Synonymy, redundancy, and the name of the crocodile stem-group

Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 448-449

  Brochu, Christopher A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031508931     PISSN: 02724634     EISSN: 19372809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.1997.10010992     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Benton, M. J. 1984. Classification and phylogeny of the diapsid reptiles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 302:605-720
2. Benton, M. J. and J. M. Clark. 1988. Archosaur phylogeny and the relationships of the Crocodylia; pp. 295-338 in M. J. Benton (ed.). The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford
3. Bryant, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades. Systematic Biology 43:124-130
4. Bryant, H. N. 1996. Explicitness, stability, and universality in the phylogenetic definition and usage of taxon names: a case study of the phylogenetic taxonomy o the Carnivora (Mammalia). Systematic Biology 45:174-189
5. de Quieroz, K. 1994. Replacement of an essentialistic perspective on taxonomic definitions as exemplified by the definition of “Mammalia.” Systematic Biology 43:497-510
6. de Quieroz, K. and J. A. Gauthier. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Systematic Zoology 39:307-322
7. de Quieroz, K. and J. A. Gauthier 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:449-480
8. de Quieroz, K. and J. A. Gauthier 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:27-31
9. Gauthier, J. A. 1986. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 8:1-55
10. Gauthier, J. A. and K. Padian. 1985. Phylogenetic, functional, and aerodynamic analyses of the origin of birds and their flight; pp. 185-197 in M. K. Hecht, J. H. Ostrom, G. Viohl, and P. Wellnhofer (eds.). The Beginnings of Birds, Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstatt
11. Gower, D. J., and M. Wilkinson. 1996. Is there any consensus on basal archosaur phylogeny? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263:1399-1406
12. Holtz, T. R. 1996. Phylogenetic taxonomy of the Coelurosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Paleontology 70:536-538
13. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1985. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (3rd Ed.). International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 338 pp
14. Juul, L. 1994. The phylogeny of basal archosaurs. Palaeontographica Africana 31:1-38
15. Padian, K. and C. L. May. 1993. The earliest dinosaurs; pp. 379-380 in S. G. Lucas and M. Morales (ed.), The Nonmarine Triassic. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 3
16. Parrish, J. M. 1993. Phylogeny of the Crocodylotarsi, with reference to archosaurian and crurotarsan monophyly. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13:287-308
17. Rowe, T. 1986. Definition and diagnosis in the phylogenetic system. Systematic Zoology 36:208-211
18. Rowe, T. and J. A. Gauthier. 1992. Ancestry, paleontology, and the definition of the name Mammalia. Systematic Biology 41:372-378
19. Sereno, P S. 1991. Basal archosaurs: phylogenetic relationships and functional implications. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 2:1-53
20. Sereno, P S and A. B. Arcucci. 1990. The monophyly of crurotarsal archosaurs and the origin of bird and crocodile ankle joints. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie Abhandlungen 180:21-52
21. von Zittel, K. A. 1890. Handbuch der Palaontologie, Vol. 3: Vertebrata (Pisces, Amphibia, Reptilia, Aves). Oldenbourg, Munich, 900 pp