Arrangements and rules of distribution of burdens and duties: The case of household chores

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 189-208

  Mikula, Gerold ^a   Freudenthaler, Heribert H ^a   Brennacher Kröll, Sigrun ^a   Schiller Brandl, Renate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031497430     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199703)27:2<189::AID-EJSP814>3.0.CO;2-O     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1990). Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decisions Making, 3, 195-204.
2. Antill, J. K., & Cotton, S. (1988). Factors affecting the division of labor in households. Sex Roles, 18, 531-553.
3. Atkinson, J., & Huston, T. L. (1984). Sex role orientation and division of labor early in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 330-345.
4. Berheide, C. W. (1984). Women's work in the home: Seems like old times. In: B. B. Hess, & M. B. Sussman (Eds), Women and the family: two decades of change. New York: Harworth Press.
5. Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives' perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570-581.
6. Cyprian, G. (1978). Sozialisation in Wohngemeinschaften. (Socialization in flat sharing groups). Stuttgart: Enke.
7. De Dreu, C. K. W. (1996). Gain-loss frame in outcome-interdependence: Does it influence equality or equity considerations? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 315-324.
8. De Dreu, C. K. W., Lualhati, J. C., & McCusker, C. (1994). Effects of gain-loss frames on satisfaction with self-other outcome differences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 497-510.
9. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
10. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. A psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
11. Emler, N., & Hall, S. (1994). Economic roles in the household system: Young people's experiences and expectations. In M. J. Lerner, & G. Mikula (Eds), Entitlement and the affectional bond: justice in close relationships. New York. Plenum Press.
12. Griffith, W. I. (1989). The allocation of negative outcomes: Examining the issues. Advances in Group Processes, 6, 1-51.
13. Haider, E. (1984) Wohngemeinschaften in Österreich. (Flat sharing groups in Austria). Frankfurt: Campus.
14. Homans, C. G. (1974). Social behavior. Its elementary forms (revised edn.). New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich.
15. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relationships: a theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
16. Korczak, D. (1978). Wohnkollektive. Erscheingsformen und Stabilität von Familienformen. (Flat sharing groups. Forms and stability of a family type). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cologne.
17. Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506-531.
18. Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement, and the distribution of family labor. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 141-159.
19. Messick, D. M. (1993) Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. A. Mellers, & J. Baron (Eds), Psychological perspectives on justice: theory and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. M. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In D. M. Messick, & K. S. Cook (Eds), Equity theory: psychological and sociological perspectives. New York: Praeger.
21. Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. Bern: Huberverlag; New York: Springer.
22. Mikula, G. (1981). Concepts of distributive justice in allocation decisions. A review of research in German-speaking countries. The German Journal of Psychology, 5, 222-236.
23. Mikula, G. (1984). Justice and fairness in interpersonal relations: Thoughts and suggestions. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mikula, G., Freudenthaler, H. H., Brennacher-Kröll, S., & Brunschko, B. (1997). Division of household labor, perceived justice, and satisfaction in student-households. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, in press.
25. Mummendey, A., Otten, S., & Blanz, M. (1994). Social categorization and intergroup discrimination: The asymmetry in positive versus negative outcome allocations. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 15-30.
26. Mummendey, A., Simon, B., Dietze, C., Grünert, G., Haeger, S., Kessler, S., Lettgen, S., & Schäferhoff, S. (1992). Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 125-144.
27. Otten, S., Mummendey, A., & Blanz, W. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome-allocations. The impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568-581.
28. Peeters, G., Czapinski, J., & Lewicka, M. (1992a) Positive-negative asymmetries in affect and evaluations - Part 1. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 425-509.
29. Peeters, G., Czapinski, J., & Lewicka, M. (1992b). Positive-negative asymmetries in affect and evaluations - Part 2. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 511-591.
30. Robinson, J., & Spitze, G. (1992). Whistle while you work? The effect of household task performance on women's and men's well-being. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 844-861.
31. Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In E. T. Higgins, & A. Kruglanski (Eds), Social psychology: handbook of basic mechanisms and processes. New York: Guilford.
32. Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M., & Messick. D. M. (1987a). Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 208-216.
33. Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M., & Messick, D. M. (1987b) The effects of framing social dilemmas as give-some and take-some games. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 103-108.
34. Samuelson, C. D., & Allison, S. T. (1994). Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 58, 1-27.
35. Schwinger, T. (1980). Just allocations of goods: Decisions among three principles. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction. Bern: Huberverlag; New York: Springer.
36. Spitze, G. (1988). Women's employment and family relations: A review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 595-618.
37. Stafford, R., Backman, E., & Dibona, P. (1977). The division of labor among cohabiting and married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 43-57.
38. Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and entitlement in marriage: Benefits and barriers. In: M. J. Lerner, & G. Mikula (Eds), Entitlement and the affectional bond. Justice in close relationships. New York: Plenum Press.
39. Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women's sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181-196.
40. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 15, 845-871.
41. Törnblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. Advances in Group Processes, 5, 141-148.
42. Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In K. R. Scherer (Ed.), Justice: interdisciplinary perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Ward, R. A. (1993). Marital happiness and household equity in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 427-438.