Distractor selection ratios

Psychometrika

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 51-62

  Love, Thomas E ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Association; Contingency tables; Individual choice behavior; Item response theory; Latent variable models; Multiple choice items

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031523148     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02294780     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Birch, M. W. (1964). The detection of partial association, I: The 2×2 case. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26, 313-324.
2. Birch, M. W. (1965). The detection of partial association, II: The general case. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 27, 111-124.
3. Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
4. Fienberg, S. E. (1979). Log linear representation for paired comparison models with ties and within-pair order effects. Biometrics, 35, 479-481.
5. Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Fienberg, S. E., & Larntz, K. (1976). Loglinear representation for paired and multiple comparisons models. Biometrika, 63, 245-254.
7. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1979). Measures of association for cross classifications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Holland, P. W. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data? Psychometrika, 46, 79-92.
9. Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1523-1543.
10. Junker, B. W. (1991). Essential independence and likelihood-based ability estimation for polytomous items. Psychometrika, 56, 255-278.
11. Levine, M. V., & Drasgow, F. (1983). The relation between incorrect option choice and estimated proficiency. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 675-685.
12. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
13. Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 690-700.
14. Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the retrospective study of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719-748.
15. Mislevy, R. J., & Verhelst, N. (1990). Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solutions strategies. Psychometrika, 55, 195-216.
16. Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory. Psychometrika, 49, 425-435.
17. Rosenbaum, P. R. (1987). Comparing item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 52, 217-233.
18. Samejima, F. (1979). A new family of models for the multiple choice item (Research Report No. 79-4). Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.
19. Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1984). A response model for multiple choice items. Psychometrika, 49, 501-519.