Goldstone Mode in Charged Superconductivity: Theoretical Studies of the Carlson-Goldman Mode and Effects of the Landau Damping in the Superconducting State

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 2437-2458

  Ohashi, Yoji ^a   Takada, Satoshi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carlson Goldman mode; Central peak problem; Collective mode; Impurity effect; Landau damping; Phason; Plasma; Superconductivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031497020     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.66.2437     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. R. V. Carlson and A. M. Goldman: Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 880.
2. R. V. Carlson and A. M. Goldman: Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 11.
3. R. V. Carlson and A. M. Goldman: J. Low Temp. Phys. 25 (1976) 67.
4. K. Maki and H. Sato: J. Low Temp. Phys. 16 (1974) 557.
5. A. Schmid and G. Shön: Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 941.
6. S. N. Artemenko and A. F. Volkov: Sov. Phys. -JETP 42 (1976) 896.
7. M. Dinter: J. Low Temp. Phys. 26 (1977) 39.
8. M. Dinter: Phys. Rev. B 18 (1978) 3163.
9. M. Dinter: J. Low Temp. Phys. 32 (1978) 529.
10. I. O. Kulik, Entin-Wohlman and R. Orbach: J. Low Temp. Phys. 43 (1981) 591.
11. O. D. Cheishvili: J. Low Temp. Phys. 48 (1982) 445.
12. G. Shön, Nonequilibrium Superconductivity, ed. D. N. Langenberg and A. I. Larkin (Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, 1986) Chap. 13.
13. K. Y. M. Wong and S. Takada: Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 5644.
14. P. W. Anderson: Phys. Rev. 130 (1963) 439.
15. P. W. Higgs: Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 132.
16. J. T. Anderson, R. V. Carlson and A. M. Goldman: J. Low Temp. Phys. 8 (1972) 29.
17. F. E. Aspen and A. M. Goldman: J. Low Temp. Phys. 43 (1981) 559.
18. T. Tsuzuki: Prog. Theor. Phys. 41 (1969) 1600.
19. T. Tsuzuki: Prog. Theor. Phys. 42 (1969) 1020.
20. R. A. Ferrel: J. Low Temp. Phys. 1 (1969) 423.
21. D. J. Scalapino: Phys. Rev. Lett. 24 (1970) 1052.
22. H. Takayama: Prog. Theor. Phys. 46 (1971) 1.
23. S. R. Shenoy and P. A. Lee: Phys. Rev. B 10 (1974) 2744.
24. C compared with the phase fluctuation. In addition, it does not induce any anomalous structure in the low energy region. Thus, we study only eq. (2.6) and does not examine the amplitude fluctuation.
25. H. Ebisawa and K. Maki: Prog. Theor. Phys. 51 (1974) 337.
26. φ is always obtained. Conclusively, the slight inversion is not important within our approximation.
27. K. Y. M. Wong and S. Takada: Phys. Rev. B 36 (1987) 5476.
28. One may think that the inconsistency is due to the neglect of the imaginary part in our theory: Reference 10 which takes into account the imaginary part concludes that the Carlson-Goldman mode has no damping in the clean limit. This means that eq. (2.29) must be reproduced even within our treatment, if eq. (2.29) is true. Namely, the neglect of the imaginary part is not the origin of the difference.
29. V. Vaks, V. Galitsukii and A. Larkin: Sov. Phys. -JETP 14 (1962) 1177.
30. K. Nagai: Prog. Theor. Phys. 54 (1975) 1.
31. S. M. Shapiro, J. D. Axe and G. Shirane: Phys. Rev. B 6 (1972) 4332.
32. C. Pethick and H. Smith: Ann. Phys. 119 (1979) 133.
33. M. Tinkham: Introduction to Superconductivity (McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1975) Chap. 6.
34. K. Maki, in Superconductivity, ed. R. D. Parks (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1969) Vol. 2, p. 1035.
35. G. Richayzen, Green's functions and Condensed Matter (Academic Press, London, 1980) Chap. 4.