Bayesian Image Classification with Baddeley’s Delta Loss

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 55-73

  Frigessi, Arnoldo ^a   Rue, Håvard ^b  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Asymmetric loss functions; Bayesian inference; Distance between binary images; Image restoration; Markov chain Monte Carlo methods; Metropolis algorithm

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031537121     PISSN: 10618600     EISSN: 15372715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.1997.10474727     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baddeley, A. (1992), “Errors in Binary Images and a Lp Version of the Hausdorff Metric,” Nieuw Archief coor Wiskunde, 10, 157-183.
2. Besag, J. (1986), “On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 48, 259-302.
3. Besag, J., Green, P., Higdon, D., and Mengersen, K. (1995), “Bayesian Computation and Stochastic Systems” (with discussion), Statistical Science, 10, 3-66.
4. Borgefors, G. (1986), “Distance Transformations in Digital Images,” Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 34, 344-371.
5. Chicân, A. (ed.) (1991), Progress in Decision, Utility and Risk Theory, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Ferrari, P. A., Frigessi, A., and Gonzaga de Sâ, P. (1995), “Fast Approximate Maximum a posteriori Restoration of Multicolor Images,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 485-500.
7. Frigessi, A., Martinelli, F., and Stander, J. (in press), “Computational Complexity of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Finite Markov Random Fields,” Biometrika.
8. Geman, D. (1990), “Random Fields and Inverse Problems in Imaging,” in Ecole d’ete de probabilités de Saint-Flour XVIII, 1988, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, ed. P. L. Hennequin, New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 1427.
9. Geyer, C. (1992), “Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo” (with discussion), Statistical Science, 7, 473-511.
10. Gidas, B. (1995), “Metropolis-Type Monte Carlo Simulation Algorithms and Simulated Annealing,” in Topics in Contemporary Probability and its Applications, Probability Stochastics Series, Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
11. Greenwood, P. E., McKeague, I. W., and Wefelmeyer, W. (1996), “Outperforming the Gibbs Sampler Empirical Estimator for Nearest-Neighbor Random Fields,” The Annals of Statistics, 24, 1433-1456.
12. Greig, D. M., Porteous, B. T., and Scheult, A. H. (1989), “Exact Maximum a posteriori Estimation for Binary Images,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 51, 271-279.
13. Mengersen, K.L., and Tweedie, R. L. (1996), “Rates of Convergence of the Hastings and Metropolis Algorithms,” The Annals of Statistics, 24, 101-121.
14. Rosenfeld, A., and Kak, A. C. (1982), Digital Picture Processing (2nd ed.), New York: Academic Press.
15. Rosenthal, J. S. (1995), “Convergence Rates for Markov Chains,” SIAM Review, 37, 387-405.
16. Rue, H. (1995), “New Loss Functions in Bayesian Imaging,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 900-908.
17. Rue, H. (1995), (in press), “A Loss Function Model for the Restoration of Grey Level Images,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics.
18. Serra, I. (1982), Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, New York: Academic Press.
19. Winkler, G. (1995), Image Analysis, Random Fields and Dynamic Monte Carlo Methods, New York: SpringerVerlag.