Realism in eyewitness confidence as a function of type of event witnessed and repeated recall

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 599-613

  Granhag, Pär Anders ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031519799     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.599     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allwood, C. M., & Björhag, C. G. (1991). Mood and the realism of confidence judgements of one's own answer to general knowledge questions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 32, 358-371.
2. Allwood, C. M., & Granhag, P. A. (1996). Considering the knowledge you have: Effects on realism in confidence judgments. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 235-256.
3. Allwood, C. M., & Montgomery, H. (1987). Response selection strategies and realism of confidence judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 365-383.
4. Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
5. Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364-370.
6. Clifford, B. R., & Scott, J. (1978). Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 352-359.
7. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Moderators of the confidence-accuracy correlation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base-rates. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 95-107.
8. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.
10. Deffenbacher, K. A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence - Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.
11. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1992). Examining the generality of eyewitness hypermnesia: A close look at time delay and question type. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 643-657.
12. Gigerenzer, G. (1994). Why the distinction between single-event probabilities and frequencies is important for psychology (and vice versa). In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 129-161). New York: Wiley.
13. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506-528.
14. Gorenstein, G. W., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 616-622.
15. Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411-435.
16. Hastie, R., Landsman, R., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Eyewitness testimony: The dangers of guessing. Jurimetrics Journal, 19, 1-8.
17. Kassin, S. M. (1985). Eyewitness identification: Retrospective self-awareness and the accuracy-confidence correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 878-893.
18. Keren, G. (1991). Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica, 77, 217-273.
19. Leippe, M. R. (1980). Effects on integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondance of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 261-274.
20. Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art of 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgements under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-334). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., & Rumpel, C. M. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and across situations? Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79-89.
22. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Loftus, E. F., & Doyle, J. M. (1987). Eyewitness testimony: Civil and criminal. New York: Kluwer Law Book.
24. Loftus, E. F., & Ketcham, K. (1991). Witness for the defense: The accused, the eyewitness, and the expert who puts memory on trial. New York: St. Martin's Press.
25. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1994a). Eyewitness identification confidence. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 348-361). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1994b). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714-723.
27. McClelland, A. G. R., & Bolger, F. (1994). The calibration of subjective probabilities: Theories and models 1980-94. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 453-482). New York: Wiley.
28. Nelson, T.O. (1992). Metacognition: Core readings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Ryan, R. H., & Geiselman, R. E. (1991). Effects of biased information on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 7-9.
30. Sporer, S. L. (1996). Person descriptions in criminal investigations. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 53-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
32. Turtle, J. W., & Yuille, J. C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260-271.
33. Wagenaar, W. A., van Koppen, P. J., & Crombag, H. F. M. (1993). Anchored narratives: The psychology of criminal evidence. New York: St. Martin's Press.
34. Weingardt, K. R., Leonesio, R. J., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Viewing eyewitness research from a metacognitive perspective. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 157-184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Wells, G. L., Ferguson, T. J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 688-696.
36. Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.
37. Wells, L. W., & Murray, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In L. W. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychology perspectives (pp. 155-170). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.