Examining the Relationship of the Role Category Questionnaire to Measures of Intelligence

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 129-138

  Allen, Mike ^a   Mabry, Edward A ^a   Preiss, Raymond G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031522340     PISSN: 08861641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allen, M., Mabry, E., Banski, M., Carter, P., & Stoneman, M. (1990). A thoughtful appraisal of measuring cognition using the Role Category Questionnaire. Communication Reports, 3, 49-57.
2. Allen, M., Mabry, E., Banski, M., & Preiss, R. (1991). Continuing the Dialog on the RCQ. Communication Reports, 4, 120-125.
3. Beatty, M, & Payne, S. (1984). Loquacity and quantity of constructs as predictors of social perspective taking. Communication Quarterly, 32, 207-210.
4. Burleson, B., & Waltman, M. (1988). Cognitive complexity: Using the Role Category Questionnaire. In C. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communication processes (pp. 1-37). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Crockett, W. (1965). Cognitive complexity and impression formation. In B. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 2, pp. 47-50). New York: Academic Press.
6. Delia, J.G. (1974). Cognitive complexity and impression formation in informal social interaction. Speech Monographs, 41, 299-308.
7. Delia, J.G. (1977). Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63, 66-83.
8. Farrar, D., & Glauber, R. (1967). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: The problem revisited. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 92-107.
9. Goyer, R.S. (1967). A test to measure the ability to organize ideas. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 63-64.
10. Goyer, R.S. (1979, July). A test to measure the ability to organize ideas (Special Report No. 9 [revised]). Athens, Ohio: Ohio University, Center for Communication Studies.
11. Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. (1991). Cognitive editing of arguments and interpersonal construct differentiation: Refining the relationship. In F. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. Anthony, & C. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation (pp. 567-574) Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SICSAT.
12. Hunter, J. (1980). Factor analysis. In P. Monge and J. Cappella (Eds.), Multivariate techniques in human communication research (pp. 229-258). New York: Academic Press.
13. Kelley, G. (1963). A theory of personality. New York: W. W. Norton.
14. Levine, T., & McCroskey, J. (1990). Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA-24. Communication Monographs, 57, 62-72.
15. Miller, A., & Wilson, P. (1979). Cognitive differentiation and integration: A conceptual analysis. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 99, 3-40.
16. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Pub.
17. Powers, W., Jordan, W., & Street, R. (1979). Language indices in the measurement of cognitive complexity: Is complexity loquacity? Human Communication Research, 6, 69-73.
18. Staats, A.W. (1968). Learning, language, and cognition. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
19. Sypher, H.E., & Applegate, J.L. (1982). Cognitive differentiation and verbal intelligence: Clarifying relationships. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 537-543.