Determining Effective Follow-up of E-Mail Surveys

American Journal of Health Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 193-196

  Kittleson, Mark J ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031499611     PISSN: 10873244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Parker L. Collecting data the email way. Training and Development 1992; 46(7): 52-54.
2. Ernest W. Using Netscape. Indianapolis, IN Que, 1995.
3. Ryder JC. Health and Fitness on the Internet. Alameda, CA Sybex, Inc., 1995.
4. Sarvela PD, McDermott RJ. Health Education Evaluation and Measurement: A Practitioner's Perspective. Madison, WI, WCB Brown & Benchmark, 1993.
5. Babbie E. Survey Research Methods, 2nd edition. Belmont, CA Wadsworth Publishing, 1990.
6. Kittleson MJ. Comparison of the response rate between e-mail and postcards. Health Values 1995;19(2):27-29.
7. Dignan MB. A brief review of sample survey methods for research in health education and health promotion. Health Values 1992;16(3):58-61.
8. Isaac S, Michael WB. Handbook in Research and Evaluation: For Education and the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. San Diego, CA EdITS Publishers, 1990.
9. Torabi MR. Factors affecting response rate in mail survey questionnaires. Health Values 1991;15(5):57-59.
10. Windsor R, Baranowski T, Clark N, Cutter G. Evaluation of Health Promotion, Health Education, and Disease Prevention Programs, Second Edition. Mountain View, CA Mayfield Publishers, 1994.
11. Fox RJ, Crask MR, Jonghoon K. Mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly 1988;52:467-491.
12. Rucker M. Personalization of mail surveys: too much of a good thing? Educational and Psychological Measurement 1984;44(4):893-905.