Tests of a translational model of stroop interference: Translation or attention?

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 10-19

  Walley, Roc E ^a   McLeod, Barbara E ^a,b   Khan, Myrna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b RED DEER COLLEGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031510198     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1196-1961.51.1.10     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
2. Corbetta, M., Miezen, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2383-2402.
3. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. In W. M. Cowan, E. M. Shooter, C. F. Stevens & R. F. Thompson (Eds.), Annual Review of Neuroscience (pp. 193-222). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
4. Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106-120.
5. Glaser, W. R., & Dungelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
6. Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894.
7. Harvey, N. (1984). The Stroop effect: Failure to focus attention or failure to maintain focussing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36, 89-115.
8. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
9. MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 126-135.
10. Melara, R. D., & Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory and Cognition, 21, 627-645.
11. Palef, S. R., & Olson, D. R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 201-209.
12. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
13. Virzi, R. A., & Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translation model of Stroop interference. Memory and Cognition, 13, 304-319.
14. Walley, R. E., McLeod, B. E., & Weiden, T. D. (1994). Increased attention to the irrelevant dimension increases interference in a spatial Stroop task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 467-492.