Timing of the CS-US Interval by Pigeons in Trace and Delay Autoshaping

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 40-53

  Brown, Bruce L ^a   Hemmes, Nancy S ^b   De Vaca, Soledad Cabeza ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b Queens College CUNY ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031530007     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/027249997393637     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Balsam, P. (1984). Relative time in trace conditioning. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 423; Timing and time perception (pp. 211-227). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
2. Barnet, R.C., Arnold, H.M., & Miller, R.R. (1991). Simultaneous conditioning demonstrated in second-order conditioning: Evidence for similar associative structure in forward and simultaneous conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 22, 253-268.
3. Brown, B.L. (1995). Temporal control of Pavlovian conditioning. Paper presented at the Winter Conference on Animal Learning XIII, Winter Park, Colorado. January.
4. Brown, B.L., Hemmes, N.S., & Cabeza de Vaca, S. (1992). Effects of intratrial stimulus change on fixed-interval performance: The roles of clock and memory processes. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20, 83-93.
5. Brown, B.L., Hemmes, N.S., Cabeza de Vaca, S., & Pagano, C. (1993). Sign and goal tracking during delay and trace autoshaping in pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 21, 360-368.
6. Church, R.M. (1989). Theories of timing behavior. In S.B. Klein & R.R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning (pp. 41-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Cole, R.P., Barnet, R.C., & Miller, R.R. (1995). Temporal encoding in trace conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 23, 144-153.
8. Dews, P.B. (1970). The theory of fixed-interval responding. In W.N. Schoenfeld (Ed.). The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 43-61). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Ellison, G.D. (1964). Differential salivary conditioning to traces. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57, 373-380.
10. Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's Law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279-325.
11. Gibbon, J. (1991). Origins of scalar timing. Learning and Motivation, 22, 3-38.
12. Gibbon, J., & Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. In C.M. Locurto, H.S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219-254). New York: Academic Press.
13. Gibbon, J., Baldock, M.D., Locurto, C., Gold, L., & Terrace, H.S. (1977). Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 264-284.
14. Gibbon, J., Farrell, L., Locurto, C.M., Duncan, H., & Terrace, H.S. (1980). Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons. Animal Learning and Behavior, 8, 45-59.
15. Hemmes, N.S., Brown, B.L., & Cabeza de Vaca, S. (1990). Effects of trial duration on overall and momentary rates of maintained autoshaped keypecking: Choice and single-stimulus trials. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 171-178.
16. Kamin, L.J. (1965) Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. In W.F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning: A symposium (pp. 118-147). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
17. Kaplan, P.S. (1984). Importance of relative temporal parameters in trace autoshaping: From excitation to inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 113-126.
18. Kehoe, E.J., Home, P.S., Macrae, M., & Home, A. (1993). Real-time processing of serial stimuli in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrance response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 265-283.
19. Kehoe, E.J., & Napier, R.M. (1991). Real-time factors in the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to pulsed and serial conditioned stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior, 19, 195-206.
20. Kimmel, H.D. (1965). Instrumental inhibitory factors in classical conditioning. In W.F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning (pp. 148-171). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21. Lefrancois, J.R., & Lattal, K.A. (1987). The temporal relation between contingent events in positive automaintenance. The Psychological Record, 37, 387-397.
22. Levey, A.B., & Martin, I. (1968). Shape of the conditioned eyelid response. Psychological Review, 75, 398-408.
23. LoLordo, V.M., & Fairless, J.L. (1985). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition: The literature since 1969. In R.R. Miller & N.E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 1-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Lucas, G.A., Deich, J.D., & Wasserman, E.A. (1981). Trace autoshaping: Acquisition, maintenance, and path dependence at long trace intervals. The Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 61-74.
25. Matzel, L.D., Held, F.P., & Miller, R.R. (1988). Information and expression of simultaneous and backward associations: Implications for contiguity theory. Learning and Motivation, 19, 317-344.
26. Newlin, R.J., & LoLordo, V.M. (1976). A comparison of pecking generated by serial, delay, and trace autoshaping procedures. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 227-241.
27. Ohyama, T. Gibbon, J., Deich, J.D., & Balsam, P.D. (1996). Temporal control of responding in autoshaping. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia, PA. March.
28. Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (tr. G.V. Anrep). London: Oxford University Press.
29. Roberts, S., & Church, R.M. (1978). Control of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 318-337.
30. van Hest, A., van Haaren, F., Kop, P., & van der Schoot, F. (1986). Stimulus- and feeder-directed behavior in a long-box: Effect of fixed versus variable time schedules of food presentation. Animal Learning and Behavior, 14, 168-172.