The discriminant value of information that individualizes an object and indicates its category membership;La valeur discriminante de l'information qui individualise un objet et la connaissance de ses catégories d'appartenance

Annee Psychologique

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 237-265

  Drozda Senkowska, Ewa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

Author keywords

Base rate; Individuating information; Knowledge of the object; Rationality

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031510072     PISSN: 00035033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3406/psy.1997.28951     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ajzen I. - (1977) Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base rate information on prediction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 303-314.
2. Argote L., Seabrigth M. A., Dyer L. - (1986) Individual vs groupe use of base rate and individuating information, Organizational Behavior and Human Processes, 38, 65-75.
3. Borgida E., Nisbett R. E. - (1977) The differential impact of abstract vs concrete information on decisions, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258-271.
4. Butera F., Mugny G. - (1992) Influence minoritaire et falsification, Revue Internationale de Psychologie sociale, 2, 115-132.
5. Carroll J. S., Siegler R. S. - (1977) Strategies for the use of base-rate information, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19, 392-402.
6. Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. - (1985) Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference, Psychological Review, 92, 433-461.
7. Fabre J.-M. (1993) Contexte et jugement. De la psychophysique à la responsabilité, Lille, Presses Universitaires de Lille.
8. Fischhoff B., Bar-Hillel M. - (1984) Diagnosticity and the base-rate effect, Memory and Cognition, 12, 402-410.
9. Gergen K. J., Gergen M. M. - (1984) Psychologie Sociale, Montréal, Éd. Études Vivantes.
10. Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S. - (1992) Ambiguity and human versus technological sources of information in judgments involving base rate and individuating information, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 973-997.
11. Kahneman D., Tversky A. - (1973) On the psychology of prediction, Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
12. Kahneman, D. - (1981) Who shall be the arbiter of our intuitions?, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 339-340.
13. Kruglanski A. W., Ajzen I. - (1983) Bias and error in human judgment, European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 1-44.
14. Nisbett R. E., Borgida E., Crandall R., Reed H. - (1976) Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative, in J. S. Caroll et J. W. Payne (Édit.), Cognition and social behavior, Hillsdale (NJ), Lawrence Erlbaum, 113-134.
15. Schwarz N., Strack F., Hilton D., Naderer G. - (1991) Base rate, representativeness, and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of «irrelevant» information, Social Cognition, 9, 67-94.
16. Tversky A. - (1981) L. J. Cohen, again: On the evaluation of inductive intuitions, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 354-356.
17. Tversky A., Kahneman D. - (1982) Evidential impact of base-rates, in D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (Édit.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge, Cambridge Univeristy Press, 201-208.
18. Zukier H., Pepitone A. - (1984) Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determinants in the use of base-rate information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 349-360.