Methodological requirements for studying creativity in organizations

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 73-90

  Schoenfeldt, Lyle F ^a   Jansen, Karen J ^b  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031508564     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00782.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. AGGARWAL, Y. P., & VERMA, L. K. (1977). Internal-external control of high creative and low creative high school students at different levels of socio-economic status. Journal of Creative Behavior, 11, 150.
2. AMABILE, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
3. AMABILE T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
4. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Washington, DC: Author.
5. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCAITION. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
6. BENTLER, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
7. BRONFENBRENNER, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak & K. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. BRONFENBRENNER, U. & CECI, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568-586.
9. BROWN, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds, (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-32). New York: Plenum.
10. BUEL, W. D. (1965). Biographical data and the identification of creative research personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 318-321.
11. BUEL, W. D., ALBRIGHT, L. E., & GLENNON, J. R. (1966). A note on the generality and cross-validity of personal history for identifying creative research scientists, Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 217-219.
12. CAMPBELL, D. T., & FISKE, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 281-302.
13. CARROLL, J. B. (1968) Review of The nature of human intelligence by J. P. Guilford. American Educational Research Journal, 73, 105-112.
14. CATTELL, R. B., & BUTCHER, H. T. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
15. CROCKER, L., LABRE, M., & MILLER, M. D. (1988). The generalizability of content validity ratings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 287-299.
16. CRONBACH, L. J., & MEEHL, P. E. (1955). Construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
17. CUMMINGS, A. (1995). The radicalness of employee ideas: An interactive model of co-worker networks and problem-solving styles. (Available from Anne Cummings, Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois, 339 Commerce West, 1206 S. Sixth St., Champaign, Illinois 61820.)
18. FITZPATRICK, A. R. (1983). The meaning of content validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 3-13.
19. FISKE, D. W. (1987). Construct invalidity comes from method effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 285-307.
20. GORSUCH, R. L.. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
21. GOUGH, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405.
22. GUILFORD, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. GUILFORD, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37-59). Chicago: Aldine.
24. GUILFORD, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.
25. GUILFORD, J. P., & HOEPFNER, R. (1971). The analysis of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. GUION, R. M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. GUION, R. M. (1974a). Content validity conference. Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 12(1), 18.
28. GUION, R. M. (1974b). Open a new window: Validities and values in psychological measurement. American Psychologist, 29, 287-296.
29. GUION, M. (1977). Content validity-the source of my discontent. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 1-10.
30. GUION, R. M. (1978a). "Content validity" in moderation. Personnel Psychology, 31, 205-213.
31. GUION, R. M. (1978b). Scoring of content domain samples: The problem of fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 499-506.
32. GULLIKSEN, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
33. HARRINGTON, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.
34. HOCEVAR, D. & BACHELOR, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.) Handbook of Creativity (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum Press.
35. HORN, J. L., & KNAPP, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford's structure of intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33-43.
36. HUMPHREYS, L. G. (1962). The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17 475-483.
37. JORESKOG, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrica, 34, 183-202.
38. JORESKOG, K. G., & SORBORN D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Department of Statistics, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
39. KANTER, R. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40. KANTER, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. KUMAR, A. (1981). Interest patterns of high and low creatives. Journal of Creative Behavior, 15, 270.
42. LOEVINGER, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory [Monograph]. Psychological Reports, 3, 635-694.
43. MARSH, H. W., & HOCEVAR, D. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 231-248.
44. MESSICK, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
45. MICHAEL, W. B., & WRIGHT, C. R. (1989). Psychometric issues in the assessment ofcreativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds, (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 33-75). New York: Plenum.
46. MUMFORD, M. & GUSTAFSON, S. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
47. NUNNALLY, J. C. (1978) Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. OLDHAM, G. R., & CUMMINGS, A. (in press). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal.
49. PELZ, D., & ANDREWS. F. (1966). Autonomy, coordination, and stimulation in relation to scientific achievement. Behavioral Science, 11, 89-97.
50. REDMOND, M. R., MUMFORD, M. D., & TEACH, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120-151.
51. REILLY, R. R., & CHAO, G. T. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures Personnel Psychology, 35, 1-61.
52. Roethlisberger, F., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. New York: Wiley.
53. SACKETT, P. R., & LARSON, J. R., Jr (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough, (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 419-489). Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
54. SCHMIDT, F. L. (1988). Validity generalization and the future of criterion related validity. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp 173-189), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. SCHMIDT, F. L., HUNTER, J. E., PEARLMAN, K., & HIRSH, H. R. (1985). Forty questions about validity generalization and metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 38, 697-798.
56. SCHNEIDER, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
57. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
58. SCOTT, S. G., & BRUCE, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
59. SHALLEY, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 179-185.
60. SIMONTON, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218-226. (a)
61. SIMONTON, D. K. (1976). The causal relation between war and scientific discovery: An exploratory cross-national analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 7, 133-144. (b)
62. SIMONTON, D. K. (1976). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630-640. (c)
63. SIMONTON, D. K. (1977a). Creative productivity, age and stress: A biographical time-series of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791-804.
64. SIMONTON, D. K. (1977b). Eminence, creativity and geographicical marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805-816.
65. SIMONTON, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1603-1616.
66. SIMONTON, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin 104, 251-267.
67. SPELLER, K. G., & SCHUMACHER, G. M. (1975). Age and set in creative test performance. Psychological Reports, 36, 447-450.
68. TENOPYR, M. L. (1977). Content-construct confusion. Personnel Psychology, 30, 47-54.
69. THAMHAIN, H. J., & WILEMON, D. L. (1987). Building high performing engineering project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-34 (3), 130-137.
70. THORNDIKE, R. L. (1982). Applied psychometrics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
71. VAN de VEN, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.
72. WEST, M. & FARR, J. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. West & J. Farr (Eds.) Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, (pp. 3-13). New York; Wiley.
73. WOODMAN, R. W., & SCHOENFELDT, L. F. (1989). Individual differences in creativity: An interactionist perspective. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds, (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 77-91). New York: Plenum.
74. WOODMAN, R. W., SAWYER, J. E., & GRIFFIN, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
75. YARDLEY, C. R., & BOLEN, L. M. (1980). Relationship of locus of control to figural creativity in second-grade students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14, 276-277.