Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales: Which are better?

Sociological Methods and Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 318-340

  Alwin, Duane F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031537636     PISSN: 00491241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0049124197025003003     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Alwin, D. F. 1974. "Approaches to the Interpretation of Relationships in the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix." Pp. 79-105 in Sociological Methodology 1973-74, edited by H. L. Costner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. _. 1988. "Structural Equation Models in Research on Human Development and Aging." Pp. 71-170 in Methodological Issues in Aging Research, edited by K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. Meredith, and S. C. Rawlings. New York: Springer.
3. _. 1989. "Problems in the Estimation and Interpretation of the Reliability of Survey Data." Quality and Quantity 23:277-331.
4. _. 1991. "Research on Survey Quality." Sociological Methods & Research 20:3-29.
5. _. 1992. "Information Transmission in the Survey Interview: Number of Response Categories and the Reliability of Attitude Measurement." Pp. 83-118 in Sociological Methodology 1992, edited by P. V. Marsden. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
6. Alwin, D. F. and D. J. Jackson. 1979. "Measurement Models for Response Errors in Surveys." Pp. 68-119 in Sociological Methodology 1980, edited by P. V. Marsden. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Alwin, D. F. and J. A. Krosnick. 1985. "The Measurement of Values in Surveys: A Comparison of Ratings and Rankings." Public Opinion Quarterly 48:409-42.
8. _. 1991. "The Reliability of Attitudinal Survey Measures: The Role of Question and Respondent Attributes." Sociological Methods & Research 20:139-81.
9. Andrews, F. M. 1984. "Construct Validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A Structural Modeling Approach." Public Opinion Quarterly 46:409-42.
10. _. 1990. "Construct Validity and Error Components of Survey Measures: A Structural Modeling Approach." Pp. 15-51 in Evaluation of Measurement Instruments by Meta-Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Studies, edited by W. E. Saris and A. van Meurs. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
11. Andrews, F. M. and S. B. Withey. 1976. Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality. New York: Plenum.
12. Benson, P. H. 1971. "How Many Scales and How Many Categories Shall We Use in Consumer Research? A Comment." Journal of Marketing 35:59-61.
13. Bentler, P. M. and D. G. Bonett. 1980. "Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures." Psychological Bulletin 88:588-606.
14. Birkett, N. J. 1986. "Selecting the Number of Response Categories for a Likert-Type Scale." In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Section on Survey Research Methods). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
15. Bradburn, N. and C. Danis. 1984. "Potential Contributions of Cognitive Research to Questionnaire Design." Pp. 101-29 in Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines, edited by T. B. Jabine, M. L. Straf, J. M. Tanur, and R. Tourangeau. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Browne, M. W. 1984. "The Decomposition of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices." British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37:1-21.
17. Campbell, A. and P. E. Converse. 1980. The Quality of American Life: 1978 Codebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
18. Campbell, D. T. and D. W. Fiske. 1959. "Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix." Psychological Bulletin 6:81-105.
19. Center for Political Studies. 1994. Continuity Guide to the American National Election Studies, 1952-1993. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
20. Champney, H. and H. Marshall. 1939. "Optimal Refinement of the Rating Scale." Journal of Applied Psychology 23:323-31.
21. Converse, J. M. and S. Presser. 1986. Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Converse, J. M. and H. Schuman. 1984. "The Manner of Inquiry: An Analysis of Survey Question Form Across Organizations and Over Time." Pp. 283-316 in Surveying Subjective Phenomena, Vol. 2, edited by C. F. Turner and E. Martin. New York: Russell Sage.
23. Costner, H. L. 1969. "Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence." American Journal of Sociology 75:245-63.
24. Cox, E. P., III. 1980. "The Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for a Scale: A Review." Journal of Marketing Research 17:407-22.
25. Cronbach, L. J. 1946. "Response Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design." Educational and Psychological Measurement 6:475-94.
26. _. 1950. "Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design." Educational and Psychological Measurement 10:3-31.
27. _. 1951. "Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests." Psychometrika 16:297-334.
28. Cunningham, W. H., I.C.M. Cunningham, and R. T. Green. 1977. "The Ipsative Process to Reduce Response Set Bias." Public Opinion Quarterly 41:379-84.
29. Davis, J. A. and T. W. Smith. 1995. General Social Surveys, 1972-1995: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
30. Feather, N. T. 1973. "The Measurement of Values: Effects of Different Assessment Procedures." Australian Journal of Psychology 25:221-31.
31. Ferguson, L. W. 1941. "A Study of the Likert Technique of Attitude Scale Construction." Journal of Social Psychology 13:51-57.
32. Finn, R. H. 1972. "Effects of Some Variations in Rating Scale Characteristics on Means and Reliabilities of Ratings." Educational and Psychological Measurement 32:255-65.
33. Garner, W. R. 1960. "Rating Scales, Discriminability, and Information Transmission." Psychological Review 67:343-52.
34. Garner, W. R. and H. W. Hake. 1951. "The Amount of Information in Absolute Judgements." Psychological Review 58:446-59.
35. Green, P. E. and V. R. Rao. 1970. "Rating Scales and Information Recovery: How Many Scales and Response Categories to Use?" Journal of Marketing 34:33-39.
