The validity of task coverage ratings by incumbents and supervisors: Bad news

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 85-95

  Wilson, Mark A ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031511834     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025066301244     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arvey, R. D., Davis, G. A., McGowen, S. L., Dipboye, R. L. (1982). Potential sources of bias in job analytic processes. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 618-629.
2. Arvey, R. D., Passino, E. M., & Lounsbury, J. W. (1977). Job analysis results as influenced by sex of incumbent and sex of analyst. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 411-416.
3. Carpenter, J. B., Giorgia, M. J., & McFarland, B. P. (1975). Comparative analysis of the relative validity for subjective time rating scales (AFHRL No. TR-75-63). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resource Laboratory (NTIS No. AD-A017-842/6).
4. Conley, P. R., & Sackett, P. R. (1987). Effects of using high- versus low-performing job incumbents as sources of job-analysis information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 434-437.
5. Control Data Corporation (1978). Position Description Questionnaire, Form C. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Control Data Corporation.
6. Cragun, J. R., & McCormick, E. J. (1967). Job inventory information: Task and scale reliabilities and scale interrelationships (PRL No. TR-67-15). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Personnel Research Laboratory (NTIS No. AD-681-509).
7. Gael, S. (1983). Job Analysis. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
8. Gambardella, J. J. N., & Alvord, W. G. (1980). TI-CODAP: A Computerized Method of Job Analysis for Personnel Management. Prince George's County, Maryland: Prince George's County.
9. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Page, R. C., & Tornow, W. W. (1979). Development and implementation of a computerized job evaluation system. Personnel Administrator, 24, 46-52.
10. Green, S. B., & Stutzman, T. (1986). An evaluation of methods to select respondents to structured job-analysis questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 39, 543-564.
11. Hazel, J. T., Madden, J. M., & Christal, R. E. (1964). Agreement between worker-supervisor descriptions of the worker's job. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2, 71-79.
12. McCormick, E. J. (1979). Job Analysis. New York: AMACOM.
13. McCormick, E. J., & Tombrink, K. B. A. (1960). A comparison of three types of work activity statements in terms of the consistency of job information reported by incumbents (WADD No. TR-60-80). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Personnel Laboratory (NTIS No. AD-248-386).
14. Meyer, H. H. (1959). A comparison of foreman and general foreman conceptions of the foreman's job responsibilities. Personnel Psychology, 12, 445-452.
15. Moore, B. E. (1976). Occupational analysis for human resource development: A review of utility of the task inventory (OCMM No. RR-25). Office of Civilian Manpower Management, Washington, D. C.: Navy Department (NTIS No. AD-A026-707/0).
16. Morsh, J. E., Madden, J. M., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Job analysis in the United States Air Force (WADD No. TR-61-113). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Personnel Laboratory.
17. O'Reilly, C. A., Parlette, G. N., & Bloom, J. R. (1980). Perceptual measures of task characteristics: Biasing effects of differing frames of reference and job attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 118-131.
18. Stutzman, T. M. (1983). Within classification job differences. Personnel Psychology, 36, 503-516.
19. Wexley, K. N., & Silverman S. B. (1978). An examination of differences between managerial effectiveness and response patterns on a structured job analysis questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 646-649.
20. Wilson, M. A., Harvey, R. J., & Macy, B. A. (1990). Repeating items to estimate the test-retest reliability of task inventory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 158-163.