Variation of hadron masses in finite nuclei

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 2637-2648

  Saito, K ^a   Tsushima, K ^b   Thomas, A W ^b  

^a TOHOKU PHARMACEUTICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031524448     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.55.2637     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. HELIOS-3 Collaboration, M. Masera, Nucl. Phys.A590, 93c (1995)
2. CERES Collaboration, P. Wurm, Nucl. Phys.A590, 103c (1995)
3. G. Q. Li, C. M. Ko, and G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys.A606, 568 (1996)
4. G. Chanfray, R. Rapp, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 368 (1996)
5. Quark Matter ’95 [Nucl. Phys. A590 (1995)].
6. Lattice ’94 [Nucl. Phys., Proc. Suppl. B42(1995)].
7. M. Asakawa, C. M. Ko, P. Lévai, and X. J. Qiu, Phys. Rev. C46, R1159 (1992)
8. T. Hatsuda and Su H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C46, R34 (1993)
9. M. Asakawa and C. M. Ko, 48, R526 (1993)
10. T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and Su H. Lee, Nucl. Phys.B394, 221 (1993)
11. K. Saito, T. Maruyama, and K. Soutome, Phys. Rev. C40, 407 (1989)
12. K. Soutome, T. Maruyama, and K. Saito, Nucl. Phys.A507, 731 (1990)
13. H. Kurasawa and T. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Phys.84, 1030 (1990)
14. J. C. Caillon and J. Labarsouque, Phys. Lett. B311, 19 (1993)
15. H. -C. Jean, J. Piekarewicz, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. C49, 1981 (1994)
16. H. Shiomi and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Lett. B334, 281 (1994)
17. H. Kuwabara and T. Hatsuda, Prog. Theor. Phys.96, 1163 (1995)
18. T. Hatsuda, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non-Nucleonic Degrees of Freedon Detected in Nucleus, Osaka, 1996, edited by T. Minamisono and K. Matsuta (World Scientific, Singapore, in press).
19. D. K. Griegel and Thomas D. Cohen, Phys. Lett. B333, 27 (1994)
20. J. D. Walecka, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)83, 491 (1974); APNYA6
21. B. D. Serot and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Nucl. Phys.16, 1 (1986)
22. K. Saito and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C52, 2789 (1995)
23. P. A. M. Guichon, K. Saito, E. Rodionov, and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys.A601, 349 (1996)
24. P. A. M. Guichon, K. Saito, and A. W. Thomas, Aust. J. Phys.50, 115 (1996)
25. P. A. M. Guichon, Phys. Lett. B200, 235 (1988)
26. K. Saito, A. Michels, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C46, R2149 (1992)
27. A. W. Thomas, K. Saito, and A. Michels, Aust. J. Phys.46, 3 (1993)
28. K. Saito and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys.A574, 659 (1994)
29. Phys. Lett. B335, 17 (1994)
30. 363, 157 (1995).
31. K. Saito and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Lett. B327, 9 (1994)
32. K. Saito and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C51, 2757 (1995)
33. K. Saito, K. Tsushima, and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys.A609, 339 (1996)
34. P. G. Blunden and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C54, 359 (1996)
35. X. Jin and B. K. Jennings, Phys. Lett. B374, 13 (1996)
36. Phys. Rev. C54, 1427 (1996)
37. 55, 1567 (1997).
38. In our earlier works, the phenomenological center-of-mass correction to the bag energy was used. In this paper, however, we do not use it because the c.m. and gluon fluctuation corrections may be absorbed into the familiar form, (Formula presented) See Ref. 16.
39. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep.247, 221 (1994)
40. V. Bernard and Ulf-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys.A489, 647 (1988)
41. A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and C. B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D10, 2599 (1974)
42. R. Machleidt and R. Brockmann, Phys. Lett.160B, 364 (1985); PYLBAJReport No. nucl-th/9612004 (unpublished).
43. K. Tsushima, K. Saito, and A.W. Thomas, Adelaide UniversityReport No. ADP-97-5/T244, Phys. Lett. B (to be published).
44. C. J. Horowitz and B. D. Serot, Nucl. Phys.A368, 503 (1981)
45. C. J. Horowitz, D. P. Murdoch, and B. D. Serot, in Computational Nuclear Physics 1, edited by K. Langanke, J. A. Maruhn, and S. E. Koonin (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991), p. 129.
46. B. B. P. Sinha et al., Phys. Lett.53B, 217 (1971)
47. The numerical calculation was carried out by modifying the technique described by Horowitz et al. 30. It was performed with a maximum radius of 12 (15) fm on a mesh of 0.04 fm for medium mass (Pb) nuclei. Since the numerical convergence is slow, we have improved the program by mixing appropriately the meson potentials given by the (Formula presented)th iteration and those by the (Formula presented)th iteration—as is usually done in nonrelativistic calculations. For the QMC-II model, it is needed to calculate several 10 iterations for middle nuclei while about 100 iterations for Pb. We find that it becomes harder to find a good initial condition for the meson fields in the case where the nuclear compressibility is smaller, for example, in the parameter set A rather than in C. Probably a more powerful technique is required to make the convergence of the calculation rapid.
48. D. R. Phillips, M. C. Birse, and S. J. Wallace, Report No. (unpublished).
49. R. J. Furnstahl, B. D. Serot, and H. -B. Tang, Nucl. Phys.A598, 539 (1996)
50. H. Müller and B. D. Serot, A606, 508 (1996).
51. P. G. Reinhard, Rep. Prog. Phys.52, 439 (1989)
52. G. A. Lalazissis, M. M. Sharma, P. Ring, and Y. K. Gambhir, Nucl. Phys.A608, 202 (1996)
53. S. J. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 2916 (1986)
54. P. G. Reinhard et al., Z. Phys. A323, 13 (1986)
55. M. M. Sharma, M. A. Nagarajan, and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B312, 377 (1993)
56. T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, Phys. Rev. D9, 2291 (1974)
57. A. W. Thomas, Adv. Nucl. Phys.13, 1 (1984)
58. G. A. Miller, Int. Rev. Nucl. Phys. 2, 190 (1984). IRNPEH