Systemic approaches to articulating and monitoring student outcomes: Are they consistent with outcome-based education?

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 5-30

  Willis, Sue ^a   Kissane, Barry ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031521293     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(97)00002-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adler, J. (1991). Vision and constraint: Politics and mathematics national curricula in a changing South Africa. In D. Pimm & E. Love (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics. Hodder & Stoughton/Open University, London.
2. Allen, D., & McDonald, J. (1993). Keeping student performance central: The New York Assessment Collection. Studies on Exhibitions No 14, Coalition of Essential Schools, Brown University.
3. Blackburn, J. (1991). Public schooling: The democratic commitment', Education Quarterly, 1, 11-16.
4. Brandt, R. (1992/1993). On outcome-based education: A conversation with Bill Spady. Educational Leadership, 50 (4), 66-70.
5. Brown, M. (1991). Problematic issues in national assessment. Cambridge Journal of Education, 21 (2), 215-229.
6. Clark, J. (1994). Teachers using videotapes as reference points to assess their students. In D. Robitaille, D. Wheeler & C. Kieran, Selected Lectures from the 7th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Sainte-Foy, Québec: Les Presses de L'Université Laval.
7. Curriculum Corporation (1994a). CURASS Guideline Paper. A joint project of the States, Territories and the Commonwealth of Australia initiated by the Australian Education Council, Carlton.
8. Curriculum Corporation (1994b). Mathematics - A Curriculum Profile for Australian Schools. A joint project of the States, Territories and the Commonwealth of Australia initiated by the Australian Education Council, Carlton.
9. Cushman, K. (1993). How the National Standards debate affects the essential school. Horace, 10 (2), 1-11.
10. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994a). National standards and assessments: Will they improve? American Journal of Education, 102, 478-510.
11. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994b). Performance based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64 (1), 5-30.
12. Foster, J.D. (1991). The role of accountability in Kentucky's Educational Reform Act of 1990. Educational Leadership, 48 (5), 34-36.
13. Goulder, J., Simpson, M., & Tuson, J. (1994). The 5-14 Development Programme in Scottish secondary Schools: The first phase. The Curriculum Journal, 5 (1), 69-81.
14. Grundy, S. (1994). Reconstructing the curriculum of Australian schools: Cross curricular issues and practice. Occasional Paper, Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Canberra.
15. Harlen, W., & Malcolm, H. (1994). Putting the curriculum and assessment guidelines in place in Scottish primary schools', The Curriculum Journal, 5(1), 55-67.
16. Helsby, G., & Saunders, M. (1993). Taylorism, Tylerism and performance indicators: Defending the indefensible? Educational Studies, 19 (1), 55-77.
17. Issacson, Z., & Coombe, J. (1991). National curricula: Paradoxes and dilemmas. In D. Pimm & E. Love (Ed.), Teaching and learning school mathematics. Hodder & Stoughton in association with the Open University, London.
18. Latter, S., & Donnelly, J. (1993). Toronto's Benchmark Program. Educational Leadership, 50 (5), 59-62.
19. Madaus, G., & Kellaghan, T. (1993). The British experience with authentic assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (6), 458-469.
20. McLean, K. (1995). Anything I liked, really. Education Quarterly Australia, 1, 40-42.
21. Malcolm, C. (1995). Teaching and learning: An open or closed book? Education Quarterly Australia, 2, 34-36.
22. McDonald, J. P. (1993) Three pictures of an exhibition: warm, cool and hard, Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (6), 480-485.
23. Ministry of Education (1993a). The Common Curriculum Grades 1-9, Ministry of Education and Training, Ontario, Canada.
24. Ministry of Education (1993b). Provincial standards: Mathematics, Ministry of Education and Training, Ontario, Canada.
25. National Curriculum Council (1992). Starting out with the National Curriculum: An introduction to the National Curriculum and Religious Education, National Curriculum Council, York.
26. New York State Curriculum and Assessment Council (1992). Building a learner-centred curriculum for learner-centred schools, Interim Report of the New York State Curriculum and Assessment Council to the Commissioner and the Regents, October 1992.
27. O'Neil, J. (1993a). Can national standards make a difference? Educational Leadership, 50 (5), 4-8.
28. O'Neil, J. (1993b). On the new standards project: A conversation with Lauren Resnick and Warren Simmons, Educational Leadership, 50 (5), 17-21.
29. Porter, A.C. (1993). School delivery standards', Educational Researcher, 22 (5), 24-30.
30. Porter, A. C. (1994). National standards and school improvement in the 1990s: Issues and promise. American Journal of Education, 102, 421-449.
31. Preston, B. (1993). Teacher professionalism: Implications for teachers, teacher educators and democratic schooling. Independent Education, 23 (4), 4-12.
32. Rutledge, D. (1993, June/July). Toronto's benchmark program: Who's in charge here? Curriculum in Profile Conference: Quality or Inequality, Queensland University of Technology, Australian Curriculum Association.
33. Scottish Examination Board (1993a). Assessment 5-14: A Teachers' Guide to National Testing in Secondary School. Midlothian, Scotland: Scottish Examination Board.
34. Scottish Examination Board, 5-14 Assessment Unit (1993b). Preface, National Test Units Catalogue for 1993/4, Midlothian, Scotland: Scottish Examination Board.
35. Shepard, L., & Smith, M. (1990). Synthesis of research on grade retention. Educational Leadership, 47 (8), 84-88.
36. Simmons, W., & Resnick, L. (1993). Assessment as the catalyst of school reform. Educational Leadership, 50 (5), 11-15.
37. Steffy, B.E. (1993). Top-down - bottom-up: Systemic change in Kentucky. Educational Leadership, 51 (1), 42-44.
38. Wiggins, G. (1994). Toward better report cards. Educational Leadership, 52 (2), 28-37.
39. Willis, S. (1994). Student outcome statements: What's it all about? Cross Section, 6 (1), 2-7.
40. Willis, S. (1996). Professional judgement and the Mathematics Profile, Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 1 (1), 11-15.