Dual-relationship prohibitions: A concept whose time never should have come

Applied and Preventive Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 137-156

  Ebert, Bruce W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Conflict of interest; Constitution; Dual relationship; Due process; Ethics; Multiple role relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031533236     PISSN: 09621849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0962-1849(97)80002-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Addington v. Texas, 439 U.S. 908 (1979).
2. American Psychological Association. (1953). Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Psychological Association. (1958). Ethical standards of psychologists. American Psychologist, 13, 268-271.
4. American Psychological Association. (1977). Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, DC: Author.
5. American Psychological Association. (1979). Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, DC: Author.
6. American Psychological Association. (1981). APA ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 633-638.
7. American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Standards. (1982). APA casebook for providers of psychological services. American Psychologist, 37, 698-701.
8. American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Standards. (1983). Casebook for providers of psychological services. American Psychologist, 38, 708-715.
9. American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Standards. (1984). Casebook for providers of psychological services. American Psychologist, 39, 663-669.
10. American Psychological Association. (1986). Report of the ethics committee: 1985. American Psychologist, 41, 694-698.
11. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
12. Beller v. Middendorf, (1980). 632 F.2d 788 9th Circuit.
13. Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte, 481 U.S. 535 (1987).
14. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972).
15. Borys, D. S. (1992). Nonsexual dual relationships. In L. Vandecreek, S. Knapp & Jackson, T. L. (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice; A sourcebook (Vol. 11, pp. 443-454). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.
16. U.S. v. Carolene Products, 304 U.S. 144 (1938).
17. U.S. v. L. Cohen Grocery Co., 255 U.S. 81 (1921).
18. U.S. v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612 (1954).
19. U.S. v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214 (1875).
20. Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980).
21. White v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners of Practicing Psychologists, 97 N.C. App 144, 388 S.E. Rptr. 2d 148 (1990).
22. Youngren, J. N., & Skorka, D. (1992). The non-therapeutic psychotherapy relationship. Law and Psychology Review, 16, 13-28.
23. Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad, 271 U.S. 500 (1926).
24. Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978).
25. Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 114 (1989).