It's not just whether you win or lose, it's also where you play the game: A naturalistic, cross-cultural examination of the positivity bias

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 768-778

  Hallahan, Mark ^a   Lee, Fiona ^b   Herzog, Thaddeus ^c  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031494263     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022022197286007     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ambady, N., Koo, J., Lee., F., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). More than words: Linguistic and nonlinguistic politeness in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 996-1011.
2. Bettman, J. R., & Weitz, B. A. (1983). Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 165-183.
3. Bradley, G. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71.
4. Brewer, M. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307-324.
5. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brown, R. (1990). Politeness theory: Exemplar and exemplary. In E. Rock (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 23-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Crittendon, K. (1991). Asian self-effacement or feminine modesty? Attributional patterns of women university students in Taiwan. Gender & Society, 5, 98-117.
8. Fletcher, G., & Ward, C. (1988). Attribution theory and processes: A cross-cultural perspective. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Goffman, E., (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
10. Grove, R., Hanrahan, S., & McInman, A. (1991). Success/failure in attributions across involvement categories in sports. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(1), 93-97.
11. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric measures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. (1990). Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 719-729.
13. Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246-256.
14. Jones, E., & Pittman, T. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Kelley, H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-240.
16. Koo, J. (1995). Politeness theory: Universality and specificity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
17. Lau, R., & Russell, D. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages: A field test of some current hypotheses in attribution research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 29-38.
18. Lee, F. (1993). Being polite and keeping MUM: How bad news is communicated in organizational hierarchies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1124-1149.
19. Lee, F., Hallahan, M., & Herzog, T. (1996). Explaining real life events: How culture and domain shape attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 732-741.
20. Lee, F., & Robinson, R. (August, 1996). Attribution theory and the effectiveness of social accounts. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Cincinnati, OH.
21. Mark, M., Mutrie, N., Brooks, D., & Harris, D. (1984). Causal attributions of wins and losses in individual competitive sports: Toward a reformulation of the self-serving bias. Journal of Sports Psychology, 6(2), 184-196.
22. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
23. Miller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
24. Miller, J. (1986). Early cross-cultural commonalities in social explanation. Developmental Psychology, 22, 514-520.
25. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
26. Peterson, C. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages: An archival investigation of the covariation hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 136-141.
27. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Ego-centric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 322-336.
29. Salancik, G., & Meindl, J. (1984). Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 238-254.
30. Scanlan, T., & Passer, M. (1982). Self-serving bias in competitive sports settings: An attributional dilemma. Journal of Sports Psychology, 2(2), 124-136.
31. Schuster, B., Fosterling, F., & Weiner, B. (1989). Perceiving the causes of success and failure: A cross-cultural explanation of attributional concepts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 191-213.
32. Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250.
33. Shweder, R., & Bourne, E. (1984). Does the concept of person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. Levine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 159-199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Smith, S., & Whitehead, G. (1984). Attributions for promotion and demotion in the United States and India. Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 27-34.
35. Smith, S., Whitehead, G., & Sussman, N. (1990). The positivity bias in attributions: Two cross-cultural investigations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 283-301.
36. Smith-Hefner, N. (1988). Women and politeness: The Javanese example. Language in Society, 17, 535-554.
37. Staw, B., McKechie, P., & Puffer, S. (1983). The justification of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 582-600.
38. Taylor, D., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171.
39. Taylor, S., & Koivumaki, J. (1976). The perception of self and others: Acquaintanceship, affect, and actor-observer differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 403-408.
40. Tesser, A., & Rosen, S. (1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 192-232.
41. Walker, H. M., & Lev, J. (1953). Statistical inference. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
42. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
43. Zaccaro, S., Peterson, C., & Walker, S. (1987). Self-serving attributions for individual and group performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(3), 257-263.
44. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited: Or the motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47(2), 245-287.
45. Zullow, H. M., Oettingen, G., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (1988). Pessimistic explanatory style in the historical record: CAVing LBJ, presidential candidates, and East versus West Berlin. American Psychologist, 43, 673-682.