36. Guilford, J. P. 1954. Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. Hamilton, D. L. 1968. "Personality Attributes Associated With Extreme Response Set." Psychological Bulletin 72:406-22.
38. Heise, D. R. 1969a. "Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest Correlations." American Sociological Review 34:93-101.
39. _. 1969b. "Some Methodological Issues in Semantic Differential Research." Psychological Bulletin 72:406-22.
40. Heise, D. R. and G. W. Bohrnstedt. 1970. "Validity, Invalidity, and Reliability." Pp. 104-29 in Sociological Methodology 1970, edited by E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Jabine, T. B., M. L. Straf, J. M. Tanur, and R. Tourangeau. 1984. Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines (report of the Advanced Research Seminar on Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology, Committee on National Statistics, and Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Jacoby, J. and M. S. Matell. 1971. "Three-Point Scales Are Good Enough." Journal of Marketing Research 8:495-500.
43. Jahoda, M., M. Deutsch, and S. W. Cook. 1951. Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Dryden.
44. Jenkins, G. D., Jr. and T. D. Taber. 1977. "A Monte Carlo Study of Factors Affecting Three Indices of Composite Scale Reliability." Journal of Applied Psychology 62:392-98.
45. Jöreskog, K. G. 1971. "Statistical Analysis of Sets of Congeneric Tests." Psychometrika 36:109-33.
46. Jöreskog, K. G. and D. Sörbom. 1986. LISREL: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood (user's guide, Version 6). Chicago: Scientific Software Inc.
47. Komorita, S. S. 1963. "Attitude Content, Intensity, and the Neutral Point on a Likert Scale." Journal of Social Psychology 61:327-34.
48. Komorita, S. S. and W. K. Graham. 1965. "Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of Scales." Educational and Psychological Measurement 25:987-95.
49. Krosnick, J. A. and D. F. Alwin. 1989. "Response Strategies for Coping With the Cognitive Demands of Survey Questions." Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
50. Lehman, D. R. and J. Hulbert. 1972. "Are Three-Point Scales Always Good Enough?" Journal of Marketing Research 9:444-46.
51. Likert, R. 1932. "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes." Archives of Psychology, No. 140.
52. Lissitz, R. W. and S. B. Green. 1975. "Effect of the Number of Scale Points on Reliability: A Monte Carlo Approach." Journal of Applied Psychology 60:10-13.
53. Lord, F. M. and M. R. Novick. 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54. Mattell, M. S. and J. Jacoby. 1971. "Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity." Educational and Psychological Measurement 31:657-74.
55. _. 1972. "Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Effects of Testing Time and Scale Properties." Journal of Applied Psychology 56:506-9.
56. McKennell, A. 1974. "Surveying Attitude Structures." Quality and Quantity 7:1-96.
57. Messick, S. 1968. "Response Sets." Pp. 492-96 in The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 13, edited by D. L. Sills. New York: Macmillan.
58. Miller, G. A. 1956. "The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information." Psychological Review 63:81-97.
59. Miller, W. E. 1982. American National Election Study, 1980. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
60. Murphy, G. and R. Likert. 1938. Public Opinion and the Individual: A Psychological Study of Student Attitudes on Political Questions, With a Retest Five Years Later. New York: Russell & Russell.
61. Osgood, C. E., G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
62. Peabody, D. 1962. "Two Components in Bi-Polar Scales: Direction and Extremeness." Psychological Review 69:65-73.
63. Ramsay, J. O. 1973. "The Effect of Number of Categories in Rating Scales on Precision of Estimation of Scale Values." Psychometrika 38:513-32.
64. Saris, W. E. 1988. Variation in Response Functions: A Source of Measurement Error in Attitude Research. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Sociometric Research Foundation.
65. Saris, W. E. and A. van Meurs. 1990. Evaluation of Measurement Instruments by Meta-Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Studies. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
66. Scherpenzeel, A. 1995. "A Question of Quality: Evaluating Survey Questions by Multitrait-Multimethod Studies." Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
67. Schuman, H. and S. Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.
68. Shannon, C. and W. Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
69. Sherif, C. W., M. Sherif, and R. E. Nebergall. 1965. Attitude and Attitude Change. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
70. Sudman, S., N. M. Bradburn, and N. Schwarz. 1996. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71. Symonds, P. M. 1924. "On the Loss of Reliability in Ratings Due to Coarseness of the Scale." Journal of Experimental Psychology 7:456-61.
72. Tourangeau, R. 1984. "Cognitive Sciences and Survey Methods." Pp. 73-100 in Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines, edited by T. B. Jabine, M. L. Straf, J. M. Tanur, and R. Tourangeau. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
73. Turner, C. F. and E. Martin. 1984. Surveying Subjective Phenomena. New York: Russell Sage.
74. Weisberg, H. F. and A. H. Miller. n.d. Evaluation of the Feeling Thermometer: A Report to the National Election Study Board Based on Data From the 1979 Pilot Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Political Studies, Institute for Social Research.
75. Werts, C. E. and R. L. Linn. 1970. "Path Analysis: Psychological Examples." Psychological Bulletin 74:194-212.
76. Woelfel, J. and E. Fink. 1980. The Measurement of Communication Processes: Galileo Theory and Method. New York: Academic Press.