Is the ADA Successful? Indicators for Tracking Gains

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 549, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 129-147

  Collignon, Frederick C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031537865     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716297549001010     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Judith Innes, Knowledge and Public Policy: The Search for Meaningful Indicators, 2d ed. (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, 1990).
2. Berkeley Planning Associates, “A Study of Accommodations Provided to Handicapped Employees by Federal Contractors” (Report prepared for U.S. Department of Labor, Oct. 1982).
3. Urban Institute, “Report of the Comprehensive Needs Study” (Report prepared for U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare [DHEW], 1975).
4. Saad Z. Nagi, An Epidemiology of Disability Among Adults in the United States (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1975).
5. Urban Institute, Report of the Comprehensive Needs Study.
6. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Implementing the Rehabilitation Act of 1973: The VR Program Response” (Report prepared for Audit Agency and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, DHEW, 1978).
7. Andrejs Skaburskis and Frederick C. Collignon, “The Use of Production Functions in Program Evaluation: An Assessment of the Vocational Rehabilitation Program,” Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, pp. 1-24 (Sept. 1991).
8. A. M. Pope and A. R. Tarlov, Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991).
9. Edward D. Berkowitz, Disability Policies and Government Programs (New York: Praeger, 1979).
10. Lawrence Haber, “Trends and Demographic Studies on Programs for Disabled Persons,” in Social Influences on Rehabilitation Planning, ed. Leonard G. Perlman and Gary F. Austin (Alexandria, VA: National Rehabilitation Association, 1985), pp. 27-37.
11. Edward Yelin et al., “Toward an Epidemiology of Work Disability,” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 58(3):386-415 (1980).
12. Richard V. Burkhauser and Robert H. Haveman, Disability and Work: The Economics of American Policy (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982).
13. Sheldon Danziger, Robert H. Haveman, and Robert Plotnick, “How Income Transfers Affect Work, Savings and the Income Distribution,” Journal of Economic Literature, 19: 975-1028 (Sept. 1981).
14. Paul Fenn, “Sickness Duration, Residual Disability and Income Replacement,” Economic Journal, 91: 158-73 (Mar. 1981).
15. Robert H. Haveman and Barbara L. Wolfe, “Disability Transfers and Early Retirement: A Causal Relationship?” Journal of Public Economics, 24: 47-66 (1984).
16. Jonathan S. Leonard, “Labor Supply Incentives and Disincentives for Disabled Persons,” in Disability and the Labor Market, ed. Monroe Berkowitz and M. Anne Hill (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1986), pp. 64-94.
17. Robert H. Haveman, Victor Halberstadt, and Richard V. Burkhauser, eds., Public Policy Toward Disabled Workers: Cross-National Analyses of Economic Impacts (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).
18. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Design for a Comprehensive Study of the Federal-State Vocational Rehabilitation Program” (Report submitted to Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Education, June 1989).
19. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Development of Performance Measures for Supported Employment Programs” (Report prepared for U.S. National Institute of Handicapped Research, July 1986).
20. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Alternative Conceptual Approaches to Standards” (Report prepared for Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, 1977).
21. Berkeley Planning Associates, “VR Program Evaluation Standards: A Critique of the State of the Art” (Report prepared for Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, 1977).
22. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Design for a Comprehensive Study”.
23. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Development of Performance Measures”.
24. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Alternative Conceptual Approaches to Standards”.
25. Berkeley Planning Associates, “VR Program Evaluation Standards: A Critique.”
26. Monroe Berkowitz et al., “Enhanced Understanding of the Economics of Disability” (Report to the U.S. National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 1988).
27. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Evaluation of Coordinated Community-Oriented Long Term Care Demonstration Projects” (Report to Health Care Financing Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, May 1985).
28. Berkeley Planning Associates, Evaluation of the ACCESS: Medical Long-Term Care Demonstration Project (Report to Health Care Financing Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Oct. 1986).
29. Urban Institute, Report of the Comprehensive Needs Study (Report prepared for Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, May 1975).
30. Berkeley Planning Associates, “In Search of Standards for Independent Living” (Report submitted to Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, Mar. 1978).
31. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Measuring and Valuing Independent Living Impacts: A Methodological Review” (Report submitted to California Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, 1978).
32. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Evaluation of the Title VII Part B Centers for Independent Living Program” (Report submitted to Rehabilitation Services Administration, U.S. Department of Education, 1986).
33. Joseph B. Moriarty, The Preliminary Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ) (Morgantown: West Virginia Research and Training Center, 1991).
34. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Design for a Comprehensive Study.”
35. Berkeley Planning Associates, “The VR Program Evaluation Standards: Final Report” (Report prepared for Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, Nov. 1978).
36. D. H. Dean and R. C. Dolan, “Assessing the Role of Vocational Rehabilitation in Disability Policy,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(4):568-87 (1991).
37. W. E. Gibbs, “Alternative Measures to Evaluate the Impact of Vocational Rehabilitation,” Rehabilitation Counseling, 34(1):33-43 (1990).
38. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Analysis of Program Trends and Performance in the Federal-State Vocational Rehabilitation Program” (Report prepared for Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Education, July 1989).
