Is 44 Liquormart a turning point?

Journal of Public Policy and Marketing

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 156-162

  Richards, Jef I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031494822     PISSN: 07439156     EISSN: 15477207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074391569701600118     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anheuser-Busch v. Schmoke (1996a), 116 S.Ct. 1821.
2. _ (1996b), 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29460.
3. Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977), 433 U.S. 350.
4. Bigelow v. Virginia (1975), 421 U.S. 809.
5. Central Hudson Gas & Electric v. Public Service Commission of New York (1980), 447 U.S. 557.
6. Cincinnati v. Discovery Network (1993), 113 S.Ct. 1505.
7. Edenfield v. Fane (1993), 113 S.Ct. 1792.
8. Florida Bar v. Went For It (1995), 115 S.Ct. 2371.
9. Food and Drug Administration (1996), Regulations Restricting the Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco to Protect Children and Adolescents, 61 Fed. Reg. 44396 (August 28).
10. 44 Liquormart v. Rhode Island (1996), 116 S.Ct. 1495.
11. Jackson, Thomas H. and John Calvin Jeffries, Jr. (1979), "Commercial Speech: Economic Due Process and the First Amendment," Virginia Law Review, 65, 1-41.
12. Kozinski, Alex and Stuart Banner (1990), "Who's Afraid of Commercial Speech?" Virginia Law Review, 76, 627-53.
13. Lowenstein, Daniel H. (1988), '"Too Much Puff': Persuasion, Paternalism, and Commercial Speech," University of Cincinnati Law Review, 56, 1205-49.
14. Mandel, Richard P. (1994), "Regulation of Commercial Speech: Did the 1993 Supreme Court Decisions Clarify the Scope of First Amendment Protection?" Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(1), 159-63.
15. McGowan, David F. (1990), "A Critical Analysis of Commercial Speech," California Law Review, 78, 359-448.
16. McKay, Sandra E., Mary Jane Dundas, and John W. Yeargain (1996), "The FDA's Proposed Rules Regulating Tobacco and Underage Smoking and the Commercial Speech Doctrine," Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15 (2), 296-310.
17. Metromedia v. City of San Diego (1981), 453 U.S. 490.
18. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), 376 U.S. 254.
19. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association (1978), 436 U.S. 447.
20. Petty, Ross D. (1993), "Advertising and the First Amendment: A Practical Test for Distinguishing Commercial Speech from Fully Protected Speech," Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12 (2), 170-77.
21. Posadas de Puerto Rico v. Tourism Company (1986), 478 U.S. 328.
22. Pittsburgh Press v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations (1973), 413 U.S. 376.
23. Richards, Jef I. (1996), "Politicizing Cigarette Advertising," Catholic University Law Review, 45, 1147-212.
24. Rubin v. Coors Brewing Company (1995), 115 S.Ct. 1585.
25. S.U.N.Y. v. Fox (1989). 492 U.S. 469.
26. U.S. v. Edge Broadcasting (1993), 113 S.Ct. 2696.
27. U.S. v. O'Brien (1968), 391 U.S. 367.
28. Valentine v. Chrestensen (1942), 316 U.S. 52.
29. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1976), 425 U.S. 748.
30. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (1985), 471 U.S. 626.