Dynamic cursor gain and tactual feedback in the capture of cursor movements

Ergonomics

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 1287-1298

  Keyson, D V ^a  

^a Institute for Perception Research Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Gain; Navigation; Tactual feedback; Target acquisition

Indexed keywords

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

TACTUAL FEEDBACK;

ERGONOMICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; EYE TRACKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

EID: 0031539288     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/001401397187379     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Akamatsu, A. and Mackenzie, S. I. 1996, Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedback, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 483-493.
2. Akamatsu, A. and Sato, S. 1994, A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 443-453.
3. Akamatsu, A., Sato, S. and Mackenzie, S. I. 1994, Multimodal mouse: a mouse-type device with tactile and force display, Presence, 3, 73-80.
4. Arnaut, L. Y. and Greenstein, J. S. 1990, Is display/control gain a useful metric for optimizing an interface? Human Factors, 32, 651-663.
5. Buck, L. 1980, Motor performance in relation to control-display gain and target width, Ergonomics, 23, 579-589.
6. Egel, F. L., Goossens, P. H. and Haakma, R. 1994, Improved efficiency through I-and E-feedback: a trackball with contextual force feedback, International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 41, 949-974.
7. Fitts, P. M. 1954, The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103-112.
8. Gibbs, C. B. 1962, Controller design: interactions of controlling limbs, time lags, and gain in positional and velocity systems, Ergonomics, 5, 385-402.
9. Hammerton, M. 1962, An investigation into the optimal gain of a velocity control system, Ergonomics, 5, 539-543.
10. Institute For Perception Research. 1996, Studies on factual feedback in target acquisition.
11. Jenkins, W. L. and Connor, M. B. 1949, Some design factors in making settings on a linear scale, Journal of Applied Psychology, 33, 395-409.
12. Jordan, T. C. 1972, Characteristics of visual and proprioceptive response times in the learning of motor skills, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 536-543.
13. Keele, S. W. 1986, Motor control, in K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J. P. Thomas (eds), Handbook of Perception and Performance, (Wiley, New York), 30-1-30-60.
14. Mackenzie, S. I. 1992, Movement time prediction in human-computer interfaces, Proceedings of Graphics Interface 92, Volume 7, University of Guelph, 140-150.
15. Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL).
16. Varney, N. R. and Benton, A. L. 1975, Tactile perception of direction in relation to handedness and familial handedness, Neuropsychologia, 13, 449-454.
17. Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K. and Hudson, S. 1997, Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursor and sticky icons, Proceedings of the CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 266-271.