Changes in technology use in California's special education programs

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 233-242

  Lewis, Rena B ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031503407     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193259701800405     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aslin, N. C., & DeArman, J. W. (1976). Adoption and abandonment of innovative practices in high schools. Educational Leadership, 33, 601-606.
2. Becker, H. J. (1983). School uses of microcomputers: Reports from a national survey (Issue No. 1). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Center for Social Organization of Schools.
3. Becker, H. J. (1985). The second national U.S. school uses of microcomputers survey. Paper presented at the World Conference on Computers in Education, Norfolk, VA.
4. Becker, H. J. (1986-87). Instructional uses of school computers: Reports from the 1985 national survey (Issues 1-4). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Center for Social Organization of Schools.
5. Blackhurst, A. E., & MacArthur, C. A. (1986). Microcomputer use in special education personnel preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 27-36.
6. Bridges, E. W. (1992). Problem based learning for administrators. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
7. Burrello, L. C., Tracy, M. L., & Glassman, E. J. (1983). A national status report on the use of electronic technology in special education management. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 341-353.
8. Cosden, M. A. (1988). Microcomputer instruction and perceptions of effectiveness by special and regular education elementary school teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 242-253.
9. Cradler, J. (1995). A wake-up call for computer using educators. CUE Newsletter, 17(3), 5-7.
10. El-Khatib, L. M. (1987). Factors influencing the instructional use of computers with handicapped students in public schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(7), 1682A.
11. Ellsworth, N. J. (1994). Applications of technology for students with learning disabilities: A survey of New York City schools. LD Forum, 19(4), 21-24.
12. Faison, C. L. (1990). Special educators' perceptions of instructional media availability and use in special education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(3), 818A.
13. Goldman, S. R., Semmel, D. S., Cosden, M. A., Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1987). Special education administrators' policies and practices on microcomputer acquisition, allocation, and access for mildly handicapped children: Interfaces with regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 330-339.
14. Heil, R. V. (1989). An investigation of the resources necessary to support implementation of technology with learning-disabled students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(11), 3559A.
15. Hwang, M. J. (1990). A study of applications of microcomputer technology in special education in western Massachusetts schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(7), 2353A.
16. Lewis, R. B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17. Lewis, R. B., Harrison, P. J., Lynch, E. W., & Saba, F. (1994). Applications of technology in special education: A statewide study. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 69-79.
18. Lewis, R. B., Lynch, E. W., Harrison, P. J., & Saba, F. (1988). Effective classroom practices: What California teachers say about using technology with handicapped learners. In H. J. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on "Computer Technology/ Special Education/Rehabilitation" (pp. 357-366). Northridge, CA: California State University, Office of Disabled Student Services.
19. MacArthur, C. A., & Malouf, D. B. (1991). Teachers' beliefs, plans, and decisions about computer-based instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 44-72.
20. Market Data Retrieval. (1993). Education and technology, 1993: A survey of the K-12 market. Shelton, CT: Author.
21. Neuman, D. (1989). Computer-based education for learning disabled students: Teachers' perceptions and behaviors. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 156-166.
22. Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning (Report No. OTA-SET-379). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23. Okolo, C. M., Rieth, H. J., & Bahr, C. M. (1989). Microcomputer implementation in secondary special education programs: A study of special educators', mildly handicapped adolescents', and administrators' perspectives. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 107-117.
24. Paulson, D., & Anderson, E. J. (1987). A survey of microcomputer technology use in rural special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 97-103.
25. Penso, R. A. (1991). A survey of factors associated with student computer use in resource specialist programs. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(7), 2513A.
26. Robinson, J. A. (1992, Summer). The search for the technological panacea. Information Strategy, 8, 28-30.
27. Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1990). Inclusive schooling. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schooling (pp. 3-23). Baltimore: Brookes.
28. Swanby, R. L. (1996). Computer technology in the special education classroom: What is actually going on? In Eleventh Annual Conference of Technology for People with Disabilities, California State University, Northridge: Submitted papers, 1996 [computer software]. Newport Beach, CA: Rapidtext.
29. Watkins, M. W. (1989). Computerized drill-and-practice and academic attitudes of learning disabled students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 167-172.
30. Will, M. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411-415.