Deriving the partial values in MCDM by goal programming

Annals of Operations Research

Volumn 74, Issue , 1997, Pages 277-288

  Moy, Jane W ^a   Lam, Kim Fung ^b   Choo, Eng Ung ^c  

^a HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Goal programming; Ordinary least squares regression; Preference ordering

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031527830     PISSN: 02545330     EISSN: 15729338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018930723267     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. T.L. Saaty, Multicriteria decision making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990.
2. A. Arbel, Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 43 (1989)317-326.
3. N. Bryson, A goal programming method for generating priority vectors, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46 (1995)641-648.
4. W.D. Cook and M. Kress, Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 37(1988)355-362.
5. J. Fichtner, On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons, Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 20(1986)341-345.
6. A. Hashimoto, A note on deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 73(1994)144-149.
7. P.E. Green and V. Srinivasan, Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook, J. Consumer Res. 5(1978)103-123.
8. D. Pekelman and S.K. Sen, Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights, Mgmt. Sci. 23(1974)1217-1229.
9. V. Srinivasan, Linear programming computational procedures for ordinal regression, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 23(1975)475-487.
10. E.U. Choo and W.C. Wedley, Optimal criterion weights in repetitive multicriteria decision-making, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 36(1985)983-992.
11. K.F. Lam and E.U. Choo, Goal programming in preference decomposition, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 46(1995)205-213.
12. J. Johnston, Econometrics Methods, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1972.
13. T.J. Stewart, A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice, Omega 20(1990)569-586.
14. A.A. Salo and R.P. Hamalainen, Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 82(1995)458-475.
15. P.E. Green and V. Srinivasan, Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice, J. Mktg. 54(1990)3-19.
16. N. Bryson, A. Mobolurin and O. Ngwenyama, Modelling pairwise comparison on ratio scales, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 83(1995)639-654.
17. B. Schoner, W.C. Wedley and E.U. Choo, A unified approach to AHP with linking pins, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 64(1993)384-392.
18. B. Schoner and W.C. Wedley, Ambiguous criteria weights in AHP - consequences and solutions, Decision Sciences 20(1989)462-475.
19. T.L. Saaty, Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares, Euro. J. Oper. Res. 48(1990)156-160.
20. D.R. Wittink and P. Cattin, Alternative estimation methods for conjoint analysis: A Monte Carlo study, J. Mktg. Res. 18(1981)101-106.
21. T.W. Leigh, D.B. Mackay and J.O. Summers, Reliability and validity of conjoint analysis and self-explicated weights: A comparison, J. Mktg. Res. 21(1984)456-462.
22. P.E. Green and K. Helsen, Cross-validation assessment of alternatives to individual-level conjoint analysis: A case study, J. Mktg. Res. 26(1989)346-350.
23. R. Mehta, W.L. Moore and T.M. Pavia, An examination of the use of unacceptable levels in conjoint analysis, J. Consumer Res. 19(1992)470-476.
24. P.E. Green, A.M. Krieger and C.M. Schaffer, An empirical test of optimal respondent weighting in conjoint analysis, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21(1993)345-351.
25. Conjoint Analyzer, Bretton-Clark, Morristown, NJ, 1989.