Alexander and govern’s approximation: Providing an alternative to anova under variance heterogeneity

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 271-286

  Schneider, Pamela J ^a   Penfield, Douglas A ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031506896     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1997.9943459     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alexander, R. A., & Govern, D. M. (1994). A new and simpler approximation for ANOVA under variance heterogeneity. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19(2), 91-101.
2. Algina, J., Oshima, T. C., & Lin, W. (1994). Type I error rates for the Welch’s test and James’s second-order test under nonnormality and inequality of variance when there are two groups. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19(3), 275-291.
3. Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
4. Brown, M. B., & Forsythe, A. B. (1974). The small sample behavior of some statistics which test the equality of means. Technometrics, 16(1), 129-132.
5. Clinch, J. J., & Keselman, H. J. (1982). Parametric alternatives to the analysis of variance. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7(3), 207-214.
6. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Dijkstra, J. B., & Werter, P. S. P. J. (1981). Testing the equality of several means when population variances are unequal. Communications in Statistics- Simulation and Computation, 810, 557-569.
8. Fleishman, A. J. (1978). A method for simulating non-normal distributions. Psychometrika, 43(4), 521-532.
9. Glass, G. V, Peckman, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42(3), 237-288.
10. Harwell, M. R., Hayes, W. S., Olds, C. C., & Rubenstein, E. N. (1990, April). Summarizing Monte Carlo results in methodological research: The one-way fixed-effects ANOVA case. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 774)
11. Hill, G. W. (1970). Algorithm 395: Student’s t-distribution. Communications of the ACM, 13, 619-620.
12. Hsiung, T., & Olejnik, S. (1996). Type I error rates and statistical power for the James second-order test and the univariate F test in two-way fixed-effects ANOVA models under heteroscedasticity and/or nonnormality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 57-71.
13. Hsiung, T., Olejnik, S., & Huberty, C. (1994). Comment on a Wilcox test statistic for comparing means when variances are unequal. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19(2), 111-118.
14. James, G. S. (1951). The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 38, 324-329.
15. Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621.
16. Oshima, T. C., & Algina, J. (1992a). Type I error rates for James’s second-order test and Wilcoxon’s H., test under heteroscedasticity and non-normality. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 255-263.
17. Oshima, T. C., & Algina, J. (1992b). A SAS program for testing the hypothesis of equal means under heteroscedasticity: James’s second-order test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 117-118.
18. Penfield, D. A. (1994). Choosing a two-sample location test. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(4), 343-360.
19. Rogan, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1977). Is the ANOVA F-test robust to variance heterogeneity when sample sizes are equal? An investigation via a coefficient of variation. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 493-498.
20. SAS Institute, Inc. (1990a). SAS/IML software: Usage and reference, Version 6. Cary, NC: Author.
21. SAS Institute, Inc. (1990b). SAS/STAT users guide, Version 6 (4th ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
22. Tomarken, A. J., & Serlin, R. C. (1986). Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 90-99.
23. Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several means: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330-336.
24. Wilcox, R. R. (1988). A new alternative to the ANOVA F and new results on James’s second-order method. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 109-117.
25. Wilcox, R. R. (1989). Adjusting for unequal variances when comparing means in one-way and twoway fixed effects ANOVA models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 14(3), 269-278.
26. Wilcox, R. R., Charlin, V. L., & Thompson, K. L. (1986). New Monte Carlo results on the robustness of the ANOVA, F, W and F* statistics. Communications in Statistics-Simulation, 15(4), 933-943.