Theories of spontaneous disorder

Review of International Political Economy

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 319-348

  Inayatullah, Naeem ^a  

^a ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Knowledgeability; Neorealism; Reflexivity; Scottish Enlightenment; Structural realism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031519584     PISSN: 09692290     EISSN: 14664526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/096922997347805     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agnew, J. (1994) ‘The territorial trap’, Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53-80.
2. Agnew, J. and Corbridge, S. (1995) Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy, London: Routledge.
3. Ashley, R. (1983) ‘Three modes of economism’, International Studies Quarterly 27 (4): 463-96.
4. Ashley, R. (1984) ‘The poverty of neorealism’, International Organization 38 (2): 225-86.
5. Baldwin, D. (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Barry, N. (1982) ‘The tradition of spontaneous order”, Literature of Liberty 5: 7-54.
7. Blaney, D. and Inayatullah, N. (1997) ‘Ethical diversity and global economic justice’, Global Justice 4 (3).
8. Boudon, R. (1982) [1977] The Unintended Consequences of Social Action, New York: St Martin’s Press.
9. Brown, C. (1992) International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches, New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society, New York: Columbia University Press.
11. Buzan, B., Jones, C. and Little, R. (1993) The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Collingwood, R. G. (1956) [1946] The Idea of History, London: Oxford University Press.
13. Cox, R. (1986) ‘Social forces, states, and world orders’, in Robert Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Dessler, D. (1989) ‘What is at stake in the agent-structure debate?’, International Organization 43 (3): 441-73.
15. Dumont, L. (1977) From Mandeville to Marx, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Ferguson, A. (1966) [1767] An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
17. Forbes, D. (1954) ‘Scientific Whiggism: Adam Smith and John Millar’, Cambridge Journal 7: 643-70.
18. Gerth, H. and Mills, C. (1946) From Max Weber, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Giddens, A. (1976) New Rules of Sociological Method, New York: Basic Books.
20. Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Gilpin, R. (1975) U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation, New York: Basic Books.
23. Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Gilpin, R. (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Hamowy, R. (1987) The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of Spontaneous Order, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
26. Hayek, F. (1945) ‘The uses of knowledge in society’, American Economic Review 35: 77-91.
27. Hayek, F. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Hayek, F. (1967a) ‘’The results of human action but not of human design’, in F. A. Hayek, Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Hayek, F. (1967b) Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Hegel, G. W. F. (1967) [1821] Philosophy of Right, trans. T. M. Knox, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Hirschman, A. O. (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Hoffmann, S. (1965) ‘Minerva and Janus’, in The State of War, New York: Praeger.
33. Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Inayatullah, N. (1993) ‘Old readings and new approaches: International relations theory and Adam Smith’, unpublished paper, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
35. Inayatullah, N. (1996) ‘Quasi-state as social construct’, in T. Biersteker and C. Weber, State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Inayatullah, N. and Blaney, D. (1995) ‘Realizing sovereignty’, Review of International Studies 21 (1): 3-20.
37. Inayatullah, N. and Blaney, D. (1996) ‘Knowing encounters: Beyond parochialism in international relations theory’, in Y. Lapid and F. Kratochwil (eds) The Return of Culture and Identity, Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
38. Inayatullah N. and Rupert, M. (1994) ‘Hobbes, Smith, and the problem of mixed ontology in neorealist international political economy’, in S. Rosow, N. Inayatullah and M. Rupert (eds) The Global Economy as Political Space, Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
39. Levine, D. P. (1977) Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
40. Linklater, A. (1992) ‘The question of the next stage in international relations theory: A critical-theoretical point of view’, Millennium 21 (1): 77-98.
41. MacLean, J. (1984) ‘Interdependence - an ideological intervention in international relations?’, in R. B. J. Jones and P. Willetts (eds) Interdependence on Trial: Studies in the Theory and Reality of Contemporary Interdependence, London: Frances Pinter.
42. MacLean, J. (1988) ‘Belief systems and ideology in international relations: A critical approach’, in Richard Little and Steve Smith, Belief Systems in International Relations, London: Blackwell.
43. Marx, K. (1973) [1857] Grundrisse, New York: Vintage.
44. Marx, K. (1977) [1867] Capital, vol. I, New York: Vintage.
45. Meek, R. (1967) ‘The Scottish contribution to Marxist sociology’, in R. Meek, Economics and Ideology and Other Essays: Studies in the Development of Economic Thought, London: Chapman & Hall.
46. Marx, R. (1971) ‘Smith, Turgot, and the “four-stages” theory’, History of Political Economy 3: 9-27. Reprinted (1977) in R. Meek, Smith, Marx, and After: Ten Essays in the Development of Economic Thought, London: Chapman & Hall.
47. Marx, R. (1976) Social Science and the Ignoble Savage, New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Merton, R. K. (1936) ‘The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action’, American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894-904.
49. Morgenthau, H. (1985) Politics Among Nations, New York: Knopf.
50. Pascal, R. (1938) ‘Property and society: The Scottish historical school’, Modern Quarterly 1: 167-79.
51. Ranadive, K. N. (1983) ‘The Wealth of Nations - the vision and the conceptualization’, in J. C. Wood (ed.) Adam Smith: Critical Assessments, Vol. II, London: Croom Helm.
52. Rengger, N. and Hoffman, M. (1992) ‘Modernity, postmodernism, and international relations’, in J. Doherty, E. Graham and M. Malek (eds) Postmodernism and the Social Sciences, New York: St Martin’s Press.
53. Rousseau, J. J. (1983) [1754] ‘Discourse on the origin of inequality’, in J. J. Rousseau, On the Social Contract and Discourses, trans. by D. A. Cress, Indianapolis, Ind.: Hacket.
54. Sahlins, M. (1972) ‘The original affluent society’, in M. Sahlins, Stone Age Economics, Chicago: Adeline Press.
55. Said, E. (1979) Orientalism, New York: Vintage.
56. Smith, A. (1976) [1776] An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. E. Cannan, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Smith, A. (1978) Lectures in Jurisprudence, eds R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael and P. G. Stein, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58. Smith, S. (1992) ‘The forty years’ detour: The resurgence of normative theory in international relations’, Millennium 21 (3): 489-506.
59. Smith, S. (1995) ‘The self-images of a discipline: A genealogy of international relations theory’, in K. Booth and S. Smith (eds) International Relations Theory Today, University Park, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press.
60. Tooze, R. (1988) ‘Economic belief systems and understanding international relations’, in Richard Little and Steve Smith (eds) Belief Systems in International Relations, London: Blackwell.
61. Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1978) ‘Invisible-hand explanations’, Synthese 39: 263-91.
62. Vernon, R. (1971) Sovereignty at Bay, New York: Basic Books.
63. Viner, J. (1991) ‘Adam Smith and laissez faire’, in Essays on the Intellectual History of Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64. Walker, R. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Waltz, K. (1959) Man, the State and War, New York: Columbia University Press.
66. Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics, Boston, Mass.: Addison Wesley.
67. Walzer, M. (1994) Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, South Bend, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.
68. Wendt, A. (1987) ‘The agent-structure problem in international relations theory’, International Organization 41 (3): 335-70.
69. Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics’, International Organization 46 (2) 391-425.