Using the South African version of the 16PF in a multicultural context

South African Journal of Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 151-159

  Van Eeden, René ^a   Prinsloo, Casper H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

^b HUMAN SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031536746     PISSN: 00812463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/008124639702700304     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abrahams, F. (1994). The cross-cultural comparability of personality tests in South Africa: is it possible? Paper presented at the Congress on Psychometrics, Johannesburg.
2. Argentero, P. (1989). Second-order factor structure of Cattell's 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1043-1047.
3. Augustyn, J.C.D. & Van Wyk, A.J. (1988). Die sestienpersoonlik-heidsfaktorvraelys as hulpmiddel by die takseersentrum (The 16PF Personality Test as an aid to the assessment centre). Journal of Industrial Psychology, 14, 25-27.
4. Bartram, D. (1992). The personality of UK managers: 16PF norms for short-listed applicants. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 159-172.
5. Boyle, G.J. (1990). A review of the factor structure of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire and the Clinical Analysis Questionnaire. Psychological Test Bulletin, 3, 40-45.
6. Cattell, H.B. (1989). The 16PF: personality in depth. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.
7. Cattell, R.B., Eber, H.W. & Tatsuoka, M.M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.
8. Cattell, R.B. & Krug, S.E. (1986). The number of factors in the 16PF: a review of the evidence with special emphasis on methodological problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 509-522.
9. Child, D. (1970). The essentials of factor analysis. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10. Claassen, N.C.W. (1987). Manual for the General Scholastic Aptitude Tests (GSAT) Intermediate Series. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
11. Claassen, N.C.W. (1995). Cross-cultural measurement in the human sciences. Unpublished manuscript, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria.
12. Crawford, J.R., Allan, K.M., Stephen, D.W., Parker, D.M. & Besson, J.A.O. (1989). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised (WAIS-R): factor structure in a U.K. sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1209-1212.
13. Frane, J., Jennrich, R.I. & Sampson, P.F. (1979). BMDP4M. In W.J. Dixon & M.B. Brown (Eds), BMDP statistical software (pp. 656-684). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Frank, G. (1992). The response of African Americans to the Rorschach: a review of the research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 317-325.
15. Krug, S.E. & Johns, E.F. (1986). A large scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure defined by the 16PF. Psychological Reports, 59, 683-693.
16. Landman, J. (1989). Die ontwikkeling en standardisering van'n individuele intelligensieskaal vir Xhosasprekende leerlinge (The development and standardization of an individual intelligence scale for Xhosa-speaking pupils). Unpublished doctoral thesis, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education.
17. Lorr, M. & Suziedelis, A. (1985). Profile patterns in the 16PF Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 767-773.
18. Miller, M.D. & Krieshok, T.S. (1989). Sex differences in the second-order factor structure of the 16PF: a confirmatory maximum likelihood analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 73-80.
19. Owen, K. (1991). Test bias: the validity of the Junior Aptitude Tests (JAT) for various population groups in South Africa regarding constructs measured. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 112-118.
20. Owen, K. (1992). Test -item bias: methods, findings and recommendations. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
21. Powers, S. & Jones, P.B. (1984). Factorial invariance of the California Achievement Tests across race and sex. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 967-970.
22. Prinsloo, C.H. (1992a). Manual for the use of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, South African 1992 version (16PF, SA92). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
23. Prinsloo, C.H. (1992b). Manual for the use of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, Form E (16PF, Form E). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
24. Retief, A. (1992). The cross-cultural utility of the SAPQ - bias or fruitful differences? South African Journal of Psychology, 22, 202-207.
25. Reuter, E.K. (1985). Higher-order analysis of the 16PF scores: an alternative method. Psychological Reports, 57, 564-566.
26. Robinson, M. (1994). Distinguishing learning-disabled pupils with reading problems from ordinary pupils on the basis of the Junior South African Individual Scales (JSAIS). In R. van Eeden, M. Robinson & A.B. Posthuma (Eds), Studies on South African Individual Intelligence Scales (pp. 14-47). Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
27. Russell, M.T. & Karol, D.L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition administrator's manual. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.
28. Schuerger, J.M. & Allen, L.C. (1986). Second-order factor structure common to five personality questionnaires. Psychological Reports, 58, 119-126.
29. Smith, G.A., Dowling, P.J. & Barry, B. (1985). Australian managers' norms on the 16PF. Australian Psychologist, 20, 293-301.
30. Stumpf, H. (1993). The factor structure of the Personality Research Form: a cross-national evaluation. Journal of Personality, 61, 27-48.
31. Taylor, T.R. & Boeyens, J.C.A. (1991). The comparability of the scores of blacks and whites on the South African Personality Questionnaire: an exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 21, 1-11.
32. Van Eeden, R. (1991). Manual for the Senior South African Individual Scale - Revised (SSAIS-R). Part 1: background and standardization. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
33. Van Eeden, R. (1993). The validity of the Senior South African Individual Scale - Revised (SSAIS-R) for children whose mother tongue is an African language: private schools. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
34. Van Eeden, R. & Visser, D. (1992). The validity of the Senior South African Individual Scale-Revised (SSAIS-R) for different population groups. South African Journal of Psychology, 22, 163-171.
35. Wallbrown, F.H., Reuter, E.K. & Barnett, R.W. (1989). Motivational distortion on 16PF primaries by male felons. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 7-14.
36. Whitworth, R.H. & Perry, S.M. (1990). Comparison of Anglo- and Mexican-Americans on the 16PF administered in Spanish or English. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 857-863.
37. Wilson, D., Doolabh, A., Cooney, J., Khalpey, M. & Siddiqui, S. (1990). A cross-cultural validation of the Personality Research Form in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 1-12.