A graph-rewriting visual language for database programming

Journal of Visual Languages and Computing

Volumn 8, Issue 5-6, 1997, Pages 641-674

  Rodgers, P J ^a   King, P J H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031498435     PISSN: 1045926X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jvlc.1997.0033     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. 1. M. Petre & T. R. G. Green (1992) Learning to read graphics: some evidence that 'seeing' an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 3, 25-47.
2. 2. M. Angelaccio, T. Catarci & G. Santucci (1990) QDB*: a graphical query language with recursion. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16, 1150-1163.
3. 3. M. P. Consens, I. F. Cruz & A. O. Mendelzon (1992) Visualizing queries and querying visualizations. SIGMOD RECORD 21, 39-46.
4. 4. J. R. Cordy & T. C. N. Graham (1992) GVL: visual specification of graphical output. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 3, 25-47.
5. 5. L. Mohan & R. L. Kashyap (1993) A visual query language for graphical interaction with schema-intensive databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 5, 843-858.
6. 6. M. Nagl (1983) A tutorial and bibliographical survey on graph grammars. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Graph Grammars and their Application to Computer Science. Springer, LNCS 153, Berlin, pp. 70-126.
7. 7. J. R. Glauert, J. R. Kennaway & M. R. Sleep (1991) Dactl: An Experimental Graph Rewriting Language. Proceedings 4th International Workshop on Graph Grammars and their Application to Computer Science. Springer, LNCS 532, Berlin, pp. 378-395.
8. 8. J. P. Loyall & S. M. Kaplan (1992) Visual concurrent programming with Δ grammars. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing pp. 107-133.
9. 9. A. Schurr (1994) Rapid programming with graph rewrite rules. Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Very High Level Languages (VHLL), Santa Fe, October, pp. 83-100.
10. 10. M. Gyssens, J. Paredaens, J. Van den Bussche & D. Van Gucht (1994) A graph-oriented object database model. IEEE Transactions on Knowlegde and Data Engineering 6, 572-586.
11. 11. R. A. Frost (1982) Binary relational storage structures. The Computer Journal 25, 358-367.
12. 12. S. B. Southerden (1992) Information technology: support for law enforcement investigations and intelligence. ICL Technical Journal 302-315.
13. 13. K. J. Goldman, S. A. Goldman, P. C. Kanellakis & S. B. Zdonik (1986) ISIS: interface for a semantic information system. Proceedings ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 151-164.
14. 14. R. Ayres & P. J. H. King (1994) Extending the semantic power of functional database query languages with associational features. Congres INFORSID'94, Aix-en-Provence, pp. 301-320; (Also appears in: Ingénierie des Systèmes d'information 3, (1995) 441-463.)
15. 14. R. Ayres & P. J. H. King (1994) Extending the semantic power of functional database query languages with associational features. Congres INFORSID'94, Aix-en-Provence, pp. 301-320; (Also appears in: Ingénierie des Systèmes d'information 3, (1995) 441-463.)
16. 15. M. R. Quillian (1967) Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioural Science 12, 410-430.
17. 16. A. Poulovassilis & M. Levene (1994) A nested-graph model for the representation and manipulation of complex objects. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12, 35-68.