39. Frederick C. Collignon, “Benefit-Cost Analyses Conducted by State Agencies,” in Measuring the Efficiency of Public Programs: Costs and Benefits in Vocational Rehabilitation, ed. Monroe Berkowitz (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1988).
40. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Development of Performance Measures.”
41. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Vocational Rehabilitation Program Standards Evaluation System,” vol. 2, “Using the System: An Analytic Paradigm” (Report prepared for Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, Nov. 1982).
42. Berkeley Planning Associates, “VR Program Evaluation Standards: Final Report.”
43. Ronald Conley, The Economics of Mental Retardation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973).
44. Ronald Conley, The Economics of Vocational Rehabilitation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965).
45. Collignon, “Benefit-Cost Analyses.”
46. Berkeley Planning Associates, “A Benefit-Cost Analysis of the FY1985 Federal-State Vocational Rehabilitation Program, Including a Model for Ongoing Program Use” (Report prepared for Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Education, Apr. 1989).
47. Berkowitz, ed., Measuring the Efficiency of Public Programs, esp. the chapter by John D. Worrall.
48. John H. Noble, “The Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis as a Guide to Priority-Setting in Rehabilitation,” Evaluation Quarterly, 1: 347-80 (1977).
49. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Design for a Comprehensive Study.” More generally for social programs.
50. Human Services Research Institute and Berkeley Planning Associates, “Assuring the Quality of Human Services: A Conceptual Analysis” (Report prepared for Office of Human Development Services, DHEW, Jan. 1980).
51. Abt Associates, “The Program Services and Support System of the Rehabilitation Services Administration” (Report prepared for Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, 1974).
52. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Implementing the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.” The first new federal study with primary data collection for a national sample is imminent.
53. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Taxpayer Payback Analyses of Vocational Rehabilitation Services Provided by the California Department of Rehabilitation” (Report prepared for California Department of Rehabilitation, 1978).
54. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Design for a Comprehensive Study.” For a review and evaluation of applications using clinician assessments in related fields.
55. Berkeley Planning Associates, Marin County Demonstration to Create an Integrated System of Employment and Mental Health Services for Those with Mental Illness Histories (Report prepared for U.S. National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research and Marin Community Foundation, 1987).
56. Berkeley Planning Associates, Testing Measures of Performance for Protective Services (Report prepared for State of Michigan Department of Social Services, Apr. 1981).
57. Berkeley Planning Associates, Evaluation of the Joint OCD/SRS Demonstration Projects in Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 3 (Report prepared for National Center for Health Services Research, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, DHEW, Dec. 1977).
58. Arline Markowitz, ed., Moving Disabled Persons into the Workplace (Washington, DC: National Alliance of Business, 1984).
59. John H. Noble and Frederick C. Collignon, “Systems Barriers to Supported Employment for Persons with Chronic Mental Illness,” Psycho-Social Rehabilitation Journal, pp. 25-44 (Oct. 1987).
60. Urban Institute, Refinement and Expansion of VR Standards (Report to Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, Aug. 1976).
61. Berkeley Planning Associates, VR Program Evaluation Standards: A Critique.
62. Sanford E. Rubin, ed., Studies in the Evaluation of State Vocational Rehabilitation Agency Programs (Fayetteville: University of Arkansas, Arkansas Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, Nov. 1975).
63. JWK International Corporation, “Vocational Rehabilitation Performance Evaluation Standards Study” (Report to Rehabilitation Services Administration, DHEW, Aug. 1975).
64. Robert Bellah et al., The Good Society (New York: Knopf, 1991), chap. 3.
65. National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Economic Justice for All: Pastoral Letter on Catholic Social Teaching and the U.S. Economy (Washington, DC: National Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1986).
66. R. Bruininks and C. K. Lakin, eds., Living and Learning in the Least Restrictive Environment (Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 1984).
67. Berkeley Planning Associates, “Marin County Demonstration”.
68. Sharp Rehabilitation Center and Berkeley Planning Associates, “Evaluation of Rehabilitation Services to Head Injury Trauma Victims” (Report prepared for U.S. National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 1992-94).
69. J. Hill and M. Shafer, “Research Protocol of Quality of Life Factors in Competitive Employment for Severely Disabled Individuals” (Manuscript, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1984).
70. K. Keith and R. L. Schalock, Quality of Life Questionnaire and Index (Lincoln, NE: Governor's Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities, 1984).
71. Moriarty, Preliminary Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ).
72. Berkeley Planning Associates, Use of the Social Security Data-Link for Assessing the Impact of the Federal-State Vocational Rehabilitation Program (Report prepared for Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Education, Jan. 1989).
73. General Accounting Office, Vocational Rehabilitation: Evidence for Federal Program's Effectiveness Is Mixed, Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Select Education and Civil Rights, Committee on Education and Labor, U.S. House of Representatives, 1993.
74. General Accounting Office, Vocational Rehabilitation Program: Client Characteristics, Services Received and Employment Outcomes, testimony of Acting Director Robert York to Subcommittee on Select Education, Committee on Education and Labor, U.S. House of Representatives, 12 Nov. 1991.