The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families: A conceptual model

Infants and Young Children

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 23-35

  Dunn, Winnie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Habilitation; Modulation; Neuroscience; Performance; Regulatory disorders; Sensation; Thresholds sensitivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031510769     PISSN: 08963746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001163-199704000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Sears C. Recognizing and coping with tactile defensiveness in young children. Inf Young Children. 1994;6(4):46-53.
2. National Center for Clinical Infant Programs. Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood. Arlington, VA: Zero to Three; 199-4.
3. Baranek G, Berkson G. Tactile defensiveness in children with developmental disabilities: responsiveness and habituation. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994;24(4):457-451.
4. Dunn W. Performance of typical children on the sensory profile: an item analysis. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48(11):967-974.
5. Wilbarger P. The sensory diet: activity programs based on sensory processing theory. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Newsletter. 1995;18(2):1-3.
6. Ayres AJ. Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1989.
7. Coster W, Haley S. Conceptualization and measurement of disablement in infants and young children. Inf Young Children. 1992;4(4):11-22.
8. Held R, Hein A. Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1963;56:872-876.
9. Sanes JN, Mauritz KH, Dalakas MC, Evarts EV. Motor control in humans with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4:101-114.
10. Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 1993.
11. Kupfermann I. Learning and memory. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T, eds. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 1993:997-1,008.
12. Kandel E. Cellular mechanisms of learning and the biological basis of individuality. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T, eds. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier; 1993:1,009-1,031.
13. Clarke AM, Clarke ADB. Early Experience: Myth and Evidence. New York: The Free Press; 1976.
14. Dunn W. Motivation. In: Royeen C, ed. Neuroscience Foundations of Human Performance. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1991.
15. Nuttall EV, Romero I, Kalesnik J. Assessing and Screening Preschoolers: Psychological and Educational Dimensions. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1992.
16. Stellar J, Stellar E. The Neurobiology of Motivation and Reward. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985.
17. Dunn W, Brown C, McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of context. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48:595-607.
18. Brody N. Human Motivation. New York: Academic Press; 1983.
19. Ayres AJ. Sensory Integration and the Child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1980.
20. Royeen C, Fortune J. Touch inventory for elementary school aged children. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;44:155-159.
21. Larson J. The sensory history of developmentally delayed children with and without tactile defensiveness. Am J Occup Ther. 1982;36:590-596.
22. DeGangi G, Berk R. DeGangi-Berk Test of Sensory Integration (TSI). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1983.
23. Dunn W. Performance of typical children on the sensory profile: an item analysis. Am J Occup Tber. 1994;48:967-974.
24. Dunn W, Westman K. The sensory profile: the performance of a national sample of children without disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51(1):25-34.
25. Dunn W, Brown C. Factor analysis on the sensory profile from a national sample of children without disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. In press.
26. Kientz M, Dunn W. A comparison of children with autism and typical children using the sensory profile. Am J Occup Ther. In press.
27. Bennett D, Dunn W. Performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on the sensory profile. Am J Occup Ther. Submitted for publication.
28. Ermer J, Dunn W. Discriminant analysis on the sensory profile: discriminating children without disabilities, children with autism and children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Occup Ther. Submitted for publication.
29. Dunn W. The sensory profile: a discriminating measure of sensory processing in daily life. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Newsletter. In press.
30. Dunn W. The sensorimotor systems: a framework for assessment and intervention. In: Orelove F, Sobsey D, eds. Educating Children with Multiple Disabilities: A Transdisciplinary Approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 1991.
31. Dunn W, DeGangi G. Sensory integration and neurodevelopmental treatment for educational programming. In: Royeen C, ed. Classroom Applications for School-based Practice. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1993.
32. Dunn W. Sensory performance components. In: Christiansen C, Baum C, eds. Human Performance Deficits: Assessment and Intervention in Occupational Therapy. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 1991.
33. Ayres AJ. Patterns of perceptual motor dysfunction in children: a factor analytic study. Percept Mot Skills. 1965;20:335-368.
34. Ayres AJ, Mailloux Z, Wendler C. Developmental dyspraxia: is it a unitary function? Occup Ther J Res. 1987;7:93-110.
35. Ayres AJ. Southern California Kinesthesia and Tactile Perception Tests Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1966.
36. Ayres AJ. Interrelation among perceptual motor abilities in a group of normal children. Am J Occup Ther. 1966;22:289-292.