Gender differences in spatial ability tasks - A question of strategy?;Geschlechtsdifferenzen bei raumvorstellungsaufgaben - Eine frage der strategie?

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 85-94

  Hosenfeld, Ingmar ^a   Strauss, Bernd ^b   Köller, Olaf ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031499096     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Amthauer, R. (1953). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test (IST). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
2. Amthauer, R. (1970). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test (IST-70). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
3. Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness-of-fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
4. Barratt, E. S. (1953). An analysis of verbal reports of solving spatial problems as an aid in defining spatial factors. Journal of Psychology, 36, 17-25.
5. Baughman, E. E. & Dahlstrom, W. G. (1968). Negro and white children: A psychological study in the rural south. New York: Academic Press.
6. Borich, G. D. & Bauman, P. M. (1972). Convergent and discriminant validation of the French and Guilford-Zimmerman spatial orientation and spatial visualization factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 1029-1033.
7. Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345-370.
8. Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M. & Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? American Psychologist, 40, 786-799.
9. Cooper, L. A. (1976). Individual differences in visual comparison processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 433-444.
10. El Koussy, A. A. H. (1935). An investigation into the factors in tests involving the visual perception of space. British Journal of Psychology, 20, 1-89.
11. Everitt, P. S. & Hand, D. J. (1981). Finite mixture distributions. London: Chapmann and Hall.
12. Formann, A. K. (1984). Die Latent-Class-Analyse. Weinheim: Beltz.
13. French, J. W. (1951). The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Psychometric Monographs, 5.
14. Gittler, G. (1984). Entwicklung und Erprobung eines neuen Testinstruments zur Messung des räumlichen Vorstellungsvermögens. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 5, 141-165.
15. Harris, L. J. (1978). Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In Kinsbourne, M. (Ed.). Assymetrical function of the brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 405-522.
16. 2 and d. American Psychologist, 36, 892-901.
17. Kail, R., Carter, P. & Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 182-186.
18. Köller, O., Rost, J. & Köller, M. (1994). Individuelle Unterschiede beim Lösen von Raumvorstellungsaufgaben aus dem IST- bzw. IST-70-Untertest «Würfelaufgaben». Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202, 65-85.
19. Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F. & Woltz, D. J. (1984). Componential modelling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325-1345.
20. Linn, M. C. & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
21. Maccoby, E. E. & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Maier, P. H. (1994). Räumliches Vorstellungsvermögen: Komponenten, geschlechtsspezifische Differenzen, Relevanz, Entwicklung und Realisierung in der Realschule. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.
23. Martin-Löf, P. (1973). Statistiska modeller. Ansteckningar fram seminarier laesaret 1969-70 utarbetade av Rolf Sundberg. 2: a uppl. Stockholm: Institut foer foerssaekringsmatematik och matematisk vid Stockholms Universitet.
24. McDonald, R.P. & Marsh, H.W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
25. Michael, W. B., Zimmermann, W. S. & Guilford, J. P. (1950). An investigation of two hypotheses regarding the nature of the spatial-relations and visualization factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 187-213.
26. Michael, W. B., Zimmermann, W. S. & Guilford, J. P. (1951). An investigation of the nature of the spatial-relations and visualization factors in two high school samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 11, 561-577.
27. Pawlik, K. (1968). Dimensionen des Verhaltens. Bern: Huber.
28. Putz-Osterloh, W. (1977). Über Problemlöseprozesse bei dem Test Würfelaufgaben aus dem Intelligenzstrukturtest IST und IST-70 von Amthauer. Diagnostica, 23, 252-265.
29. Putz-Osterloh, W. & Lüer, G. (1975). Informationsverarbeitung bei einem Test zur Erfassung der Raumvorstellung. Diagnostica, 21, 166-181.
30. Putz-Osterloh, W. & Lüer, G. (1979). Wann produzieren Probanden räumliche Vorstellungen beim Lösen von Raumvorstellungsaufgaben? Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 26, 138-156.
31. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Kopenhagen: Nielson & Lydiche.
32. Read, T. R. C. & Cressie, N. A. C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer.
33. Rost, D. H. (1977). Raumvorstellung: Psychologische und pädagogische Aspekte. Weinheim: Beltz.
34. Rost, J. (1982). An unconditional likelihood ratio for testing item homogenity in the rasch model. Education Research and Perspectives, 9, 7-17.
35. Rost, J. (1988). Quantitative und qualitative Testtheorie. Bern: Huber.
36. Rost, J. (1990). Raschmodels in latent classes. An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271-282.
37. Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polytomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 75-92.
38. Rost, J. (1996). Testtheorie, Testkonstruktion. Bern: Huber.
39. Rost, J. & Georg, W. (1991). Alternative Skalierungsmöglichkeiten zur Klassischen Testtheorie am Beispiel der Skala «Jugendzentrismus». ZA-Information, 28, 52-74.
40. Rost, J. & v. Davier, M. (1995). Mixture distribution Rasch models. In Fischer, G. & Molenaar, I. (Eds.). Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications. New York: Springer, 257-270.
41. Rost, J. & Strauß, B. (1992). Recent developments in psychometrics and test theory. The German Journal of Psychology, 12, 91-119.
42. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
43. Stumpf, H. & Klieme, E. (1989). Sex related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 915-921.
44. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monographs, 1.
45. Thurstone, L. L. (1949). Mechanical aptitude III - Analysis of group tests. Psychometric Laboratory Report No. 55. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Thurstone, L. L. (1950). Some primary mental abilities in visual thinking. Psychometric Laboratory Report No. 59. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Trautner, H.-M., Hoppe-Graff, S., Wethkamp, B. & Lohaus, A. (1985). Geschlechtsunterschiede beim Lösen von Raumvorstellungsaufgaben mit unterschiedlicher Aufgabenstruktur. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 6, 51-63.
48. Davier, M. (1994). Programm WINMIRA. Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften.
49. v. Davier, M. & Rost, J. (in Druck). Die Erfassung transsituativer Copingstile durch Stimulus-Response-Inventare. Diagnostica.
50. Vandenberg, S. G. & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations. A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
51. Voyer, D., Voyer, S. & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.