. (1995). The diffident naturalist: Robert Boyle and the philosophy of experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Sargent, R.-M. (1996). Bacon as an advocate for cooperative scientific research. In The Cambridge companion to Bacon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Shapin, S. (1980). Social uses of science. In G. S. Rousseau and R. Porter (Eds), Ferment of knowledge (pp. 93-139). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Shapin, S. (1982). History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of Science, 20, 157-211.
48. Shapin, S. (1988a). The house of experiment in seventeenth-century England. Isis, 79, 373-404.
49. Shapin, S. (1988b). Robert Boyle and mathematics. Science in Context, 2, 23-58.
50. Shapin, S. (1992). [Review of the book The rational and the social]. Philosophy of Science, 59, 712-713.
51. Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Solomon, M. (1995). The pragmatic turn in naturalistic philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 3, 206-230.
54. Woolgar, S. (1992). Some remarks about positivism. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 342-372). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.